Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Orange, Bitter

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Sometimes I learn about what an oil can do, know it is useful, so we import it. Sometimes I fall in love, and then research what it can do. Years ago I sampled a distilled Bitter Orange oil. Aromatically it was just that, bitter. Perhaps they had gotten some of the white pith in the oil, I don’t know, but it was bitter, and unpleasant. Plus, cold pressed Bitter Orange oil is a severe photosensitizer, so it is unsafe for topical use. Why should we offer this? So we never have. A few months ago I met an Egyptian author and researcher who had just started importing some of the oils his company distills. I sampled, and I fell in love! This organically grown, steam distilled Bitter Orange oil, Citrus aurantium var. amara, is the fruit of the same tree that gives us my beloved Neroli and Petitgrain Bigarade oils. Who knew that I would love this citrus rind oil just as much? Unlike our other, cold pressed orange oils, which are cheery and vivid and very “in your face,”— this Bitter Orange Oil is subtle, and almost floral. I swear I can sense the orange blossoms that preceded it… it smells more like a gentle floral than a citrus oil; very subtle, very complex. I was in love. Today at the very end of November, it arrived in house. I was worried. What if the import didn’t match my memory? What if I didn’t love it? I asked Jim for a scent strip and knew we were in luck…Jim was smiling when he brought the scent strip up for me to sample; so I knew we had something special! Subtle, aromatically seeming to blend both citrus and floral notes, this oil could make a single note perfume alone, although I think it would be very fleeting. Physically, there is research indicating that the oil of the Bitter Orange rind is shown to be an effective antibacterial against gram positive bacteria, including staph, but not against gram negative bacteria. It is, however found to be a powerful topical anti-fungal. I have seen research showing it is effective against candida and athlete’s foot, among other fungal infections. However emotional use is where this lovely Bitter Orange Oil really shines. I have found a long list of research studies showing its effectiveness as an anxiolytic, an anti-anxiety agent. There are published research studies showing its effectiveness for many types/situations inducing anxiety, among them presurgical, during labor, and even during withdrawals from crack addiction. If you suffer from anxiety, and are already using Neroli and Petitgrain Bigarade oils to help deal with it, the oil of their fruit, the Bitter Orange, would be a valuable addition to your aromatic arsenal. Jim and I have discussed replacing the Sweet Orange currently in our Reunite Synergy with this lovely oil. SAFETY: Unlike its cold-pressed counterpart, the distilled Bitter Orange oil is NOT a photosensitizer, but is sun safe. Note: Always dilute in a carrier oil at appropriate dilutions for use on skin. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site3f8c4329489e6c2c965ecd25a6d09663USD 17.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

3 reports connected; 3 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

3 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 196.10%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Not reported
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Jul 5, 12:00 AM UTC
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
LimoneneCAS 138-86-380.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LinaloolCAS 78-70-64.42%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Limonene oxide2.26%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Limonene oxideCAS 4959-35-72.26%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Carveol1.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CarvoneCAS 99-49-00.85%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrcene0.80%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-para-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol0.77%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Carveol0.76%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-80.64%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Linalyl acetateCAS 115-95-70.43%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-30.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Carvyl acetate0.28%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PineneCAS 127-91-30.27%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Citrusal Coumarin0.27%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Perillyl alcohol0.21%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CamphorCAS 76-22-20.20%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SabineneCAS 3387-41-50.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Osthole Coumarin0.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geranial0.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-60.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-40.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-para-Mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Perilla aldehydeCAS 2111-75-30.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
DecanalCAS 112-31-20.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Octyl acetateCAS 112-14-10.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-Nerolidol0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Auraptene Coumarin0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymene0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
6,7-Epoxymyrcene0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Neral0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-para-Mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Octanal0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Nonacosane Alkane0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Pentacosane Alkane0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Heptacosane Alkane0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
36 measurements in this report · 36 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Orange, Bitter

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Orange, Bitter

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.