Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Tagetes (Marigold)
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:49 PM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Flowers of the common French or African marigold are the source of this oil. (Don’t confuse it with Calendula, another marigold oil with very different properties!) English aromatherapist and educator Shirley Price says it is effective against fungal infections of the foot and against candida (and that it deters houseflies!). Vintage aromatherapist Valerie Worwood recommends it for treating corns, calluses, and other disorders of the foot. It should not be used in pregnancy or with small children. Benefits: Treat constipation, indigestion, and food poisoning Help wounds, skin infections like Staph, and boils to heal Treat athlete’s foot and other fungal infections Soothe calluses, corns, and bunions Relief from cough due to respiratory illness Stop insect bites from itching and burning Eradicate lice and bed bugs Repel mosquitoes and houseflies Also used as an effective pesticide spray for crops. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. GC/MS Analysis: Batch No. MA-14906 Batch No. IN-58591 Batch No. IN-59151 Batch No. IN-59495 (Current batch, Final Analysis in process) Tagetes minuta, wildcrafted, steam-distilled flowers, India effective against fungal infections corns, calluses and other disorders of the foot anti-parasitic
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 713a725e2b1ee5a9f292eec20b481f2b | USD 12.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. MA-14906Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-58591Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-59151Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
3 reports connected; 3 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
3 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, exact analysis date, botanical name, batch. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 205.92%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20.960 Ocimene <Z-beta> | 36.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 22.024 Dihydrotagetone | 17.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 29.001 Tagetone <cis> | 12.66% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 35.085 Tagetenone <trans> | 11.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.541 Limonene | 5.66% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 34.539 Tagetenone <cis> | 4.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 28.513 Tagetone <trans> | 1.71% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 27.308 Ocimene <allo> | 1.61% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 52.035 Bicyclogermacrene | 1.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 47.296 Caryophyllene <trans> | 1.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 16.890 Sabinene | 0.69% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 21.624 3-Carene | 0.61% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 49.560 Humulene <alpha> | 0.61% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 32.870 Pulespenone | 0.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 24.375 Terpinolene | 0.52% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 19.016 Phellandrene <alpha> | 0.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 51.143 Muurola-4(14),5-diene <trans> | 0.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 37.193 Piperitenone <iso> | 0.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 23.507 Pinene oxide <alpha> | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 44.879 Modheph-2-ene | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 56.894 Spathulenol | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 25.310 Linalool | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 10.143 Butyrate <2-methyl-, ethyl-> | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 36.063 Carvacrol | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 14.567 Pinene <alpha> | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 17.845 Myrcene | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.220 Cymene <para-> | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 15.551 Camphene | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 57.371 Caryophyllene oxide | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 41.502 Elemene <delta> | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 17.240 Pinene <beta-> | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 18.744 Octanal | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Tagetes (Marigold)
Analytical document archived for published batch MA-14906; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Tagetes (Marigold)
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.