Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Grapefruit, Red
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:34 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
This may be the sweetest citrus oil I have ever experienced, much sweeter than my beloved Pink Grapefruit. Aromatically it reminds me of a Jolly Rancher candy! I would expect this variation to be equally useful in treating oil skin or hair, but I am reminded the all cold pressed grapefruit oils are photosensitizers so need caution if used in a leave on product. It might be delightful in a shampoo for oily hair, however. Recent research has also shown that inhaling Grapefruit Essential Oil may help reduce the craving for sweets. In all honesty, I am unable to determine whether the Grapefruit oil used in that research study was white, pink or red. However the sweetness of this oil makes me think that in an inhaler or aromastick it might help stave off the munchies. This sweet oil, in a diffuser, should deligh small children, and is child safe as long as you keep the sun safety in mind. Safety: Robert Tisserand advises: phototoxicity (low risk), avoid use before exposing to sunlight or tanning bed, maximum dermal use 4%. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certficiate of Analysis: Batch No. IS-162765 Batch No: IS-58717 Batch No. ME-59078 Citrus paradisii Macf., organically produced, cold-pressed rind, Mexico • Reduce Food Cravings • Oily hair and skin in low dilution
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | d152c78d089bbfd18ab1f28ec6c450e9 | USD 0.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. IS-162765Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- IS-58717Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ME-59078Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
2 reports connected; 2 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
2 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 195.21%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 94.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Limonene 1029.50 | 94.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MyrceneCAS 123-35-3 | 1.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene 989.20 | 1.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 0.54% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinene 936.10 | 0.54% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sabinene 973.00 | 0.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene 1427.14 | 0.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nootkatone 1807.00 | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Decanal 1206.57 | 0.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octanal 998.00 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Copaene 1379.00 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Cubebene 1390.50 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Cadinene 1524.14 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene 1047.70 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalool 1099.00 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene D 1484.71 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellal 1154.50 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellol 1229.25 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Pinene 974.00 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranial 1272.00 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpineol 1191.71 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetate 1379.20 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neral 1246.57 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Grapefruit, Red
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Grapefruit, Red
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.