Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Chamomile, German
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:46 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
This delightful British German Chamomile Essential Oil has far and away the pleasantest aroma of any steam-distilled German Chamomile I have ever experienced. A deep, deep, blue oil, it should be your first choice for treating inflamed, irritated skin and is most effective diluted in a carrier oil and applied to the skin, or used in a compress. Traditionally, German Chamomile is recommended for inflammation, but where this oil excels is for treating all sorts of dry, itchy flaky skin problems. Madeleine Kerkhof-Knapp Hayes, author/educator with a nursing background specializing in palliative care, says it is the “go-to” oil for sensitive, dry-itchy, allergenic skin. (We normally use another of the “blue oils,” Blue Tansy, for allergic skin reactions…but now we have another oil in our arsenal.) Kerkhof-Knapp Hayes also recommends German Chamomile as a healing agent for oncological ulcers from radiation. I know of nothing better to add to a blend for infected skin, acne, or to blend with Lavender for sunburn. I see very little use for it in a diffuser or lamp. I put it in my grandbaby’s baby oil, along with Lavender to treat the occasional touch of diaper rash. Both of the German Chamomile oils, this distilled one or the CO2 extracted, are recommended for treating any sort of rash or skin irritation. For granulation and tissue regeneration, I would recommend this steam-distilled oil. While we traditionally haven’t thought of German Chamomile as an oil for pain relief, Madeleine Kerkhof-Hayes says it is excellent in treating nerve pain, inflammed muscles and joints, swelling, and overworked tendons and ligaments. She adds that for more effective pain relief, try combining it with the German Chamomile CO2 TOTAL Extract, as these two work well together. She also says it is useful in blends for candida (yeast), not because it is antifungal (it isn’t!), again, for the anti-inflammatory effect. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. UK-58801 Batch No. UK-59120 Batch No. UK-59270 Batch No. UK-59370 (Current batch) BLENDS WITH: Bergamot, Roman Chamomile, Geranium, Jasmine, Labdanum, Lavender, Neroli, Clary Sage, Rose, Tea Tree, and Ylangylang. Image courtesy of Steven Foster. Matricaria recutita (syn Matricaria chamomilla), ethically farmed, steam-distilled flowers, England •First choice for inflamed, irritated skin •Blends with Lavender for sunburn or diaper rash •Best for sensitive, allergenic, reactive skin •Helpful for dry, itchy, flaky skin issues
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 5db48d13ed3c9dc63a1711dbf4f9270c | USD 15.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. UK-58801Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. UK-59120Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. UK-59270Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. UK-59370 (Current batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
2 reports connected; 2 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
2 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: origin, analysis method, exact analysis date, botanical name, plant part, extraction method, batch. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 32.35 E-beta-FARNESENE | 43.30% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 152 56.32 alpha-BISABOLOL B OXIDE | 7.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 93 35.43 BICYCLOGERMACRENE | 6.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 94 36.61 E,E-alpha-FARNESENE | 5.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 158 58.23 alpha-BISABOLONE A OXIDE | 5.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 88 34.16 GERMACRENE D | 3.87% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 187 69.02 alpha-BISABOLOL A OXIDE | 3.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 186 67.98 CHAMAZULEN | 3.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 22 10.71 trans-beta-OCIMENE | 1.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 151 55.82 SPATHULENOL | 1.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 147 54.45 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 1.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 167 60.65 beta-EUDESMOL | 0.96% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 30 14.53 ARTEMISIA KETONE | 0.92% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 140 51.71 PENTADECANAL | 0.58% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 89 34.52 beta-SELINENE | 0.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 149 55.36 SANTALOL ISOMER | 0.49% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 154 56.72 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2 5.48 alpha-PINENE | 0.43% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 153 56.53 PENTADECANONE, TRIMETHYL- | 0.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 165 60.22 alpha-BISABOLOL | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 65 27.66 beta-CARYOPHYLLENE | 0.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 19 10.10 cis-beta-OCIMENE | 0.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 52 24.33 alpha-ISOCOMENE | 0.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 73 30.41 ALLO-AROMADENDRENE | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 121 46.18 DENDROLASIN | 0.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 79 31.67 alpha-HUMULENE | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 171 61.75 BERGAMOTOL ISOMER | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 141 51.87 NEROLIDOL | 0.