Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Lemon Tea Tree

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:07 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Actually, a relative of our Manuka, Leptospermum petersonii has a wonderfully clear lemon scent, and the bacteria fighting ability of the more familiar Tea Tree. According to my friendly distiller, what it really excels at is as an powerful insect repellant. And it smells much nicer than lemongrass or citronella! I’m thinking of melting some wax and making a candle for the deck with the Lemon Tea Tree Oil instead of citronella candles. And wondering if wiping down the kitchen counters with a spray of Lemon Tea Tree in water will keep the ants away as well as Peppermint Essential Oil does. Emotionally it is said to be useful for anxiety, stress, depression and for easing nervous tension. My Australian distiller says: Lemon tea tree is used in natural insect repellents for humans—we prefer it alone in a carrier oil, but others add Tea Tree and lemongrass plus the carrier oil—all in very small percentages, naturally. It does work, and is, from our point of view, the use for the oil. I personally wouldn’t add E. citriodora—the Lemon Tea Tree will stand on its own. Haven’t tried it with Cedarwood—we’re more producers than blenders, but we get feedback from all sorts of people. Leptospermum petersonii is being used for dog wash additives, but I’m not privy to the percentages. We have had evidence that the distillate water is extremely effective for clearing up mange skin problems, and helping to keep dogs free of fleas—it is anecdotal, but a client has 35 working cattle dogs, and will take all the distillate water we produce, and the percentage of oil in the water would be extremely small. My daughter the groomer is going to be trying this lovely lemony oil on the dogs she grooms this summer. If what the distiller says about the flea freedom is true, and I have no reason to doubt him, then I think we have a gold mine here. Note, further feedback from clients indicates that applying the EO to a horse’s mane and tail help keep the horseflies away. All sorts of “anti-insect” uses for this delightful stuff! WARNING: Contains citral, a strong sensitizer. Avoid use on broken skin. Avoid use during pregnancy (see this blog post on High Citral Oils vs Pregancy ). Maximum dilution for topical use: 0.7% (4 drops per fluid ounce). Please also see our blog post on the benefits of inhalation vs. ingesting essential oils. Use with caution in diabetes. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Images courtesy of The Paperbark Co. GC/MS: Batch # AU-58779 Batch #AU-59072 Batch #AU-59449 (Current Batch) Leptospermun petersonii, organically produced but not certified, steam-distilled leaves, Australia. – Powerful insect repellant – Useful dog wash additive – Emotionally useful for anxiety, stress, depression & easing nervous tension

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site12f8138e16f4d8cddc76f58a21791de2USD 18.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

3 reports connected; 3 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

3 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 179.21%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Leptospermum petersonii
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Jun 19, 12:00 AM UTC
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
Geranial32.62%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Neral27.31%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CitronellalCAS 106-23-020.89%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Citronellol5.35%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
GeraniolCAS 106-24-13.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
IsopulegolCAS 89-79-21.52%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-Isocitral1.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-CaryophylleneCAS 118-65-00.95%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoisopulegol0.82%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
NerolCAS 106-25-20.59%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1,8-Cineole0.51%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Citronellyl acetateCAS 150-84-50.49%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-isocitral0.47%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LinaloolCAS 78-70-60.37%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-50.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Dihydrocitronellol Synthetic0.25%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PineneCAS 127-91-30.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Humulene0.11%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LimoneneCAS 138-86-30.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-80.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
exo-Isocitral0.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
BicyclogermacreneCAS 24703-35-30.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
BorneolCAS 507-70-00.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-50.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-30.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
epi-alpha-BisabololCAS 78148-59-10.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-90.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LongifoleneCAS 475-20-70.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Bergamal0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-40.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SabineneCAS 3387-41-50.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrcene0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinolene0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Rose oxide0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-ElemeneCAS 20307-84-00.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Terpinyl acetateCAS 80-26-20.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-CadineneCAS 523-47-70.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isobutyl isobutyrate0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-beta-Ocimene0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrcenol0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Carveol0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-90.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-40.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-20.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoamyl isobutyrate0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Methylbutyl isobutyrateCAS 2445-69-40.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-Ocimene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
p-Mentha-3,8-diene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Rose oxide0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-50.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SpathulenolCAS 6750-60-30.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
53 measurements in this report · 53 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Lemon Tea Tree

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Lemon Tea Tree

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.