Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Fennel, Sweet

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:35 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Sweet licorice aroma. Often recommended for massage where there is cellulite and for the digestive system, especially for indigestion or gas. Fennel essential oil is often recommended for PMS and for menstrual difficulties. I add just a drop to my PMS blend. Its distinctive scent is softened by blending with Rose Geranium and Clary Sage. I suspect its mildly diuretic action can help with fluid retention that often adds to the discomfort of PMS. Some sources recommend Fennel for detoxifying the body, that it is helpful for detoxifying from overindulgence in alcohol, nicotine, and other toxic substances. I think a blend of Fennel, Juniper, and Seaweed Essential Oils, blended into sea salts, would make a wonderful detoxifying bath. It was an ingredient in our Detox Synergy. Fennel is often recommended for breast firming massage and to promote milk production with new mothers, however, I think that the distinctive aroma could interfere with the bonding that needs to occur between the mother and newborn, and would prefer to see nursing mothers drink fennel seed tea. Emotionally, fennel can ease stress and nervous tension without having the mildly sedative effect that many of the relaxing essential oils bring. A blend of Sweet Fennel and Rosemary can both relieve stress and energize; the only other essential oil that I know of with that effect is Pink Grapefruit. WARNING: Fennel can be a skin irritant. Do not use it on young children. Do not use if pregnant. Do not use if suffering from epilepsy. Caution: it may affect diabetes. Robert Tisserand advises that: Drug interaction; reproductive hormone modulation, potentially carcinogenic, based on estragole content, may inhibit blood clotting, skin sensitization if oxidized. Contraindicated during pregnancy, breastfeeding, endometriosis, estrogen-depenedent cancers, children under age 5. Possible interactions with diabetes anticoagulant medications, major surgery, peptic ulcer, hemophilia, other bleeding disorders. Maximum dermal use: IFRA 0.2%, Tisserand 2.5% based on 4.8% estragole content. (Note, our current batch has only 3.13% estragole. I would still limit its use.) **For other possible oils to avoid, please see our essential oil Contraindications page. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: 2014 Batch No. HU-B416003 Batch No. HU-B416005 Batch No. HU-59002 Batch No. HU-59075 Batch No. HU-59317 Batch No. HU-59541 (Current Batch) BLENDS WELL WITH: Basil, Geranium, Lavender, Lemon, Rose, Rosemary, and Sandalwood, but personally my experience is that fennel will take over a blend unless used very sparingly indeed. Foeniculum vulgare var. dulce , organically grown, steam-distilled seeds, Hungary. • PMS and other menstrual difficulties • Detoxifying • Eases stress and nervous tension • Contraindicated during pregnancy, breastfeeding…

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site6b53902f0b6ee7490f269385561da733USD 26.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Supplier report information is available
Documented

4 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, analysis method, exact analysis date, origin, batch, percentage basis. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
HU-59541
Report botanical identity
Not reported
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Hungary
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
(E)-AnetholeCAS 104-46-166.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LimoneneCAS 138-86-311.34%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-810.75%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Methyl chavicolCAS 140-67-04.64%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
FenchoneCAS 1195-79-53.87%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
UK BP: 91 Unknown0.48%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoterpinolene0.44%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1,8-CineoleCAS 470-82-60.42%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Anisaldehyde Simple Phenolic0.42%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SabineneCAS 3387-41-50.41%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
MyrceneCAS 123-35-30.35%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-20.28%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PineneCAS 127-91-30.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-AnetholeCAS 25679-28-10.11%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Acetonylanisole0.11%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-CymeneCAS 99-87-60.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CampheneCAS 79-92-50.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
TricycleneCAS 508-32-70.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-40.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-50.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-CaryophylleneCAS 118-65-00.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-CaryophylleneCAS 87-44-50.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
22 measurements in this report · 22 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Fennel, Sweet

    Analytical document archived for published batch HU-59541; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Fennel, Sweet

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.