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 168 60.77 BISABOLOL OXIDE ISOMER | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 47 22.54 alpha-COPAENE | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 98 37.48 COMPOUND Mw=202 | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 148 55.22 SANTALOL ISOMER | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 192 78.19 PHYTOL | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 24 11.87 TERPINOLENE | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 46 22.25 BICYCLOELEMENE | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 115 44.01 SESQUIROSEFURAN | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 17 9.90 FURAN, 2-PENTYL- | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 21 10.54 gamma-TERPINENE | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 166 60.50 alpha-NOOTKATOL | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 44 21.44 PENTADECANE | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 92 35.17 beta-BISABOLENE | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 138 51.16 AROMATIC COMPOUND Mw=178 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 188 69.29 BENZOIC ACID | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 195 89.17 trans-TONGHAOSU | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 14 9.09 LIMONENE 0.15 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 86 33.48 LEDENE | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 178 65.10 TRICOSANE | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 23 11.37 p-CYMENE | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 38 17.95 YOMOGI ALCOHOL | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 35 17.02 2-METHYLBUTYL ANGELATE | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 101 38.13 alpha-CURCUMENE | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 104 38.87 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 34 16.95 NONANAL | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 191 74.57 PENTACOSANE | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 49 23.65 ARTEMISIA ALCOHOL | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 64 27.45 beta-ELEMENE | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 134 50.16 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 146 54.11 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 15 9.39 1,8-CINEOLE | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 82 32.84 alpha-ACORADIENE | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 123 46.40 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 139 51.29 LEDOL | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 156 57.40 BISABOLOL OXIDE ISOMER | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 69 28.43 AROMADENDRENE | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 90 34.88 alpha-ZINGIBERENE | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 3 5.77 ETHYL 2-METHYLBUTYRATE | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 26 12.21 ISOBUTYL ANGELATE | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 51 24.12 MODHEPHENE | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 53 24.40 COMPOUND Mw=180 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 84 33.16 gamma-CURCUMENE | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 91 35.06 alpha-MUUROLENE | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 106 39.94 SESQUITERPENE Mw=202 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 111 40.98 SESQUITERPENE Mw=202 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 129 49.14 BERGAMOTOL ISOMER | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 144 53.39 GLOBULOL | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1 4.63 1-NONENE | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 29 14.10 5-HEPTEN-2-ONE, 6-METHYL- | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 40 20.22 alpha-CUBEBENE | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 77 30.91 SESQUITERPENE | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 112 42.06 E-GERANYL ACETONE | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 117 45.16 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 125 46.96 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 180 65.72 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 182 66.55 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 105 39.76 2,4-DECADIENAL | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 124 46.64 IONONE ISOMER | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 145 53.72 VIRIDIFLOROL | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 155 57.00 T-CADINOL | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 175 64.05 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 7 6.85 beta-PINENE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 8 7.09 SABINENE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 11 7.99 beta-MYRCENE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 16 9.45 beta-PHELLANDRENE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 27 12.39 trans-2-(2-PENTENYL)FURAN | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 36 17.12 TETRADECANE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 41 20.89 alpha-LONGIPINENE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 42 20.96 SILPHINENE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 62 26.64 OXIDE COMPOUND | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 83 33.01 gamma-MUUROLENE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 96 36.82 gamma-CADINENE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 100 37.88 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 110 40.76 COMPOUND Mw=196 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 128 48.44 CARYOPHYLLENE EPOXIDE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 135 50.55 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 137 51.11 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 150 55.48 BISABOLOL C OXIDE | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 159 58.29 delta-CADINOL | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 9 7.40 PROPYL 2-METHYLBUTYRATE | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 12 8.24 TERPENE ISOMER | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 39 20.17 ALIPHATIC ALCOHOL | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 50 24.03 alpha-GURJUNENE | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 54 24.60 beta1-CUBEBENE | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 58 25.72 PINOCARVONE | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 71 28.83 THUYOPSENE | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 72 30.06 PREZIZA-7-ENE | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 74 30.53 SAFRANAL | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 87 33.94 MUUROLADIENE ISOMER | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 