Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
White Sage
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:12 PM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
When I talked with our new supplier of White Sage essential oil (and soon hydrosol) my heart sang. He told me stories of their family farm in California, and how connected with the indigenous community they are. Mutual respect and gratitude was evident. Once we were informed that this precious sage was grown sustainably on a certified organic, family owned farm, we knew we had to have it. The white sage market has little evidence of growers, but a lot of vendors selling “wild harvested” sage from the “hills of California”. This should present a red flag to anyone valuing sustainable sourcing. Poaching of wild white sage for commercial sale has threatened the plant’s survival in recent years. Indigenous communities have had a relationship with white sage for thousands of generations. This California native species of sage faces endangerment due to rampant illegal poaching of its wild populations. Revered for its profound cultural significance, it has long been used by Native peoples of Southern California and Mexico, in medicine and sacred ceremonies. We are grateful to have discovered this trustworthy, protected source. When the local tribal elders put their faith in this growers efforts we know we can too, and are honored to share it with you. It is the sage most often used in Native American rituals, for smudging, and if, for some reason it is not appropriate to burn the actual herb, then perhaps misting with a spray of this powerful oil would be appropriate. The energy of the oil is amazing. With that said, like all true sages, White Sage is a powerful antibacterial and deodorizer. We would recommend its use for eliminating airborne germs/viruses and purification of your surroundings. White Sage, in particular, is also said to be calming and de-stressing. If diffusing essential oils is not a convenient method for you, you may enjoy the ease of use that hydrosols provide. My daughter uses them in her dorm room and her roommate loves her for it. Please note: If you compare analysis of past batches, this US grown was harvested in Southern California at close to sea level. The Canadian we offered many years ago was a High Altitude crop. We have always been taught that High Altitude Sages are lower in camphor. We had forgotten that the converse of this is that low altitude Sages are higher in camphor. To our noses, it smells exactly like White Sage should smell. It is a beautiful specimen. Blends well with: WARNING: AVOID during PREGNANCY! **For other possible oils to avoid, please see our Contraindications page. Our easy to use White Sage Hydrosol is available on our Aromatherapy Hydrosols page. GC/MS Analysis: Batch No. US-59447 (Current Batch) Salvia apiana, steam distilled, organically farmed, California US sustainably grown on private farm ceremonial, spiritual cleansing and calming high in camphor
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 17009 | USD 13.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. US-59447 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
1 report connected; 1 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
1 source document archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,8-Cineole | 31.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CamphorCAS 76-22-2 | 27.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 6.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 5.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 4.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 2.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 2.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-3-CareneCAS 13466-78-9 | 2.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 1.94% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BorneolCAS 507-70-0 | 1.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-CadineneCAS 39029-41-9 | 0.89% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene | 0.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.75% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene | 0.72% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 0.72% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| ortho-Cymene | 0.65% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 0.54% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| T-MuurololCAS 19912-62-0 | 0.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-4 | 0.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.43% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Muurolene | 0.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 0.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 0.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 0.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene | 0.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z,E)-alpha-Farnesene | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-0 | 0.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Cadinene | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-GurjuneneCAS 489-40-7 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Cadina-1(6),4-dieneCAS 20085-11-4 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CadinolCAS 481-34-5 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornyl acetateCAS 76-49-3 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octen-3-olCAS 3391-86-4 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Alloocimene | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CubebeneCAS 17699-14-8 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Muurola-3,5-diene | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-EudesmolCAS 473-15-4 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-BisabololCAS 515-69-5 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| AromadendreneCAS 489-39-4 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Pseudolimonene | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-5 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TricycleneCAS 508-32-7 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CopaeneCAS 18252-44-3 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-SelineneCAS 17066-67-0 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Cadina-1,4-dieneCAS 38758-02-0 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-6 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| JunenolCAS 472-07-1 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Muurola-4(14),5-diene | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-epi-Bicyclosesquiphellandrene | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-JasmoneCAS 488-10-8 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Muurola-3,5-diene | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,10-di-epi-Cubenol | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 36.31 Shyobunol 0.00 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CadineneCAS 523-47-7 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Isoterpinolene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymen-8-ol | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Farnesene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BisaboleneCAS 25532-79-0 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene D-4-ol | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 44.11 Isopimara-9(11),15-diene 0.00 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hashishene | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hotrienol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranylacetone | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octan-3-oneCAS 106-68-3 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Fenchol | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Camphene hydrateCAS 465-31-6 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl tiglate | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CubebeneCAS 13744-15-5 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-AmorpheneCAS 189165-79-5 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| GlobulolCAS 489-41-8 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-MuurololCAS 104245-48-9 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| PogostolCAS 21698-41-9 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymenene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-NonanoneCAS 821-55-6 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Isoborneol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NerolCAS 106-25-2 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.88 Hexenyl tiglate<3E-> 0.00 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-YlangeneCAS 14912-44-8 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-CaryophylleneCAS 118-65-0 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-4 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexanal | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-2-Hexenal | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Hex-3-en-1-ol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornylene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Thuja-2,4(10)-diene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Carene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 12.70 Ocimene<allo-> 0.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Limonene oxideCAS 4959-35-7 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| PinocarvoneCAS 30460-92-5 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Piperitol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| PiperitoneCAS 89-81-6 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Carvone | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CarvacrolCAS 499-75-2 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| EugenolCAS 97-53-0 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 23.08 Undecenol<2E-> 0.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl (E)-cinnamate Phenylpropanoid | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LongifoleneCAS 475-20-7 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-CalameneneCAS 73209-42-4 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene BCAS 15423-57-1 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Gleenol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| ViridiflorolCAS 552-02-3 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- White Sage
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - White Sage
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.