Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Bergamot
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:46 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Marge says: “I have never understood the attraction to Bergamot. In close to 30 years, I have never found a specimen I was excited about. And then we received a sample of this cold-pressed Italian oil from the producer. And it was love at first sight…or sniff, or whatever. NOW I understand the attraction of Bergamot! I hope you will enjoy this amazing specimen as much as I do.” Lovely green light citrus/floral note, fruity and warm, much used by perfumers as a top note. Encouraging, balancing to the spirit. Combats fatigue due to stress, tension and anxiety. Is reputed to strengthen the immune system. The flavoring in Earl Grey tea. Some authorities recommend it as a treatment for herpes, shingles, eczema, and psoriasis, although much care must be used when applying it to the skin, due to the risk of photosensitivity. Mixes well with other Citrus Oils, Geranium, Ylangylang as well as other florals, such as Rose or Neroli. Some sources advise mixing with Lavender, but I’m not pleased with the result. WARNING: Never apply Bergamot to skin that will be exposed to the sun. Maximum dermal use to avoid phototoxicity is 0.4%. **For other possible oils to avoid, please see our Contraindications page. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. IT-B120027 Test Analysis courtesy of Essential Oil Awareness, an essential oil consumer testing group. Batch No. IT-B120030 Batch No. IT-B120031 Batch No. IT-B120033 Batch No. IT-59083 Batch No. IT-59179 Batch No. IT-59278 Batch No. IT-59358 Batch No, IT-59496 (Current Batch) BLENDS WITH: It’s hard to think of an oil that doesn’t blend well with Bergamot, but, for a short list: Black Pepper, Clary Sage, Cypress, Frankincense, Geranium, Helichrysum, Jasmine, Lavenders, Nutmeg, Rosemary, Sandalwood, Vetiver, Ylangylang. Citrus bergamia, organically produced, cold-pressed rind, Italy. • Citrus/floral • Combats fatigue • Fruity and warm • Immune support • Stress reliever • Photosensitizer
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 388cee272fd2ab9df4a2a18ce689bfd6 | USD 13.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. IT-B120027Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Test AnalysisBatch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IT-B120030Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IT-B120031Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IT-B120033Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IT-59083Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IT-59179Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IT-59278Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IT-59358Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No, IT-59496 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
5 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 35.88% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalyl acetateCAS 115-95-7 | 34.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 10.78% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 6.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 3.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MyrceneCAS 123-35-3 | 1.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 0.84% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.77% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neryl acetateCAS 141-12-8 | 0.65% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 0.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-4 | 0.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CaryophylleneCAS 87-44-5 | 0.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-4 | 0.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| GeranialCAS 141-27-5 | 0.35% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3779-61-1 | 0.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TerpinoleneCAS 586-62-9 | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-CymeneCAS 99-87-6 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NeralCAS 106-26-3 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octyl acetateCAS 112-14-1 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpinyl acetateCAS 80-26-2 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-olCAS 562-74-3 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| iso-Bergaptene Coumarin | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CarvoneCAS 99-49-0 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3338-55-4 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DecanalCAS 112-31-2 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NerolCAS 106-25-2 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-HumuleneCAS 6753-98-6 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-FarneseneCAS 18794-84-8 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NootkatoneCAS 4674-50-4 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-5 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonanal | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-Bisabolene | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-oneCAS 110-93-0 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| OctanalCAS 124-13-0 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Terpineol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonyl acetate | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalyl propionate | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellyl acetateCAS 150-84-5 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BicyclogermacreneCAS 24703-35-3 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonacosane Alkane | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexyl acetate | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CitronellalCAS 106-23-0 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CitronellolCAS 106-22-9 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Pentacosane Alkane | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Heptacosane Alkane | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Bergamot
Analytical document archived for published batch IT-59358; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Bergamot
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.