Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Lemon Myrtle
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:07 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
This tree is plantation grown on an organically certified farm, and produces the purest natural form of citral in the world. A sweet lemon scent, used in perfumery, aromatherapy, and in cooking. An extremely potent antibacterial and germicide, Lemon Scented Myrtle Oil is a much more effective germ killer than the more familiar Tea Tree. Anecdotal evidence shows a much lower than expected number of coughs, colds and sinus problems in households that regularly diffuse the oil in an aromalamp. It makes a lovely winter oil, with its combination of a cheerful lemon scent and its proven germicidal activity. Anecdotal evidence from a friend who has been testing this oil in Australia: Over the last 8 months, three different homes have been using Lemon Myrtle oil in common oil burners—two to three drops only—with the following results: Definite reduction in colds and flu symptoms. Reduction in sinus problems. One has suffered for years (he’s also wheel-chair-bound due to a football accident when much younger), and is now a confirmed “addict” to Bc oil. Happier, sweeter smelling houses—“What is that beautiful smell” type reactions. Reduction in moths and silverfish and other creepy crawlies in clothes cupboards. (The whole leaf can be used in a similar way—a couple in each drawer—seems to be particularly efficient in the bathroom drawers.) None of these people are related to me, so have not had to bribe them them to say “good things” about Bc!! Lemon Myrtle Essential Oil is wonderful for oily skin and acne. The distiller recommends a drop dabbed neat on zits, however, the oil has not gone through extensive testing so we do not know if it is a potential sensitizer. It is a skin irritant, so I would not advise using it undiluted. I would dip a cotton ball in distilled water and add one drop of the Lemon Myrtle, and then touch THAT to the zit. Many oils are classed as “lemon” oils because of their aroma. Lemon oil itself is cold-pressed from lemon peel and is actually less “lemony” than many other oils because it contains only 3–10% of citral, the best known of the lemon scent components. Lemon myrtle, by contrast, contains 95% citral. I do not enjoy most “lemon-scented” oils. I am not a fan of lemongrass for example because it seems to lack the clarity of true lemon. This Lemon Myrtle is exquisite; as clear and clean as any lemon I have experienced. Anecdotal evidence from Australian aromatherapists, who have tested Lemon Myrtle indicate that it can be effective for relieving chest congestion whether diffused or in a massage blend. It also seems useful for relaxation, uplifting emotions, and soothing sleep. Lemon Myrtle’s extraordinarily high level of citral should make it a powerful antibacterial, antiseptic, and antifungal agent. I like to add a few drops to the diffuser just to generally clear the air in our house. The distiller states that Lemon Myrtle Essential Oil has many culinary uses. The pure essential oil is best suited to: Vinaigrettes mayonnaise
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 43d65016393833fa9c3b790981c5e62e | USD 20.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. AU-BC-069Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-BC-080Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-59035Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-59283 (Current 15 ml Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-59523Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
4 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, percentage basis, botanical name. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 113.10%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geranial | 48.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neral | 37.98% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Isocitral | 1.99% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 1.75% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 1.55% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| GeraniolCAS 106-24-1 | 1.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one | 1.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.80% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-isocitral | 0.73% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CitronellalCAS 106-23-0 | 0.59% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 0.56% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BorneolCAS 507-70-0 | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellol | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| exo-Isocitral | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-9 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpinyl acetateCAS 80-26-2 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NerolCAS 106-25-2 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Farnesene | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BicyclogermacreneCAS 24703-35-3 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-6 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-4 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornyl acetateCAS 76-49-3 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Carveol | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-ElemeneCAS 20307-84-0 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl salicylate Phenolic | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| AromadendreneCAS 489-39-4 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Viridiflorene | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| neo-IsopulegolCAS 7786-67-6 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neric acid Monoterpene Acid | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 9-epi-(E)-Caryophyllene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-SelineneCAS 17066-67-0 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-ol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Pseudolimonene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| o-Cymene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl formateCAS 105-86-2 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-4 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-SelineneCAS 515-17-3 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-Bisabolene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-alpha-Farnesene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SpathulenolCAS 6750-60-3 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Lemon Myrtle
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Lemon Myrtle
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.