Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Bay Laurel
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:46 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Historically, the leaves of the bay laurel were used to crown the victor. This essential oil derived from bay leaves used in cooking has a wonderfully spicy aroma. Laurel is an antibacterial oil, specifically recommended in a steam inhalation for tonsillitis or added to any cold and flu blend. It is said to be strongly anti-viral, as well. Some resources recommend its use in combatting or preventing any virus which attacks the respiratory system. Bay Laurel can be an interesting addition to hair care blends, said to be an excellent remedy for hair and scalp, stimulating hair growth and clearing dandruff. There are those who recommend it for treating acne, as well. Emotionally, it is both uplifting and grounding, helping to clear mental confusion and clarify thought processes. As such, it might be an effective addition to a study blend. Dr. Kurt Schnaubelt recommends it as a lymphatic stimulant and says it is the oil of choice for treating swollen glands. It is also recommended as an immune stimulant. I love to add it to blends using the more “medicinal smelling” oils (in my opinion … Tea Tree, Manuka, Saro, etc.) because its aroma makes them more palatable. I have used it to cook with, adding a couple of drops to a pot of gumbo when I was out of the required bay leaves. Yummy! I recommend it in any recipe calling for bay leaves … saves fishing them out, and gives a more vital flavor. My pagan friends say laurel will bring money… put a drop on a bingo card and you are guaranteed to win. WARNING: Avoid using when pregnant, and please be careful using in skin blends: it is both irritating and sensitizing, used unwisely. However it is very effective as a minor component of a blend. Avoid use of Bay Laurel if you are on anti-coagulant therapy (blood thinners). Robert Tisserand advises potentially carcinogenic based on methyleugenol content; essential oils high in 1,8 cineole can cause CNS and breathing problems in young children; skin sensitization (low risk); mucous membrane irritation (low risk). Maximum dermal use Tisserand 0.5%, IFRA 0.01% SHELF LIFE: Approximately 3 to 4 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. **For other possible oils to avoid, please see our Contraindications page. Certificate of Analysis: 2014 Batch No. GR-15291 Batch No. GR-15488 Batch No. MO-B516034 Batch No. MO-B516035 Batch No. MO-58888 Batch No. CR-59037 Batch No. HR-59308 (Current Batch) BLENDS WITH: Benzoin, Citrus Oils, Black Pepper, Cardamom, Cinnamon, Clove Bud, Coriander, Cypress, Eucalyptus, Frankincense, Geranium, Ginger, Juniper, Lavender, Peppermint, Rosemary, Ylangylang. One of the nicest bars of soap for a man that I’ve ever smelled was a simple blend of Bay Laurel and Atlas Cedarwood. YUMMY. (No I don’t know the proportions, I wasn’t the soapmaker.) Laurus nobilis, wildcrafted, steam-distilled leaves, from Croatia. Sometimes called “Laurel Leaf” Oil.
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 792c3443e64beb7a06b979f5a4abf4a8 | USD 20.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- 2014Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. GR-15291Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. GR-15488Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MO-B516034Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MO-B516035Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MO-58888Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. CR-59037Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. HR-59308 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
5 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, exact analysis date, batch. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20.851 1,8-Cineole | 42.75% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 42.475 Terpinyl acetate <beta> | 14.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 25.382 Linalool | 12.58% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 16.900 Sabinene | 4.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 45.880 Methyleugenol | 4.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.560 Limonene | 3.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 14.571 Pinene <alpha> | 2.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 17.247 Pinene <beta-> | 2.52% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 42.747 Eugenol | 2.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.228 Cymene <para-> | 1.78% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 22.491 Terpinene <gamma> | 1.48% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 31.116 Terpinen-4-ol | 1.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 32.113 Terpineol <alpha> | 1.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 42.573 Terpinyl acetate <alpha> | 0.88% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 17.837 Myrcene | 0.56% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 19.706 Terpinene <alpha-> | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 19.020 Phellandrene <alpha-> | 0.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 15.561 Camphene | 0.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 38.288 Bornyl acetate | 0.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 47.297 Caryophyllene <trans> | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 21.615 Ocimene <E-beta> | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 24.375 Terpinolene | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 23.329 Sabinene hydrate <cis> | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 34.057 Nerol | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 40.204 Ocimenyl acetate | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 32.295 Methyl chavicol | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 14.098 Thujene <alpha-> | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 38.765 2-Undecanone | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 35.790 Linalyl acetate | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 43.120 Neryl acetate | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 45.293 Elemene <beta-> | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 18.641 Isobutyl 2-methylbutyrate | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 24.675 2-Nonanone | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 40.859 Myrtenyl acetate | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 10.429 Hex-3(Z)-enol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 13.318 Isobutyl isobutyrate | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 19.170 3-Carene | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 30.534 2-Bornanol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 10.333 Isovalerate <ethyl-> | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 12.604 2-Heptanol | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 9.794 Butyrate <isopropyl-> | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 10.145 Butyrate <2-methyl-, ethyl-> | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 13.960 Tricyclene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 15.445 Fenchene <alpha> | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 11.850 Butyrate <isopropyl-, 2-methyl-> | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Bay Laurel
Analytical document archived for published batch GR-15488; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Bay Laurel
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.