Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Marjoram, Sweet
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Marjoram’s aroma is slightly spicy, warm and soothing. It blends well with Orange, Eucalyptus (softening it, somewhat) and Lavender. I sometimes blend it with Clary Sage, especially for menstrual difficulties. Marjoram Oil has been used to lower high blood pressure. It warms the skin, where applied. Marjoram’s powerful antispasmodic action can ease pains of arthritis, cramped muscles, muscle spasms, and menstrual cramps. (Try blending with Clary Sage for relieving menstrual cramps; the result is almost magical!) It has a calming, slightly sedative action and can be effective against some types of migraines. Educator and author Madeleine Kerkhof-Knapp Hayes advises use of anti-oxidant and antibacterial Sweet Marjoram for any sort of skin infection. She says add to bandaid/bandage, use to cover the wound (i.e, add to the dressing, not directly to the wound itself.)She further suggests its use for infected wounds, necrotic tissue (to help with the smell) ulcers and abscesses. Madeleine recommends a blend of Lavender, Helichrysum, Geranium and Sweet Marjoram to add to wound dressings, to clear infections and speed healing. Sweet Marjoram mixes well with Lavender or Rosewood or English Chamomile for a very relaxing bath. WARNING: This oil can stimulate menstrual flow, and thus should never be used during pregnancy. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. See the GC/MS Analyses: Mar 2015 EG-B605001 EG-16966 EG-58953 EG-59201 EG-59377 (Current Batch) Origanum majorana, ethically farmed, steam-distilled flowers and leaves, Egypt. – Powerful anti-spasmodic – Calming, slighty sedative action – Useful for migraines – Use for anti-oxidant and antibacterials actions for skin infections
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | b81d0e74b499db078d6b289f5f96a38d | USD 18.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Mar 2015Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- EG-B605001Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- EG-16966Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- EG-58953Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- EG-59201Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- EG-59377Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
5 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, percentage basis, exact analysis date, batch, botanical name. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| terpinene-1-ol-4 | 23.79% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-sabinene hydrate | 14.99% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-terpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 13.92% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-terpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 8.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| sabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 7.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-5 | 3.92% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| terpinolene | 3.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-terpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 3.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| limoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 2.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-caryophyllene | 2.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| myrcene | 2.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cineol-1.8 and beta-phellandrene | 1.96% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-cymene | 1.55% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| linalyl acetateCAS 115-95-7 | 1.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis para-menth-2-en-1-ol | 1.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| linaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 1.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-pineneCAS 80-56-8 | 0.80% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-pineneCAS 127-91-3 | 0.43% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Marjoram, Sweet
Analytical document archived for published batch EG-16966; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Marjoram, Sweet
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.