Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Cedarwood, Atlas
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:46 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Organically produced from Morocco. Excellent for easing the discomfort of any sort of respiratory ailment, either inhaled, or as a chest rub. Often used in treating dandruff and/or oily skin and scalp, and in blends to combat cellulite. Its strong antibacterial action is often recommended for treating bladder and kidney infections, and cystitis (use in sitz bath or compress). Emotionally, Cedarwood Oil can calm anxiety, and help diffuse fear. I’ve used it in “confidence building” blends. It also can enhance spirituality. Excellent for insecticide blends! This is the Cedarwood that your grandmother’s cedar chest was crafted from. Hang a bit in your closet to keep moths away from your wool clothes. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 3 to 4 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. (My experience is longer than this, but this is the official estimate.) Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. MO-014393 Batch No. MO-B255041 / MO-B255041-gc-v2 Batch No. MO-17450 Batch No. MO-21112 Batch No. MO-59169 Batch No. MY-59216 Batch No. MA-59310 Batch No. MA-59438 Batch No. MA-59516 (Current Batch) Blends With: all the Citrus Oils, with Vetiver and Sandalwood, Rose, Neroli, Rosemary, Basil, Eucalyptus, and Chamomile. An excellent base note for blends containing the “sharper” citrus oils, and nice in a man’s blend. Cedrus atlantica, organically produced, steam-distilled from wood, Morocco •Highly Antibacterial •Helpful for Dry Scalp, Skin •Emotionally calming •Insecticide blends, keep away moths
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | fbea7f23a4e3d2c55f864754cde64743 | USD 11.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. MO-014393Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MO-B255041Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- MO-B255041-gc-v2Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MO-17450Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MO-21112Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MO-59169Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MY-59216Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MA-59310Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MA-59438Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MA-59516Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
7 reports connected; 7 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
7 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, percentage basis, exact analysis date, batch, botanical name. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 215.99%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| beta-himachaleneCAS 1461-03-6 | 43.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-himachaleneCAS 3853-83-6 | 15.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-himachaleneCAS 53111-25-4 | 10.91% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-atlantone | 3.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-cadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 1.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-dehydro-ar-himachalene | 0.90% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-atlantone | 0.74% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cedrolCAS 77-53-2 | 0.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Cedarwood, Atlas
Analytical document archived for published batch MO-014393; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Cedarwood, Atlas
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.