Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Lavender CO2
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:07 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
The process of CO2 Extraction gives an oil closer aromatically to the fresh blossom than any steam-distilled oil can. When ordering our last batch of CO2’s from our Bulgarian producer, I requested a sample of his Lavender Select extraction. And I fell in love. This CO2 select extracted from FRESH Bulgarian lavender blossoms is without a doubt the most exquisite Lavender I have ever experienced. If you want to scent your room, your linens, yourself with an absolutely beautiful, fresh floral lavender oil, this is the one for you. Please order while supplies last. This CO2 extraction is truly an exquisite aromatic! We have offered Lavender CO2 extract in the past, and I bragged on its aroma, but this far surpasses our earlier offering, which was produced from the dried blossoms, rather than the fresh. Who knew there would be such a difference? Use in normal aromatherapy dilutions. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No: BU-48463 Batch No: GE-741402 Batch No: BU-LACOSE-16 Batch No. BU-58602 Batch No. BU-58949 Batch No. BU-58986 Lavandula angustifolia, CO2 extract, organically grown and extracted in Bulgaria. – extracted from FRESH Bulgarian blossoms – Exquisite aroma
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 479dd14b9788de7c8cc352cdac155f11 | USD 22.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No: BU-48463Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No: GE-741402Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No: BU-LACOSE-16Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. BU-58602Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. BU-58949Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. BU-58986Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
4 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, origin, analysis method, batch, percentage basis, exact analysis date, extraction method. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentages describe an extract fraction, not the whole product. The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linalyl acetate 1263.80 | 44.84% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalool 1099.00 | 22.64% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene 1427.14 | 4.66% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Farnesene 1453.40 | 4.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Lavandulyl acetate 1285.00 | 4.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene 1037.80 | 3.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol 1180.57 | 2.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene 1047.70 | 1.99% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octan-3-one 981.00 | 1.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Borneol 1168.71 | 1.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octenyl-3 acetate 1107.00 | 1.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Limonene 1029.50 | 0.76% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Alloocimene 1129.90 | 0.74% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene D 1484.71 | 0.73% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene 989.20 | 0.69% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,8-Cineole 1031.80 | 0.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetate 1379.20 | 0.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxide 1594.86 | 0.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Cryptone 1187.33 | 0.30% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl acetate 1009.00 | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 3-Octanol 992.00 | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neryl acetate 1362.90 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octen-3-ol 980.00 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octan-3-yl acetate 1124.00 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinene 936.10 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl butyrate 1186.80 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Camphor 1147.55 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-Bergamotene 1435.00 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| T-Cadinol 1640.43 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Camphene 950.30 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-3-Carene 1008.00 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene 1092.10 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid) 1092.20 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid) 1075.10 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Cadinene 1524.14 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene 1024.30 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Thujene 927.80 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Terpinene 1054.00 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sabinene 973.00 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Pinene 974.00 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tricyclene 923.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Lavender CO2
Analytical document archived for published batch GE-741402; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Lavender CO2
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.