Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Rose Otto, Turkish
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:50 PM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
To my nose our Turkish Rose Otto is just a bit lighter aromatically than the deep Bulgarian Rose. Which is best for you is a matter of choice. The ultimate Rose Oil. Available pure and undiluted, or in a 5% Dilution in long-lasting Fractionated Coconut Oil, skin safe and ready to wear. The phrases “Rose Otto,” and “Rose Oil,” and “Rose Essential Oil” mean the exact same thing. A true essential oil hydro-distilled from the petals of Rosa damascena. The best quality Rose Otto is grown and distilled in Bulgaria and Turkey. The Rosa damascena oils produced in other countries simply do not measure up. Rose Oil Uses The ultimate woman’s oil, Rose Otto (rose oil) is calming, and supportive. In my experience nothing strengthens a woman’s spirit as well as true rose oil. Rose has no parallel in treating grief, hysteria, or depression. Rose oil is believed by many to help balance female hormones, regulate the menstrual cycle, and ease the discomforts of PMS and menopause. In Europe it is used to treat genito-urinary infections. Sexual difficulties also respond well to rose’s gentle support. It is helpful to all skin types. Please note that true, undiluted Rose Otto can become solid at a cool room temperature. If this happens to yours, you can roll the bottle around in your hand for a few minutes, or put it in some warm water, and it will liquefy. Blends With: All the different roses blend especially well with the citrus oils, Cedarwoods, Frankincense, Jasmine, Lemongrass, Mandarine, Patchouli, Sandalwood, and Vetiver. Rose and Sandalwood are one of my favorite perfume blends, any proportion works well. Sandalwood with a hint of rose is lovely for a man’s cologne; Rose with a touch of Sandalwood works beautifully for women. Either make a wonderfully romantic massage oil. If you are a rose lover, please see our Rose Hydrosol! To experience all of our roses, please see our Bouquet of Roses Sampler. GC/MS Batch No. TU-58907 Batch No. TU-59096 Batch No. TR-59302 (Current Batch) Rosa damascena, ethically farmed, hydro-distilled petals, Turkey.
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 0c2f78c4fae9561186eee94bcdb5ac9a | USD 95.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. TU-58907Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TU-59096Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TR-59302 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
3 reports connected; 3 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
3 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citronellol | 40.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| GeraniolCAS 106-24-1 | 15.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonadecane Alkane | 9.80% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NerolCAS 106-25-2 | 5.72% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Heneicosane Alkane | 4.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl eugenol | 2.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonadecene Alkene | 2.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| UK Rose Otto | 1.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 1.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Heptadecane Alkane | 1.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 1.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Eicosane Alkane | 0.98% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tricosane Alkane | 0.98% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 0.95% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Phenylethanol Simple Phenolic | 0.84% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z,E)-FarnesolCAS 3790-71-4 | 0.69% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 0.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-GuaieneCAS 3691-12-1 | 0.52% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 0.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 0.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranial | 0.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 29.20 Bulnesene<alpha-> 0.00 | 0.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neral | 0.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Pentacosane Alkane | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Pentadecane Alkane | 0.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-9 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Hexanol | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Rose oxide | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tetradecanol | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octadecane Alkane | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Aciphyllene | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Docosane Alkane | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Heptanal | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Isogeraniol | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neryl acetateCAS 141-12-8 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octadecanol | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-alpha-Farnesene | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexadecane Alkane | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z,Z)-Farnesol | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nerol oxide | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| PogostolCAS 21698-41-9 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonanal | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl geranate | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CopaeneCAS 18252-44-3 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Phenylethyl tiglate Phenolic | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Phenylethyl benzoate Phenolic | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Elemol | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Nerolidol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tetracosane Alkane | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-5 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-6 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-EudesmolCAS 1209-71-8 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Benzyl benzoate Phenolic | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Pentadecanol | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexadecanal | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexanal | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Hex-3-en-1-ol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Benzaldehyde Simple Phenolic | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-ol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,8-Cineole | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellyl formateCAS 105-85-1 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| UndecanalCAS 112-44-7 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-Farnesol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Hexadecanol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 47.09 Ethyl hexadecanoate 0.00 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octanal | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Phenylacetaldehyde | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octanol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Perillene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-PinocarveolCAS 1674-08-4 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-VerbenolCAS 1820-09-3 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DecanalCAS 112-31-2 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl formateCAS 105-86-2 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tridecane Alkane | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Phenylethyl isobutyrate Phenolic | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Farnesene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Muurola-3,5-diene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Dauca-5,8-diene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-GurjuneneCAS 22567-17-5 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Chamigrene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-0 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TridecanalCAS 10486-19-8 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Ethyl dodecanoate | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tetradecanal | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| T-MuurololCAS 19912-62-0 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-MuurololCAS 104245-48-9 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 36.18 Germacra-4(15),5,10(14)-trien-1-alpha-ol 0.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,Z)-Farnesal | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octadecene Alkene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 42.03 Phenyl ethyl octanoate 0.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 47.45 Hexadecyl acetate 0.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Rose Otto, Turkish
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Rose Otto, Turkish
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.