Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Manuka
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
This is a powerful antibacterial oil, gentler than the melaleucas (ie, Tea Tree, etc.). Similar in action to Tea Tree, but much less medicinal in aroma, this healing oil is honey scented. Use as you would Tea Tree, for anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, and anti-viral benefits. It is proven effective against both strep and staph infections. Testing at the University of Heidelberg show that Manuka is more effective than Tea Tree essential oil when dealing with gram positive bacteria. Both Tea Tree Oil and Manuka Oil also demonstrated a very good antimicrobial efficacy against various antibiotic-resistant staphylococcus species. Experimental use has shown it helpful in dealing with the symptoms of chronic fatigue. I find it milder and less irritating than Tea Tree in skin care products. This has become, in our house, one of the “must have” oils, and is a key ingredient in our Clarifying Synergy to combat acne breakouts. Educator and author Madeleine Kerkhof-Knapp Hayes advises it is a “go-to” oil along with Geranium and Calophyllum for any fungal type infection, including candida and thrush. (Always at a very low dilution!) (Update, in her November 2018 class in Atlanta GA, Ms. Kerkhof stated several times that she prefers to use Manuka rather than Tea Tree for the population she addresses. She feels Tea Tree Oil is just too harsh, and Manuka is at least as effective, if not more so. This Manuka Oil is harvested and distilled in western Australia. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. NZ-LS00218 Batch No. NZ-48504 Batch No. NZ-MO164 Batch No. NZ-58802 Batch No NZ-58842 Batch No. AU-59253 (Current Batch) Leptospermum scoparium, wildcrafted, steam-distilled leaves, Australia. – Powerful anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, and anti-viral – Effective against strep and staph infections – Preferred oil of Madeleine Kerkof (instead of Tea Tree)
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 06b2e28419998ec71e15a4a2275ba5e5 | USD 19.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. NZ-LS00218Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. NZ-48504Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. NZ-MO164Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. NZ-58802Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No NZ-58842Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-59253 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
4 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 201.80%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| beta-SelineneCAS 17066-67-0 | 12.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-SelineneCAS 473-13-2 | 12.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-CalameneneCAS 72937-55-4 | 7.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Dauca-5,8-diene | 5.89% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 5.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-9 | 5.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Muurola-3,5-diene | 4.90% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CadineneCAS 523-47-7 | 4.82% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-EudesmolCAS 473-15-4 | 3.90% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Muurolene | 3.50% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CubebeneCAS 17699-14-8 | 3.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Leptospermone Triketone | 2.90% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 2.89% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| iso-Leptospermone Triketone | 2.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 1.69% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-0 | 1.42% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 10-epi-gamma-Eudesmol | 1.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Flavesone Triketone | 1.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-MaalieneCAS 489-29-2 | 0.99% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene | 0.88% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| PogostolCAS 21698-41-9 | 0.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 0.80% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-AmorpheneCAS 483-75-0 | 0.76% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-epi-CubenolCAS 19912-67-5 | 0.75% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,10-di-epi-Cubenol | 0.72% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-CadineneCAS 39029-41-9 | 0.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Cadina-1(6),4-diene | 0.56% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Humulene | 0.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| GlobulolCAS 489-41-8 | 0.50% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-alpha-Farnesene | 0.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-9 | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SeychelleneCAS 20085-93-2 | 0.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.30% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| GuaiolCAS 489-86-1 | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Calacorene | 0.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-6 | 0.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl (E)-cinnamate Phenylpropanoid | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,8-Cineole | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Gleenol | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-4 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sibirene | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Gurjunene | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Benzyl isovalerate Phenolic | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MaaliolCAS 527-90-2 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Isoamyl benzoate | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-MuurololCAS 104245-48-9 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-3-Hexenyl acetate | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Pinocarvyl acetate | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-SelineneCAS 515-17-3 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl eugenol | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| allo-Aromadendrene epoxide | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Isoterpinolene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-GurjuneneCAS 489-40-7 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Hex-3-en-1-ol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Carene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Allohimachalol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Hexanone | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Hexanol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octanal | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl acetate | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DecanalCAS 112-31-2 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-ElemeneCAS 20307-84-0 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PatchouleneCAS 514-51-2 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Farnesene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Guaiene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Manuka
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Manuka
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.