Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Niaouli

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Niaouli is a strong antiseptic, antibacterial oil. It also has strong decongestant properties, which make it appropriate for treating head and chest colds. In addition, it helps clear the head mentally, as well, since it has a stimulating and uplifting effect. For a daytime respiratory blend, try mixing it with Peppermint, Eucalyptus, and either Pine or Fir. A really energizing blend when you are fighting a cold and want to stay in bed, but can’t. Some sources recommend it for fighting acne, boils, and other skin infections. I have also seen it recommended for treating cystitis. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. AU-MQC-040 Batch No. AU-MQC-044 Batch No. AU-MQC-049 Batch No. MA-58924 Batch No. MA-59156 Batch No. MG-59396 (Current Batch) Image courtesy of Steven Foster. Melaleuca quinquenervia, steam-distilled leaves, Madagascar – Strong decongestant properties – Mentally clears the head with stimulating and uplifting effects Powerful anti-bacterial

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site13bbef9531be7cf9f4aec2a544a23853USD 12.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Supplier report information is available
Documented

5 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, percentage basis. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Melaleuca quinquenervia
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
1,8-Cineole68.88%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-811.39%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-56.49%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PineneCAS 127-91-33.39%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Terpinyl acetateCAS 80-26-21.40%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymene1.19%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrcene1.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Caryophyllene1.00%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinen-4-ol0.75%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-40.56%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
ViridiflorolCAS 552-02-30.47%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-Nerolidol0.35%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinolene0.26%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LinaloolCAS 78-70-60.25%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Viridiflorene0.23%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-Terpineol0.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-20.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-50.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-90.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Humulene0.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
IsopulegolCAS 89-79-20.11%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CampheneCAS 79-92-50.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-SelineneCAS 17066-67-00.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Benzaldehyde Simple Phenolic0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Pseudolimonene0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-Ocimene0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-GurjuneneCAS 489-40-70.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Ledol0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-beta-Ocimene0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Citronellol0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-50.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
AromadendreneCAS 489-39-40.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-SelineneCAS 473-13-20.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Palustrol0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Ethyl 2-methylbutyrate0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-20.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Methyl benzoate Phenolic0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Fenchol0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-Terpinyl acetate0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-CadineneCAS 39029-41-90.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-10.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-60.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-PinocarveolCAS 1674-08-40.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-FencheneCAS 471-84-10.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SabineneCAS 3387-41-50.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymen-8-ol0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymenene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Rose oxide0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Camphene hydrateCAS 465-31-60.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
50 measurements in this report · 50 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Niaouli

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Niaouli

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.