Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Cedarwood, Himalayan
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:46 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
I hope by now everyone knows how I love our traditional Atlas Cedarwood Oil. This new Indian Cedar is, if anything, aromatically sweeter. A softer note, almost a touch of floral or fruit, yet with the spiritual strength and support of all true Cedarwood. It is sweetly resinous, lovely alone in the aroma lamp or in blends where you want a soft wood note. Which of our Cedarwoods oils is right for you? Request a sample of both when you check out and we’ll be glad to include them with your order. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 3 to 4 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. (My estimate would be longer, but this is the official guideline.) Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. IN-837295 Batch No. IN-837295 v2 Batch No. IN-58645 Batch No. IN-58752 Batch No. IN-58963 Batch No. IN-59148 Batch No. IN-59367 (Current Batch) Cedrus deodara, wildcrafted, steam-distilled wood, India •Spiritual and Emotional Support •Skincare •Insecticide
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 23c79f224e8f194df611666bff56ba2c | USD 11.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. IN-837295Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-837295 v2Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-58645Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-58752Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-58963Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-59148Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-59367 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
5 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 153.35%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 158.40%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| beta-HimachaleneCAS 1461-03-6 | 33.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Himachalene 1497.75 | 33.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-HimachaleneCAS 3853-83-6 | 12.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Himachalene 1448.40 | 12.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-HimachaleneCAS 53111-25-4 | 8.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Himachalene 1476.50 | 8.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-gamma-Atlantone | 3.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-gamma-Atlantone | 3.59% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-alpha-Atlantone | 2.99% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Cuprenene | 2.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Cuprenene 1535.50 | 2.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Allohimachalol | 2.00% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| HimachalolCAS 1891-45-8 | 1.86% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Deodarone analog? | 1.62% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Dictamnol | 1.59% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Limona ketone 1134.50 Simple Phenolic | 1.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Himachala-2,4-diene 1476.80 | 1.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| ar-Dihydroturmerone 1591.00 | 1.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Calamenene 1529.50 | 0.75% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Dehydro-ar-himachalene 1529.75 | 0.67% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Thujopsadiene 1465.10 | 0.61% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Himachalene oxide 1578.00 | 0.58% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Himachalene oxide 1595.95 | 0.56% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Dehydro-ar-himachalene 1516.00 | 0.55% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Longifolene 1403.83 | 0.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Longiborneol 1586.50 | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Curcumene 1476.00 | 0.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-Bisabolene 1502.00 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Cuparene 1508.50 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-Bergamotene 1435.00 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sibirene 1401.20 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Cadinene 1524.14 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Methylacetophenone 1186.50 Simple Phenolic | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sativene 1395.00 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Calacorene 1537.14 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Longipinene 1357.90 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Ylangene 1371.33 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpineol 1191.71 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Copaene 1379.00 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Mesityl oxide 787.00 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymenene 1092.43 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Cedrene 1410.75 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Vestitenone 1457.50 Terpenic | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Nerolidol 1567.00 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinene 936.10 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Limonene 1029.50 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| UK Cedarwood | Not quantified | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Cedarwood, Himalayan
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Cedarwood, Himalayan
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.