Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Cistus, Traditional
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:35 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
This “Traditional Cistus” is the most potently aromatic specimen I have experienced in over a decade. If you love deep and resinous scents you simply must try this! Cistus is a wonderful addition to a lymph drainage massage blend, and, in a warm compress, is said to be an effective treatment for swollen lymph glands. For abdominal pains caused by cold, cystitis, or painful menses, a sitz bath with a blend of Cistus and Sweet Marjoram may provide relief. Skin care: blend with German Chamomile CO2 to treat chronic slow-healing skin disorders like psoriasis, eczema, infected and inflamed skin conditions of all sorts. Rich, warm and spicy in aroma, Cistus has been used emotionally to warm what is frozen, a wonderful oil for those who have been traumatized or suffer from a dramatic loss. Cistus is considered one of the ancient spiritual oils with a history of being used in incense as an aid to meditation and centering. Many authorities believe that Cistus is the “Rose of Sharon” mentioned in the bible. One knowledgeable friend recommends it as an aid in astral projection; I believe she blends it with Spikenard, to ground her body, and applies a drop of the blend to the third eye. We also offer Labdanum Absolute, which is basically, solvent-extracted Cistus. If you are a fan of Cistus, it’s worth your while to take a look at the Labdanum. See also our Cistus Hydrosol —great for mature skin! Certificate of Analysis: Jun 2104 Batch No. SP-17090 Batch No. SP-20408 Batch No. SP-0018205 Batch No. SP-23542 Batch No. SP-59054 Batch No. ES-59311 Batch No. ES-59478 (Current Batch) BLENDS WITH: Bergamot, Chamomile, Clary Sage, Cypress, Helichrysum, Juniper, Lavender, Orange, Patchouli, Pine, Sandalwood, Vetiver. Cistus ladanifer, wildcrafted, steam-distilled by the traditional “open fire” method, Spain. The most aromatically intense Cistus I’ve experienced in over a decade. Distilled from the resinous leaves •Deep, resinous, rich, warm, spicy •Lymph massage, Swollen glands •Chronic Skin conditions, psoriasis •Meditation, Centering, Prayer
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | bbbf86836bc31458521c3d1e219b1774 | USD 15.50 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Jun 2104Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SP-17090Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SP-20408Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SP-0018205Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SP-23542Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SP-59054Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ES-59311Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ES-59478 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
8 reports connected; 8 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
8 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, origin, analysis method, exact analysis date, extraction method, batch, percentage basis. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 253.11%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 132.33%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 34.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| ViridifloreneCAS 21747-46-6 | 6.82% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| ViridiflorolCAS 552-02-3 | 5.48% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornyl acetateCAS 76-49-3 | 4.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-CymeneCAS 99-87-6 | 3.42% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 3.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-PinocarveolCAS 1674-08-4 | 3.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 2.97% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Ledol | 2.64% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-CymeneneCAS 1195-32-0 | 2.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 1.71% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 1.50% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-9 | 1.49% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-olCAS 562-74-3 | 1.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BorneolCAS 507-70-0 | 1.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 1.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MyrtenalCAS 564-94-3 | 1.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2,2,6-trimethylCyclohexanoneCAS 2408-37-9 | 1.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| PinocamphoneCAS 547-60-4 | 0.94% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Cyclosativene | 0.94% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-GuaieneCAS 3691-12-1 | 0.83% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 0.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| PinocarvoneCAS 30460-92-5 | 0.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 0.59% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Campholenal | 0.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Thuja-2,4(10)-diene | 0.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CamphorCAS 76-22-2 | 0.52% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TricycleneCAS 508-32-7 | 0.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Palustrol | 0.42% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MyrceneCAS 123-35-3 | 0.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CalacoreneCAS 21391-99-1 | 0.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-MuurololCAS 104245-48-9 | 0.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 3,5,5-trimethyl-Cyclohexane | 0.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.30% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-0 | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Alloocimene | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,3,8-para-MenthatrieneCAS 18368-95-1 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SpathulenolCAS 6750-60-3 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Cadina-1(6),4-dieneCAS 20085-11-4 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-VerbenolCAS 1820-09-3 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-6 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CadaleneCAS 483-78-3 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Verbenyl acetate | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| T-CadinolCAS 5937-11-1 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornyl formate | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sativene | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-epi-CubenolCAS 19912-67-5 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrtenyl acetateCAS 1079-01-2 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CaryophylleneCAS 87-44-5 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Methylcycloheptanol | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Mentha-3,8-diene | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Carveol | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CarvoneCAS 99-49-0 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Isopulegyl acetate | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| VerbenoneCAS 18309-32-5 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3338-55-4 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| UK Cistus | Not quantified | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Cistus, Traditional
Analytical document archived for published batch SP-0018205; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Cistus, Traditional
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.