Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Lavender, Mailette
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:07 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Aromatically, this is my favorite lavender oil. It has the most delightful velvety aroma. John Steele calls Mailette “the purple cloud” and after experiencing this new Mailette I can understand why. If velvet had a scent, this would be it. The Mailette is particularly high in linalyl acetate, which gives it an extra sweetness. A truly delightful oil. If you are choosing a lavender for skin care, or other therapeutic uses on the body, rather than for relaxation, I would choose our High Altitude French Lavender Oil. It is the mainstay in my anti-acne and anti-rosacea blends, and would be a good addition to any facial preparation (when it is in stock!). But for emotional use, for the aromalamp, when you want a sweet floral aroma, this specimen is exquisite. It would definitely be my second choice after the High Altitude, if cost must be the determining factor. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: 2011 / 2014 Batch No. FR-58570 Batch No. FR-58655 Batch No. FR-59043 Batch No. FR-59163 Batch No. FR-59306 Batch No. FR-59421 Batch No. FR-59428 Batch No. FR-59504 (Current Batch) Lavandula angustifolia, steam-distilled cloned flowering tops, France. – “Purple cloud” – Skin care, useful for anti-acne and anti-rosacea
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 249e428dfc3087b50f3d1b2ce1aeebdc | USD 8.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- 2011Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- 2014Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-58570Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-58655Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-59043Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-59163Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-59306Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-59421Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-59428Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-59504 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
7 reports connected; 7 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
7 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, botanical name. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 187.95%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 35.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalyl acetateCAS 115-95-7 | 33.30% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 3.98% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BorneolCAS 507-70-0 | 2.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Farnesene | 2.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octan-3-oneCAS 106-68-3 | 2.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene | 1.48% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 1.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 1.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene | 1.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octenyl-3 acetate | 1.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 0.92% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl butyrate | 0.92% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-6 | 0.80% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CamphorCAS 76-22-2 | 0.76% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl acetate | 0.72% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid) | 0.62% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neryl acetateCAS 141-12-8 | 0.62% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octen-3-olCAS 3391-86-4 | 0.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid) | 0.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 3-OctanolCAS 589-98-0 | 0.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Lavandulyl acetateCAS 25905-14-0 | 0.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NerolCAS 106-25-2 | 0.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Alloocimene | 0.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-4 | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl hexanoate | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Butyl butyrate | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-3-CareneCAS 13466-78-9 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymen-8-ol | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octan-3-yl acetate | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Hexanol | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl hexyl ether | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornyl acetateCAS 76-49-3 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl isobutyrate | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 21.36 Dihydro carveol acetate<iso-> 0.00 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 18252-46-5 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Zingiberene | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Hex-3-en-1-ol | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LavandulolCAS 498-16-8 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-CadineneCAS 39029-41-9 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl 2-methyl butanoate | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl tiglate | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Sesquisabinene hydrate | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| T-Cadinol | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TricycleneCAS 508-32-7 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Dehydroxy linalool oxide | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,8-Cineole | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-Epoxy-ocimene | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nerol oxide | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Mentha-1,5-dien-8-ol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| epi-beta-SantaleneCAS 25532-78-9 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-4 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Butyl acetate | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octanol | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Heptyl acetate | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 16.48 Isophorone<4-methlyene-> 0.00 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CarvacrolCAS 499-75-2 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CubebeneCAS 17699-14-8 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 7-epi-Sesquithujene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-FarneseneCAS 28973-97-9 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexanal | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Methyloctane Alkane | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hotrienol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 12.68 Butyl tiglate 0.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nopinone Normonoterpene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CarvoneCAS 99-49-0 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CopaeneCAS 18252-44-3 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-SesquiphellandreneCAS 20307-83-9 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Humulene epoxide IICAS 19888-34-7 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Lavender, Mailette
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Lavender, Mailette
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.