Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Rosemary Cineole

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:50 PM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Wonderfully fresh and stimulating, Rosemary Oil is known for its ability to wake up the body and spirit. In a massage oil, it can stimulate circulation and is often used in blends for cellulite and edema. In cosmetics and soaps, it is believed to combat acne, dandruff, and excessively oily skin. A drop added to shampoo makes dark hair glow, and may stimulate hair growth. I’d not use Rosemary Essential Oil in the evening; it is far too stimulating and can ruin sleep. Also, avoid using if pregnant, if you have high blood pressure, or if you have a diagnosed seizure disorder. Rosemary Cineole is said to be useful in treating respiratory conditions, especially those stemming from nervous or emotional causes, such as many forms of asthma, so this is another potential use for it. 2017 has not been a good year for the oils produced around the Mediterranean. We have received several samples of Rosemary CT Cineole from various trusted sources and rejected them all out of hand. Most smelled like they belonged in a cat’s litter box. Finally, we received this fresh, clear specimen, obviously high in cineole, reminiscent of a really clean Eucalyptus specimen. We are delighted to make it available to you. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. GC/MS Analysis: Batch No. TU-48477 Batch No. MO-14175 Batch No. TU-20226 Batch No. TN-58938 Batch No. TN-59056 Batch No. TN-59269 Batch No. TN-59378 Batch No. TN-59487 (Current Batch) Rosmarinus officinalis var Cineole, organically produced in Tunisia, steam distilled from flowering tops. – stimulates circulation, useful for cellulite and edema – combats acne, dandruff and excessively oily skin – respiratory conditions from nervous or emotional causes

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site5e29fe038ed91652db10909c2e274aabUSD 18.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

7 reports connected; 7 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

7 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 194.82%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
……….. TN-58938 Type:…………….
Report botanical identity
Rosmarinus officinalis L. ct cineole
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Jun 26, 12:00 AM UTC
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
1,8-Cineole 1031.8048.49%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Camphor 1147.5512.69%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Pinene 936.1010.85%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Sabinene 973.006.53%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Caryophyllene 1427.143.57%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Borneol 1168.713.53%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Camphene 950.303.40%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Terpineol 1191.711.76%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Pinene 974.001.19%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Bornyl acetate 1288.290.97%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymene 1024.300.79%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-Terpinene 1054.000.79%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Linalool 1099.000.68%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinen-4-ol 1180.570.68%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinolene 1092.100.46%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Terpinene 1014.000.40%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-3-Carene 1008.000.35%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Thujene 927.800.33%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Humulene 1461.430.32%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Muurolene 1500.250.22%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Cubebene 1390.500.21%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Phellandrene 1002.000.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-Muurolene 1478.860.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1-Octen-3-ol 980.000.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Caryophyllene oxide 1594.860.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Tricyclene 923.000.11%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-beta-Ocimene 1037.800.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Sabinene hydrate 1072.000.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Ylangene 1371.330.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
3-Octanone 981.000.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-Ocimene 1047.700.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Cubebene 1355.710.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Pinocarveol 1143.750.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
33 measurements in this report · 33 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Rosemary Cineole

    Analytical document archived for published batch ……….. TN-58938 Type:…………….; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Rosemary Cineole

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.