Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Guava Leaf
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:34 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
New to us, Guava Leaf Essential Oil from Thailand. Fascinating with multi-faceted uses, recent research (last five years) is revealing much promise and discovery; particularly potent action as antimicrobial, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antifungal. From the Myrtaceae (Myrtle) family of plants, exhibits a pale yellow appearance, with an initial woody aroma and an underlying “hint of mint,” (some say “hint of almond”). Upon dry down the mint comes to the forefront and the woody scent seems to lighten a bit. Everyone at Nature’s Gift who has experienced it reacts similarly with a puzzled look on their faces and then, “I think I smell mint.” Make no mistake it is a very different aroma than fruit or bark. Something about it reminds me (Christi) of Palo Santo. High in b (beta) carophyllene and d-limonene, with 1,8 cineole, and other unique naturally occurring components, Guava Leaf originated on the American continents (North/South) in the tropics, particularly Central and South America, as well as Hawaii. The small scrubby bush blooms with white flowers before bearing its greenish apple resembling fruit, thus earning the nickname “Apple Guava.” In recent years Guava has been transplanted into parts of Asia with much success where the tea leaves are known for relieving diarrhea, bloating, and cramps. While we often see Guava Leaf Essential Oil described as best used for diarrhea, stomach ailments, dysentery; we think it is of key importance to remind ourselves that documented research points to drinking a tea made of the leaves containing some 10% tannins, for this purpose, which is an herbal use versus an essential oil use. Since tannins are water soluble, we are not sure they would actually survive the steam distillation process from which the essential oil is produced. Now, the hydrosol would/should contain the tannins (if one exists), but we believe the oil is less likely to retain this compound. (Phenols contained within the oil are antioxidant, however, and may be helpful.) Can be used in a cream or lotion to combat athlete’s foot, as well as for pain relief caused by inflammation. Reportedly specifically helpful against staph aureus most often found in the nose or on the skin. Research indicates it could be an oil to try for minor skin infections such as boils, cysts, and folliculitis. According to a 2010 study published in the International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research (IJCPR), Guava Leaf Essential Oil exhibited a broad spectrum antifungal activity, and could prove useful in a cream or lotion for athlete’s foot. In 2012, a Bangkok, Thailand study reported on antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antibacterial effects of the leaf oil, saying it was particularly effective against staph aureus. If you search reputable journals or nih.gov for recent research, there is quite a bit of information about Guava Leaf Essential Oil and its potential uses. It is a middle note and may blend well with citruses such as Lemon, Oran
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 98b07f57efa2d6700d9419fd9359be09 | USD 0.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. TH-48605Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TH-58846Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
2 reports connected; 2 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
2 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 175.50%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limonene 1029.50 | 22.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene 1427.14 | 21.90% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinene 936.10 | 12.75% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Globulol 1593.50 | 5.73% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Aromadendrene 1449.80 | 5.00% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Bisabolene 1502.00 | 3.66% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Copaene 1379.00 | 3.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Bisabolene 1509.86 | 2.83% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene 1461.43 | 2.75% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Cadinene 1524.14 | 2.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Nerolidol 1567.00 | 1.30% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| allo-Aromadendrene 1471.00 | 1.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| T-Cadinol 1640.43 | 0.90% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Cadinene 1515.29 | 0.66% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Selinene 1487.57 | 0.62% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene 1037.80 | 0.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Muurolol 1649.33 | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,10-di-epi-Cubenol 1612.29 | 0.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Viridiflorol 1596.00 | 0.42% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpineol 1191.71 | 0.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| T-Muurolol 1643.29 | 0.35% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Bisabolene 1535.65 | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Italicene 1401.10 | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene 989.20 | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Cadinol 1655.00 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Bisabolol 1684.43 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Gurjunene 1433.00 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Pinene 974.00 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Ledol 1623.00 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene 1024.30 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene 1047.70 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinocarveol 1143.75 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Gurjunene 1412.00 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Terpinene 1054.00 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol 1180.57 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Camphene 950.30 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Phellandrene 1002.00 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalool 1099.00 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hashishene 922.00 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Guava Leaf
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Guava Leaf
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.