Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Manuka

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

This is a powerful antibacterial oil, gentler than the melaleucas (ie, Tea Tree, etc.). Similar in action to Tea Tree, but much less medicinal in aroma, this healing oil is honey scented. Use as you would Tea Tree, for anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, and anti-viral benefits. It is proven effective against both strep and staph infections. Testing at the University of Heidelberg show that Manuka is more effective than Tea Tree essential oil when dealing with gram positive bacteria. Both Tea Tree Oil and Manuka Oil also demonstrated a very good antimicrobial efficacy against various antibiotic-resistant staphylococcus species. Experimental use has shown it helpful in dealing with the symptoms of chronic fatigue. I find it milder and less irritating than Tea Tree in skin care products. This has become, in our house, one of the “must have” oils, and is a key ingredient in our Clarifying Synergy to combat acne breakouts. Educator and author Madeleine Kerkhof-Knapp Hayes advises it is a “go-to” oil along with Geranium and Calophyllum for any fungal type infection, including candida and thrush. (Always at a very low dilution!) (Update, in her November 2018 class in Atlanta GA, Ms. Kerkhof stated several times that she prefers to use Manuka rather than Tea Tree for the population she addresses. She feels Tea Tree Oil is just too harsh, and Manuka is at least as effective, if not more so. This Manuka Oil is harvested and distilled in western Australia. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. NZ-LS00218 Batch No. NZ-48504 Batch No. NZ-MO164 Batch No. NZ-58802 Batch No NZ-58842 Batch No. AU-59253 (Current Batch) Leptospermum scoparium, wildcrafted, steam-distilled leaves, Australia. – Powerful anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, and anti-viral – Effective against strep and staph infections – Preferred oil of Madeleine Kerkof (instead of Tea Tree)

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site06b2e28419998ec71e15a4a2275ba5e5USD 19.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

4 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 201.80%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Leptospermum scoparium
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
beta-SelineneCAS 17066-67-012.70%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-SelineneCAS 473-13-212.22%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-CalameneneCAS 72937-55-47.45%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Dauca-5,8-diene5.89%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Caryophyllene5.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-95.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Muurola-3,5-diene4.90%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-CadineneCAS 523-47-74.82%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-EudesmolCAS 473-15-43.90%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Muurolene3.50%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-CubebeneCAS 17699-14-83.31%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Leptospermone Triketone2.90%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LimoneneCAS 138-86-32.89%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
iso-Leptospermone Triketone2.19%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-51.69%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-01.42%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
10-epi-gamma-Eudesmol1.40%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Flavesone Triketone1.16%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-MaalieneCAS 489-29-20.99%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Humulene0.88%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
PogostolCAS 21698-41-90.81%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-80.80%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-AmorpheneCAS 483-75-00.76%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1-epi-CubenolCAS 19912-67-50.75%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1,10-di-epi-Cubenol0.72%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-CadineneCAS 39029-41-90.57%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Cadina-1(6),4-diene0.56%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Humulene0.53%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
GlobulolCAS 489-41-80.50%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E,E)-alpha-Farnesene0.40%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrcene0.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-90.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SeychelleneCAS 20085-93-20.33%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-10.30%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
GuaiolCAS 489-86-10.28%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Calacorene0.27%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-60.27%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PineneCAS 127-91-30.21%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Methyl (E)-cinnamate Phenylpropanoid0.21%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1,8-Cineole0.20%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Gleenol0.20%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LinaloolCAS 78-70-60.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-40.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Sibirene0.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Gurjunene0.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-40.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Benzyl isovalerate Phenolic0.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
MaaliolCAS 527-90-20.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoamyl benzoate0.11%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-MuurololCAS 104245-48-90.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-3-Hexenyl acetate0.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymene0.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinen-4-ol0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Pinocarvyl acetate0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-SelineneCAS 515-17-30.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Methyl eugenol0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
allo-Aromadendrene epoxide0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoterpinolene0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-GurjuneneCAS 489-40-70.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-Hex-3-en-1-ol0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SabineneCAS 3387-41-50.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Carene0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-beta-Ocimene0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Allohimachalol0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Hexanone0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1-Hexanol0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Octanal0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Hexyl acetate0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
DecanalCAS 112-31-20.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-ElemeneCAS 20307-84-00.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PatchouleneCAS 514-51-20.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-Farnesene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-Guaiene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
74 measurements in this report · 74 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Manuka

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Manuka

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.