Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Lavender, English

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:07 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

I have a new favorite. When we received this sample I fell in love with its aroma. Much less floral than our Mailette, this English lavender has almost a softly spicy note, perhaps because of its relatively higher level of linalool. What really encouraged me to import some, though, was a discussion with an online friend, an Englishman. The linalool level in this oil is higher than that of our High Altitude Lavenders, which should give this specific lavender an extra antibacterial edge. I would reach for it for acne blends, or for any of the antibacterial uses for Lavender. Its linalyl acetate is lower than any of our French oils. Which only goes to prove that we really DO NOT always know what makes an essential oil effective. There is just so much more to learn! Due to its low linalyl acetate content, I would not reach for this oil as a relaxant. I would add it to a liquid soap for a fresh invigorating morning shower. Think of it as a great addition to a cleanser…as the crisp, fresh, traditional scent of Lavender you’ve come to expect over the years. It is not floral. Because of its unusually high level of antibacterial linalool this might be the most effective true Lavender for treating problem skin, acne, or other bacterial conditions. (and treating it gently!) SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: 2013 Batch No: UK-58558 Batch No. UK-58743 Batch No. UK-58799 Batch No. UK-59160 Batch No. UK-59371 (Current Batch) Image courtesy of Steven Foster. Lavandula angustifolia, ethically farmed, steam-distilled flowering tops, Great Britain. – Soft spicy note – Anti-bacterial useful for acne or other problem skin – Relaxing

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site6ae48501e4bff21c9291c9fe1e0f6879USD 16.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Supplier report information is available
Documented

5 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, origin. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Not reported
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
ENGLAND
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
55,5 LINALOOL 44,94 20,0 –44.94%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
72,8 GERANIOL0.99%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
92,5 COUMARIN0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
3 measurements in this report · 3 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Lavender, English

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Lavender, English

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.