Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Marjoram, Sweet

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Marjoram’s aroma is slightly spicy, warm and soothing. It blends well with Orange, Eucalyptus (softening it, somewhat) and Lavender. I sometimes blend it with Clary Sage, especially for menstrual difficulties. Marjoram Oil has been used to lower high blood pressure. It warms the skin, where applied. Marjoram’s powerful antispasmodic action can ease pains of arthritis, cramped muscles, muscle spasms, and menstrual cramps. (Try blending with Clary Sage for relieving menstrual cramps; the result is almost magical!) It has a calming, slightly sedative action and can be effective against some types of migraines. Educator and author Madeleine Kerkhof-Knapp Hayes advises use of anti-oxidant and antibacterial Sweet Marjoram for any sort of skin infection. She says add to bandaid/bandage, use to cover the wound (i.e, add to the dressing, not directly to the wound itself.)She further suggests its use for infected wounds, necrotic tissue (to help with the smell) ulcers and abscesses. Madeleine recommends a blend of Lavender, Helichrysum, Geranium and Sweet Marjoram to add to wound dressings, to clear infections and speed healing. Sweet Marjoram mixes well with Lavender or Rosewood or English Chamomile for a very relaxing bath. WARNING: This oil can stimulate menstrual flow, and thus should never be used during pregnancy. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. See the GC/MS Analyses: Mar 2015 EG-B605001 EG-16966 EG-58953 EG-59201 EG-59377 (Current Batch) Origanum majorana, ethically farmed, steam-distilled flowers and leaves, Egypt. – Powerful anti-spasmodic – Calming, slighty sedative action – Useful for migraines – Use for anti-oxidant and antibacterials actions for skin infections

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier siteb81d0e74b499db078d6b289f5f96a38dUSD 18.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Supplier report information is available
Documented

5 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, percentage basis, exact analysis date, batch, botanical name. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
EG-16966
Report botanical identity
Origanum majorana
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · unspecified
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
terpinene-1-ol-423.79%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-sabinene hydrate14.99%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-terpineneCAS 99-85-413.92%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-terpineneCAS 99-86-58.47%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
sabineneCAS 3387-41-57.20%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-53.92%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
terpinolene3.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-terpineolCAS 98-55-53.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
limoneneCAS 138-86-32.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-caryophyllene2.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
myrcene2.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cineol-1.8 and beta-phellandrene1.96%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-cymene1.55%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
linalyl acetateCAS 115-95-71.41%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis para-menth-2-en-1-ol1.40%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
linaloolCAS 78-70-61.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-pineneCAS 80-56-80.80%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-pineneCAS 127-91-30.43%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
18 measurements in this report · 18 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Marjoram, Sweet

    Analytical document archived for published batch EG-16966; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Marjoram, Sweet

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.