Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Frankincense, Indian (Serrata)
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:34 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
The oldest known Frankincense oil (and most likely the Frankincense mentioned in the Bible), this is the traditional Frankincense used in Ayurvedic medicine. There is little information available about the uses of this lovely oil. Powdered extracts of the resin are being used as anti-inflammatories…whether the EO will prove useful in this manner remains to be seen. It is very different from the more available Boswellia carterii in both effects and in aroma. Lighter, much more of a middle or heart note than a base note. A complex aroma, initially a bit sharp but with a lovely dry down in a scent blend. I see it as a glorious heart note bridging the lighter florals and/or citrus notes to a deep anchoring scent. Safety: No known contraindications. Avoid oxidation. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. See the GC/MS Analysis here. Batch IN-58592 Batch #IN-58763 Batch # IN-58921 Batch #IN-59015 Batch #IN-59149 Batch #IN-59282 Batch #IN-59462 (Current Batch) Image courtesy of Steven Foster. Boswellia serrata, wildcrafted, resin distilled in India.
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | d74b3efb3fea1956929f85f841480e99 | USD 12.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- hereBatch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch IN-58592Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch #IN-58763Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch # IN-58921Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch #IN-59015Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch #IN-59149Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch #IN-59282Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch #IN-59462 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
6 reports connected; 6 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
6 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, extraction method, botanical name. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 217.81%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 43.99% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-3-CareneCAS 13466-78-9 | 11.90% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 7.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 6.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 6.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-CymeneCAS 99-87-6 | 5.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 3.55% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 3.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MyrceneCAS 123-35-3 | 2.64% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 2.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl chavicolCAS 140-67-0 | 1.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.98% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,8-CineoleCAS 470-82-6 | 0.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-olCAS 562-74-3 | 0.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Thuja-2,4(10)-diene | 0.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,4-CineoleCAS 470-67-7 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujoneCAS 546-80-5 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BourboneneCAS 5208-59-3 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3338-55-4 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TerpinoleneCAS 586-62-9 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hashishene | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3779-61-1 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Pseudolimonene | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Carene | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-5 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Toluene Simple Phenolic | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| FenchoneCAS 1195-79-5 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Sabinol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-isocitral | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-para-Mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Kessane | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-3,5-heptadien-2-one | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Alloocimene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LongifoleneCAS 475-20-7 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl eugenolCAS 93-15-2 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-ThujoneCAS 471-15-8 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Mentha-1,5-dien-8-olCAS 1686-20-0 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornylene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinene oxide | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-VerbenolCAS 1820-09-3 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymen-8-olCAS 1197-01-9 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-IsocitralCAS 72203-98-6 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalyl acetateCAS 115-95-7 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpinyl acetateCAS 80-26-2 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-4 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CopaeneCAS 18252-44-3 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-0 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Frankincense, Indian (Serrata)
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Frankincense, Indian (Serrata)
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.