95 36.66 delta-CADINENE | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 99 37.68 trans-alpha-BISABOLENE | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 102 38.61 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 116 44.19 alpha-CALACORENE | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 119 45.95 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 132 49.87 CHRYSANTHEMOL ISOMER | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 157 57.93 EUGENOL 0.04 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 160 58.57 COMPOUND Mw=222 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 161 58.63 SESQUITERPENOL | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 169 60.89 SESQUITERPENOL | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 172 62.71 CAPRIC ACID | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 179 65.39 COMPOUND Mw=220 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 193 80.96 MYRISTIC ACID | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 13 8.64 HEPTANAL | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 31 14.66 1-HEXANOL | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 55 24.64 beta-MAALIENE | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 57 25.55 1-OCTANOL | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 60 26.43 epsilon-CADINENE | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 61 26.51 beta-ISOCOMENE | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 67 27.96 TERPINENE-4-OL | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 75 30.69 ARTEMISIA ALCOHOL ISOMER | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 97 36.96 SESQUITERPENE Mw=202 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 107 39.99 COMPOUND Mw=220 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 108 40.46 OXIDE COMPOUND | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 109 40.49 NAPHTALENIC COMPOUND | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 122 46.34 PALUSTROL | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 127 48.03 CURCUMENIC COMPOUND | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 133 50.10 ALIPHATIC ALCOHOL | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 136 50.93 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 142 52.40 AROMATIC COMPOUND Mw=200 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 143 52.74 KETONIC COMPOUND | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 162 59.23 COMPOUND Mw=206 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 163 59.47 SESQUITERPENOL | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 176 64.55 MATRICARIA ESTER | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 177 64.73 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 189 70.68 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 194 82.81 HEPTACOSANE | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 4 5.99 CAMPHENE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 5 6.31 HEXANAL | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6 6.73 UNDECANE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 10 7.62 ALIPHATIC ALCOHOL | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 18 10.04 TERPENE ISOMER | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20 10.45 PHENOLIC COMPOUND Mw=122 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 25 12.11 TRIDECANE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 28 13.54 cis-3-HEXENYL ACETATE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 32 15.76 ALIPHATIC ESTER | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 33 16.67 ISOAMYL ANGELATE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 37 17.91 COMPOUND Mw=150 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 43 21.17 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 45 21.75 OCTYL ACETATE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 48 22.88 DECANAL | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 56 24.96 LINALOOL 0.02 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 59 25.78 COMPOUND Mw=162 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 63 27.21 alpha-trans-BERGAMOTENE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 66 27.86 COMPOUND Mw=152 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 68 28.34 SESQUITERPENE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 70 28.80 LAVANDULYL ACETATE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 76 30.85 trans-PINOCARVEOL | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 78 31.38 1-NONANOL | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 81 32.66 SESQUITERPENE Mw=202 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 85 33.36 Z-beta-FARNESENE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 103 38.66 AROMATIC COMPOUND | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 113 42.28 PHENYLMETHYL ISOVALERATE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 114 43.94 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 118 45.64 TERPENIC ESTER | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 120 46.05 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 126 47.24 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 130 49.41 SESQUITERPENOL | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 131 49.66 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 164 59.64 COMPOUND Mw=250 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 170 61.10 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 173 63.18 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 174 63.63 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 181 66.19 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 183 66.85 COMPOUND Mw=218 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 184 67.63 AROMATIC COMPOUND Mw=234 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 185 67.76 SESQUITERPENIC EPOXIDE | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 190 72.17 LAURIC ACID | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 196 90.55 PALMITIC ACID | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Chamomile, German
Analytical document archived for published batch UK-59270; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Chamomile, German
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.