Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Grapefruit, White

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:34 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

I’ve never cared much for white grapefruit oil–in the past, the specimens I’ve sampled have seemed bitter. There was no way I was going to put our label on THAT! I’ve always loved pink grapefruit oils that have a luscious, juicy “pop.” However, I recently received a sample of white grapefruit oil that fairly sparkles with crisp, clean citrus “goodness” and I am pleased to offer it! In all honesty, I wasn’t expecting much when this sample came in, but my beloved Organic Pink Grapefruit just wasn’t produced this year, and I knew our new Red Grapefruit, delightful as it is, lacked the astringency folks expect in a Grapefruit oil. AH… this new specimen just delighted all of us. Bright, sparkling, fresh, think of a dry champagne, perhaps. It is astringent, but not at all bitter. And it sparkles. The oil SHOULD bubble in the cylinder as we measure it. (But it doesn’t.) Following the descriptions of our pink and red grapefruit oils, inhalation of the white grapefruit variety may have the positive effect of decreasing appetite, thereby assisting in weight loss. Because of white grapefruit’s excellent toning, astringent, and diuretic effects, some believe that using diluted grapefruit oil on the skin may assist in reducing the appearance of skin cellulite or “rippling,” though I cannot say for sure. Energetically, this oil shines at refreshing the mind and promoting clarity. Diffused, it helps clear negative energy blocks, and promotes a feeling of optimism. Gabriel Mojay says use of white grapefruit oil stimulates Qi, “helping it to move, transform, eliminate” (Mojay, 1997). Safety: Robert Tisserand advises: phototoxicity (low risk); avoid use before exposing to sunlight or tanning bed, maximum dermal use 4%. Note: he also advises that though grapefruit juice interacts with many medications, grapefruit oil is “not at all likely to cause drug interactions”. (Tisserand and Young, 2014). White Grapefruit Essential Oil (Citrus paradisii) More tangy, tart, “radiant” than pink or red (primary components: d-limonene, b-myrcene, a-pinene, sabinene, d-linalool, geraniol and traces of nootkatone) Actions: Tonifying/ “activating” Qualities: Astringent, diuretic, purifying, clarifying, balancing Actions on specific body systems: Skin: Wonderful as part of a blend for oily or congested skin; some claim that it is helpful in reducing the appearance of cellulite in conjunction with a cellulite roller/fascia tool–dilute heavily and massage into skin; phototoxic warning, 4% dermal maximum. Liver/Kidneys: diuretic for liver and kidneys, tonifying; “detoxifying” Joints: rheumatic type pain associated with warm, swollen joints. Emotional/Spiritual/Energetic: Great for anxiety/ stress/fatigue as it is mentally stimulating and uplifting when diffused. Clears “negative energy” blocks; promotes optimism; refreshes the mind; promotes clarity. Stimulates Qi, “helping it to move, transform, eliminate”. (Mojay, 1997) Other uses: Superb in perfumery as it balances powerful floral no

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier siteafc508c28ed7467d9d3479ed4987e478USD 0.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

4 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 191.63%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 196.23%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 232.84%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Not reported
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
Limonene (Co-Eluting)86.51%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Limonene 1029.5086.51%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
MyrceneCAS 123-35-33.38%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrcene 989.203.38%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SabineneCAS 3387-41-51.37%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Sabinene 973.001.37%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-81.22%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Pinene 936.101.22%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-CaryophylleneCAS 87-44-50.76%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Caryophyllene 1427.140.76%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-CubebeneCAS 13744-15-50.46%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Cubebene 1390.500.46%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-20.43%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Phellandrene 1002.000.43%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-50.40%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Copaene 1379.000.40%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-10.35%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-Cadinene 1524.140.35%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Decanal 1206.570.32%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Limonene oxide 1136.000.28%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol 1141.750.25%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-Ocimene 1047.700.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Nootkatone 1807.000.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Pinene 974.000.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Linalool 1099.000.11%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Germacrene D 1484.710.11%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geranyl acetate 1379.200.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Osthole 2145.00 Coumarin0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Citronellal 1154.500.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Carvone 1248.140.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Octanal 998.000.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Terpineol 1191.710.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geraniol 1255.290.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Terpinyl acetate 1353.000.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Elemol 1538.000.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-Terpinene 1054.000.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Nonanal 1104.000.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
37 measurements in this report · 37 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Grapefruit, White

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Grapefruit, White

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.