Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Vitex (Chasteberry) Leaf and Berry
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:12 PM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Anecdotal evidence indicates that the vitex tree’s various essential oils (available from both leaf and berry) may be extraordinarily helpful for women dealing with various menstrual and menopausal discomforts. However, this is an immensely powerful oil that needs careful and judicious use. Please read this information carefully and save a copy before purchasing and/or using the oil. Information from the distiller who used to provide our Vitex Berry Oil, Janina Sorenson, in Denmark: Vitex agnus castus is known to exert remarkable hormonal activity on especially the female hormonal system. It is believed to balance the two female gonadal hormones by having a progesterone-like activity. A commercial extract of the fruit is available commercially in Germany and has been repeatedly tested in clinical studies. Its action was found to increase the production of luteinising hormone, and hence be beneficial in the treatment of various diseases of the breasts and numerous menstrual abnormalities. I am told that Vitex agnus castus is highly advocated for diseases related to menstrual disorders, and that side effects have not been noted. (However, please read the safety warnings.) Many of the conditions named above are known likely consequences of progesterone deficiency, possibly stemming from the overabundance of estrogen like substances in the modern environment. Further information on Vitex, both leaf and berry oils, was presented at the Pacific Institute of Aromatherapy conference in November, 2000. A paper was presented by Barbara Chopin Lucks detailing her “Vitex Antholog,” anecdotal experiences of 23 women participating in a research project studying the use of Vitex oils in easing the various problems that occur during menopause. I highly recommend you invest in the proceedings of the convention, in order to read the whole report; it is available from the Pacific Institute. However, here is a brief summary of the experiences of the women who took part in the study, using the Berry Oil. First, Barbara learned that this is NOT an oil for men to use, or even be around…two men tried bottling it. One became nauseated, one developed a severe migraine. However, the vast majority of women using either the leaf or the berry oil found that their menopausal symptoms were greatly lessened, and planned to continue using the oil after the three month study period ended. Of the women who were still menstruating, almost all reported regulation of cycles and less cramping and PMS. However several women who had stopped bleeding (some for extended periods) found their menses returning. Many users of the Berry oil found a great improvement in hot flashes/night sweats, and found themselves experiencing much less insomnia. One woman reports sharing the berry oil with her 11 year old daughter, and that hormonally induced headaches have been cleared away. Good results were experienced in the areas of vaginal thinning and dryness. My personal impression, after reading the
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | fa509ee7dd21822dbe5ee8ab7343147c | USD 19.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. CR-48501Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. CR-23915Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. CR-58565Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. CR-59136Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. HR-59199Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. BA-59325 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
6 reports connected; 6 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
6 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,8-Cineole | 16.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 14.50% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Farnesene | 10.65% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 10.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 9.43% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 5.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpinyl acetateCAS 80-26-2 | 3.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BicyclogermacreneCAS 24703-35-3 | 3.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 2.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 2.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-ElemeneCAS 20307-84-0 | 1.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 1.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 1.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-9 | 1.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-GurjuneneCAS 489-40-7 | 1.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 1.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CedreneCAS 546-28-1 | 0.87% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.71% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene | 0.64% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 0.59% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 18252-46-5 | 0.56% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene | 0.55% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 0.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Terpineol | 0.43% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene | 0.42% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CarvacrolCAS 499-75-2 | 0.42% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SpathulenolCAS 6750-60-3 | 0.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-6 | 0.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene | 0.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Ledol | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| AromadendreneCAS 489-39-4 | 0.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| T-Cadinol | 0.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellyl acetateCAS 150-84-5 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-5 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Viridiflorene | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-4 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Ascaridole | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CarvoneCAS 99-49-0 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-epi-alpha-Funebrene | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Cembrene | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MaaliolCAS 527-90-2 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellol | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Gurjunene | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-SesquiphellandreneCAS 20307-83-9 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonanal | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NootkateneCAS 5090-61-9 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CadineneCAS 523-47-7 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Palustrol | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CamphorCAS 76-22-2 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornyl acetateCAS 76-49-3 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-GuaieneCAS 3691-12-1 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl eugenol | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalyl acetateCAS 115-95-7 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Terpinyl acetate | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Acoradiene | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sesquicineole | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Manool | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BourboneneCAS 5208-59-3 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Guaiene | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octan-3-yl acetate | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-GurjuneneCAS 22567-17-5 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| GlobulolCAS 489-41-8 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Pseudolimonene | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-PinocarveolCAS 1674-08-4 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 3-Methylpentanol | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Isoamyl acetate | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NerolCAS 106-25-2 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LongifoleneCAS 475-20-7 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Muurolene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexanal | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 4-methyl-Pentanol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hashishene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octanol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymenene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Piperitol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Phellandral | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| IsoledeneCAS 95910-36-4 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Nerolidol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-BisabololCAS 515-69-5 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Manool oxide | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octane Alkane | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Thuja-2,4(10)-diene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Vitex (Chasteberry) Leaf and Berry
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Vitex (Chasteberry) Leaf and Berry
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.