Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Frankincense, Somalian
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:34 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Everything you’ve come to expect from Frankincense essential oil…balsamic, resinous, lemony—multi-layered and full of depth. A welcome arrival, our 2016 batch is much deeper than the 2015 and we expect it to continue to age brilliantly. Emotionally mysterious, soothing, harmonizing. Physically helpful for respiratory and skin issues. This Frankincense is a base note, almost ethereal. I can’t wait to see what effect it will have in the blends I make using Frankincense. Safety: No known contraindications. Avoid oxidation. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certficate of Analysis: 2014 Batch No SO-0017803 Batch No. SO-0018681 Batch No. SO-20585 Batch No. SO-20430 Batch No. SO-59221 Batch No. SO-59389 (Current Batch) Boswellia carterii var Birdwell, wildcrafted resin, Somalia.
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | b52dce6809849b7240c0ddef1e6972ff | USD 22.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- 2014Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No SO-0017803Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SO-0018681Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SO-20585Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SO-20430Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SO-59221Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SO-59389 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
6 reports connected; 6 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
6 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, percentage basis, exact analysis date, batch, botanical name. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 178.04%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| alpha-pineneCAS 80-56-8 | 45.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| limoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 18.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-cymeneCAS 99-87-6 | 3.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| myrceneCAS 123-35-3 | 3.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| lsabinene | 2.95% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-caryophylleneCAS 87-44-5 | 2.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-phellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 2.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-thujiene | 1.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-pineneCAS 127-91-3 | 1.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-cadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Frankincense, Somalian
Analytical document archived for published batch SO-0018681; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Frankincense, Somalian
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.