Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Agarwood (Oud, Aloewood)

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:47 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Distilled from trees over 20 years old sourced from sustainably cultivated fields, regulated closely by CITES official guidelines. Grown chemical free. A stunning Agarwood. VERY limited supply. In 2002 we brought in a tiny amount of this rarity. At the time, I wrote: “Deep, woody, earthy, stable and strong…if rocks had roots they would smell like this distillation of agarwood. Amazingly tenacious. Aphrodisiac, unforgettable. The aroma speaks to your spirit for hours. A smidgeon on a scent strip lingers for hours, and reverberates inside our spirit. I can’t BELIEVE I found this rarity!” Of this new specimen Christi wrote, “Finally, an Agarwood (Oud) oil that will put a smile on your face and tickle your fancy! First impression of our new Thai Agarwood, it makes my nose happy! From the tropical Agar tree, a gift from the Eastern Hemisphere, much sought after in oil or resin form. Marge finds it animalic, which is an attribute often associated with Agarwood. Multi-layered and slightly musky with an unexpected sweetness to its depth, the aroma is stunning, and must be experienced. Agarwood is a base note in perfumery, normally evoking a ‘thump’ in the stomach, for its earthiness. Our Thai specimen is not quite as earthy as one might expect, but personally, I prefer the musty, sweet, woodsiness of this new batch. The oil is thick and resinous, dark orange in color. Many high end perfumes contain Agarwood (Oud). Sometimes it is referred to as ‘Aloeswood’.” Available pure or diluted here in a 10% dilution in Organic Jojoba. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. TH-58560 Batch No. TH-58677 Batch No. TH-58837 Batch No. ID-58944 Batch No. TH-59289 Batch No. TH-59363 Batch No. TH-59410 (Current Batch) Aquilaria crassna, hydro-distilled from the wood of naturally farmed trees, Thailand CITES certified

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site3a8544f9e7077c5525a5dda2ff8ceb13USD 150.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

4 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 127.08%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Aquilaria crassna
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
ValerianolCAS 20489-45-66.43%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-EudesmolCAS 1209-71-83.31%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Cuminal2.59%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Hinesol1.68%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
38.78 Amorpha-4,9-diene<7,14-anhydro-> 0.001.44%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
29.20 Bulnesene<alpha-> 0.001.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Hexadecanoic acid Fatty Acid1.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-VetiveneneCAS 28908-26-10.96%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-60.92%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Costol0.59%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Vetispirene0.50%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Guaiene0.35%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
9-epi-(E)-Caryophyllene0.29%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-GuaieneCAS 3691-12-10.28%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
27.63 Aristolochene<4,5-di-epi-> 0.000.28%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
epi-alpha-BisabololCAS 78148-59-10.28%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Oleic Acid Fatty Acid0.24%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
42.05 Eremophilone<8-hydroxy-> 0.000.19%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Kessane0.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
ElemolCAS 639-99-60.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Benzaldehyde Simple Phenolic0.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Panasinsen0.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
BicyclogermacreneCAS 24703-35-30.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 18252-46-50.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
ValenceneCAS 4630-07-30.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Acetophenone Simple Phenolic0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-40.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
StyreneCAS 100-42-50.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Furfural0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-MenthatrieneCAS 18368-95-10.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
48.16 Geranyl linalool<E,E->0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Salicylaldehyde Simple Phenolic0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
9.92 Benzene methanol<alpha-methyl-> 0.000.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-IsocitralCAS 72203-98-60.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1-Nonanol Fatty0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PatchouleneCAS 514-51-20.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LongifoleneCAS 475-20-70.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
UK AgarwoodNot quantifiedNo comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
82 measurements in this report · 38 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Agarwood (Oud, Aloewood)

    Analytical document archived for published batch TH-59289; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Agarwood (Oud, Aloewood)

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.