Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Lavender, High Altitude, Wild
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:07 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Grown high in the French Alps of Haut Provence, harvested and distilled at over 1400 meters to allow lower temperatures and, of course, much lower pressure, so more of the volatile phytochemicals come through in the oil. This is truly the benchmark…what French Lavender should be, but so seldom is. Our finest Lavender. An amazing aromatic experience. Aromatically and energetically amazing! a true Lavender Sauvage. Years ago I remember Dr. Chistoph Streicher discussing the vibrancy and power of wildcrafted oils as opposed to those grown under any form of cultivation. This amazing new Lavender proves his theory! Aromatically deeper and more intense than the Lavender Mailette, this lovely specimen gave us all goosebumps. Those of you using the oils energetically must try some! SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: 2014, 2013 Batch No. FR-58557 Batch No. FR-58535 Batch No. FR-58686 Batch No. FR-59020 Batch No. FR-59258 Batch No. FR-59305 Batch No. FR-59532 (Current Batch) Lavandula angustifolia (Lavender vera), wild-crafted, from population (Lavender vera, Lavender fine, Lavender Sauvage), France. – Amazing energetics – A must try for Lavender lovers
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | d55ba6a45326c967bb999e6571db6a3a | USD 22.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- 2014Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- 2013Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-58557Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-58535Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-58686Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-59020Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-59258Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-59305Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-59532Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
5 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, analysis method, exact analysis date, origin, batch, botanical name. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 178.27%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linalool (30.00%-45.00%) | 37.63% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalyl acetate (33.00%-46.00%) | 34.91% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 3.58% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpineol (0.50%-1.50%) | 2.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MentholCAS 89-78-1 | 2.56% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 2.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 1.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| IsopinocamphoneCAS 473-62-1 | 1.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 1.42% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neryl acetateCAS 141-12-8 | 1.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Limonene (0.00%-0.30%) | 1.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene (0.00%-2.00%) | 0.98% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene (0.00%-2.50%) | 0.83% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NerolCAS 106-25-2 | 0.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| ViridiflorolCAS 552-02-3 | 0.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,8-Cineole (0.00%-0.50%) | 0.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octan-3-yl acetate | 0.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octenyl-3 acetate | 0.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Elemol | 0.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MenthoneCAS 89-80-5 | 0.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| IsomenthoneCAS 491-07-6 | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Alloocimene | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-FarneseneCAS 28973-97-9 | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Menthyl acetateCAS 16409-45-3 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-6 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-9 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl chavicolCAS 140-67-0 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CarvoneCAS 99-49-0 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid) | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid) | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 30.24 Liguloxide | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octen-3-olCAS 3391-86-4 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MyrtenalCAS 564-94-3 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrtenyl acetateCAS 1079-01-2 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 22.30 Carvomenthyl acetate<neoiso-> Unknown | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 22.69 Dihydro carveol acetate<neoiso-> Unknown | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-9 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-EudesmolCAS 1209-71-8 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-EudesmolCAS 473-15-4 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| PulegoneCAS 89-82-7 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-EudesmolCAS 473-16-5 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-3-Hexenyl butyrate | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BourboneneCAS 5208-59-3 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-JasmoneCAS 488-10-8 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CopaeneCAS 18252-44-3 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2,5-Diethyltetrahydrofuran | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl acetate | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranial | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Dehydroxy linalool oxide | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Dehydroxylinalool oxide | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| PiperitoneCAS 89-81-6 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Nerolidol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Methylbutyl alcohol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hotrienol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| IsopulegolCAS 89-79-2 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 19.64 Linalool oxide acetate<trans->(pyranoid) Unknown | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-0 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Muurolene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Lavender, High Altitude, Wild
Analytical document archived for published batch FR-59532; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Lavender, High Altitude, Wild
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.