Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Grapefruit, White
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:34 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
I’ve never cared much for white grapefruit oil–in the past, the specimens I’ve sampled have seemed bitter. There was no way I was going to put our label on THAT! I’ve always loved pink grapefruit oils that have a luscious, juicy “pop.” However, I recently received a sample of white grapefruit oil that fairly sparkles with crisp, clean citrus “goodness” and I am pleased to offer it! In all honesty, I wasn’t expecting much when this sample came in, but my beloved Organic Pink Grapefruit just wasn’t produced this year, and I knew our new Red Grapefruit, delightful as it is, lacked the astringency folks expect in a Grapefruit oil. AH… this new specimen just delighted all of us. Bright, sparkling, fresh, think of a dry champagne, perhaps. It is astringent, but not at all bitter. And it sparkles. The oil SHOULD bubble in the cylinder as we measure it. (But it doesn’t.) Following the descriptions of our pink and red grapefruit oils, inhalation of the white grapefruit variety may have the positive effect of decreasing appetite, thereby assisting in weight loss. Because of white grapefruit’s excellent toning, astringent, and diuretic effects, some believe that using diluted grapefruit oil on the skin may assist in reducing the appearance of skin cellulite or “rippling,” though I cannot say for sure. Energetically, this oil shines at refreshing the mind and promoting clarity. Diffused, it helps clear negative energy blocks, and promotes a feeling of optimism. Gabriel Mojay says use of white grapefruit oil stimulates Qi, “helping it to move, transform, eliminate” (Mojay, 1997). Safety: Robert Tisserand advises: phototoxicity (low risk); avoid use before exposing to sunlight or tanning bed, maximum dermal use 4%. Note: he also advises that though grapefruit juice interacts with many medications, grapefruit oil is “not at all likely to cause drug interactions”. (Tisserand and Young, 2014). White Grapefruit Essential Oil (Citrus paradisii) More tangy, tart, “radiant” than pink or red (primary components: d-limonene, b-myrcene, a-pinene, sabinene, d-linalool, geraniol and traces of nootkatone) Actions: Tonifying/ “activating” Qualities: Astringent, diuretic, purifying, clarifying, balancing Actions on specific body systems: Skin: Wonderful as part of a blend for oily or congested skin; some claim that it is helpful in reducing the appearance of cellulite in conjunction with a cellulite roller/fascia tool–dilute heavily and massage into skin; phototoxic warning, 4% dermal maximum. Liver/Kidneys: diuretic for liver and kidneys, tonifying; “detoxifying” Joints: rheumatic type pain associated with warm, swollen joints. Emotional/Spiritual/Energetic: Great for anxiety/ stress/fatigue as it is mentally stimulating and uplifting when diffused. Clears “negative energy” blocks; promotes optimism; refreshes the mind; promotes clarity. Stimulates Qi, “helping it to move, transform, eliminate”. (Mojay, 1997) Other uses: Superb in perfumery as it balances powerful floral no
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | afc508c28ed7467d9d3479ed4987e478 | USD 0.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. IS-58576Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IS-58615Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No.IS-58772Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IS-59081Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
4 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 191.63%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 196.23%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 232.84%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limonene (Co-Eluting) | 86.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Limonene 1029.50 | 86.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MyrceneCAS 123-35-3 | 3.38% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene 989.20 | 3.38% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 1.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sabinene 973.00 | 1.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 1.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinene 936.10 | 1.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CaryophylleneCAS 87-44-5 | 0.76% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene 1427.14 | 0.76% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CubebeneCAS 13744-15-5 | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Cubebene 1390.50 | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 0.43% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Phellandrene 1002.00 | 0.43% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 0.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Copaene 1379.00 | 0.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.35% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Cadinene 1524.14 | 0.35% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Decanal 1206.57 | 0.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Limonene oxide 1136.00 | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol 1141.75 | 0.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene 1047.70 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nootkatone 1807.00 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Pinene 974.00 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalool 1099.00 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene D 1484.71 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetate 1379.20 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Osthole 2145.00 Coumarin | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellal 1154.50 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Carvone 1248.14 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octanal 998.00 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpineol 1191.71 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geraniol 1255.29 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpinyl acetate 1353.00 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Elemol 1538.00 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Terpinene 1054.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonanal 1104.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Grapefruit, White
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Grapefruit, White
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.