Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Bay Laurel

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:46 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Historically, the leaves of the bay laurel were used to crown the victor. This essential oil derived from bay leaves used in cooking has a wonderfully spicy aroma. Laurel is an antibacterial oil, specifically recommended in a steam inhalation for tonsillitis or added to any cold and flu blend. It is said to be strongly anti-viral, as well. Some resources recommend its use in combatting or preventing any virus which attacks the respiratory system. Bay Laurel can be an interesting addition to hair care blends, said to be an excellent remedy for hair and scalp, stimulating hair growth and clearing dandruff. There are those who recommend it for treating acne, as well. Emotionally, it is both uplifting and grounding, helping to clear mental confusion and clarify thought processes. As such, it might be an effective addition to a study blend. Dr. Kurt Schnaubelt recommends it as a lymphatic stimulant and says it is the oil of choice for treating swollen glands. It is also recommended as an immune stimulant. I love to add it to blends using the more “medicinal smelling” oils (in my opinion … Tea Tree, Manuka, Saro, etc.) because its aroma makes them more palatable. I have used it to cook with, adding a couple of drops to a pot of gumbo when I was out of the required bay leaves. Yummy! I recommend it in any recipe calling for bay leaves … saves fishing them out, and gives a more vital flavor. My pagan friends say laurel will bring money… put a drop on a bingo card and you are guaranteed to win. WARNING: Avoid using when pregnant, and please be careful using in skin blends: it is both irritating and sensitizing, used unwisely. However it is very effective as a minor component of a blend. Avoid use of Bay Laurel if you are on anti-coagulant therapy (blood thinners). Robert Tisserand advises potentially carcinogenic based on methyleugenol content; essential oils high in 1,8 cineole can cause CNS and breathing problems in young children; skin sensitization (low risk); mucous membrane irritation (low risk). Maximum dermal use Tisserand 0.5%, IFRA 0.01% SHELF LIFE: Approximately 3 to 4 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. **For other possible oils to avoid, please see our Contraindications page. Certificate of Analysis: 2014 Batch No. GR-15291 Batch No. GR-15488 Batch No. MO-B516034 Batch No. MO-B516035 Batch No. MO-58888 Batch No. CR-59037 Batch No. HR-59308 (Current Batch) BLENDS WITH: Benzoin, Citrus Oils, Black Pepper, Cardamom, Cinnamon, Clove Bud, Coriander, Cypress, Eucalyptus, Frankincense, Geranium, Ginger, Juniper, Lavender, Peppermint, Rosemary, Ylangylang. One of the nicest bars of soap for a man that I’ve ever smelled was a simple blend of Bay Laurel and Atlas Cedarwood. YUMMY. (No I don’t know the proportions, I wasn’t the soapmaker.) Laurus nobilis, wildcrafted, steam-distilled leaves, from Croatia. Sometimes called “Laurel Leaf” Oil.

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site792c3443e64beb7a06b979f5a4abf4a8USD 20.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Supplier report information is available
Documented

5 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, exact analysis date, batch. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
GR-15488
Report botanical identity
Laurus nobilis
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
20.851 1,8-Cineole42.75%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
42.475 Terpinyl acetate <beta>14.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
25.382 Linalool12.58%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
16.900 Sabinene4.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
45.880 Methyleugenol4.29%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
20.560 Limonene3.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
14.571 Pinene <alpha>2.81%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
17.247 Pinene <beta->2.52%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
42.747 Eugenol2.21%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
20.228 Cymene <para->1.78%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
22.491 Terpinene <gamma>1.48%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
31.116 Terpinen-4-ol1.46%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
32.113 Terpineol <alpha>1.39%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
42.573 Terpinyl acetate <alpha>0.88%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
17.837 Myrcene0.56%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
19.706 Terpinene <alpha->0.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
19.020 Phellandrene <alpha->0.33%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
15.561 Camphene0.31%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
38.288 Bornyl acetate0.29%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
47.297 Caryophyllene <trans>0.21%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
21.615 Ocimene <E-beta>0.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
24.375 Terpinolene0.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
23.329 Sabinene hydrate <cis>0.16%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
34.057 Nerol0.16%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
40.204 Ocimenyl acetate0.16%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
32.295 Methyl chavicol0.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
14.098 Thujene <alpha->0.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
38.765 2-Undecanone0.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
35.790 Linalyl acetate0.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
43.120 Neryl acetate0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
45.293 Elemene <beta->0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
18.641 Isobutyl 2-methylbutyrate0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
24.675 2-Nonanone0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
40.859 Myrtenyl acetate0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
10.429 Hex-3(Z)-enol0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
13.318 Isobutyl isobutyrate0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
19.170 3-Carene0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
30.534 2-Bornanol0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
10.333 Isovalerate <ethyl->0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
12.604 2-Heptanol0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
9.794 Butyrate <isopropyl->0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
10.145 Butyrate <2-methyl-, ethyl->0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
13.960 Tricyclene0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
15.445 Fenchene <alpha>0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
11.850 Butyrate <isopropyl-, 2-methyl->0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
45 measurements in this report · 45 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Bay Laurel

    Analytical document archived for published batch GR-15488; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Bay Laurel

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.