Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Rosemary Cineole
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:50 PM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Wonderfully fresh and stimulating, Rosemary Oil is known for its ability to wake up the body and spirit. In a massage oil, it can stimulate circulation and is often used in blends for cellulite and edema. In cosmetics and soaps, it is believed to combat acne, dandruff, and excessively oily skin. A drop added to shampoo makes dark hair glow, and may stimulate hair growth. I’d not use Rosemary Essential Oil in the evening; it is far too stimulating and can ruin sleep. Also, avoid using if pregnant, if you have high blood pressure, or if you have a diagnosed seizure disorder. Rosemary Cineole is said to be useful in treating respiratory conditions, especially those stemming from nervous or emotional causes, such as many forms of asthma, so this is another potential use for it. 2017 has not been a good year for the oils produced around the Mediterranean. We have received several samples of Rosemary CT Cineole from various trusted sources and rejected them all out of hand. Most smelled like they belonged in a cat’s litter box. Finally, we received this fresh, clear specimen, obviously high in cineole, reminiscent of a really clean Eucalyptus specimen. We are delighted to make it available to you. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. GC/MS Analysis: Batch No. TU-48477 Batch No. MO-14175 Batch No. TU-20226 Batch No. TN-58938 Batch No. TN-59056 Batch No. TN-59269 Batch No. TN-59378 Batch No. TN-59487 (Current Batch) Rosmarinus officinalis var Cineole, organically produced in Tunisia, steam distilled from flowering tops. – stimulates circulation, useful for cellulite and edema – combats acne, dandruff and excessively oily skin – respiratory conditions from nervous or emotional causes
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 5e29fe038ed91652db10909c2e274aab | USD 18.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. TU-48477Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MO-14175Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TU-20226Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TN-58938Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TN-59056Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TN-59269Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TN-59378Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TN-59487 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
7 reports connected; 7 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
7 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 194.82%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,8-Cineole 1031.80 | 48.49% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Camphor 1147.55 | 12.69% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinene 936.10 | 10.85% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sabinene 973.00 | 6.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene 1427.14 | 3.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Borneol 1168.71 | 3.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Camphene 950.30 | 3.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpineol 1191.71 | 1.76% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Pinene 974.00 | 1.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornyl acetate 1288.29 | 0.97% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene 1024.30 | 0.79% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Terpinene 1054.00 | 0.79% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalool 1099.00 | 0.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol 1180.57 | 0.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene 1092.10 | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpinene 1014.00 | 0.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-3-Carene 1008.00 | 0.35% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Thujene 927.80 | 0.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene 1461.43 | 0.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Muurolene 1500.25 | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Cubebene 1390.50 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Phellandrene 1002.00 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Muurolene 1478.86 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octen-3-ol 980.00 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxide 1594.86 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tricyclene 923.00 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene 1037.80 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Sabinene hydrate 1072.00 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Ylangene 1371.33 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 3-Octanone 981.00 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene 1047.70 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Cubebene 1355.71 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Pinocarveol 1143.75 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Rosemary Cineole
Analytical document archived for published batch ……….. TN-58938 Type:…………….; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Rosemary Cineole
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.