Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Juniper Berry
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:07 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
At one time it may have been possible to acquire true “berry only” juniper oil, but my mentors (and my French and Canadian distillers) say that NO ONE is currently distilling a true, berry only, juniper oil. That the phrase “juniper berry oil” properly refers to juniper that includes the berries, not just the spiny branches. Juniper Berry contributes fresh balsamic notes to fragrances, used as a modifier for woody notes. Physical effects of Juniper Essential Oil Physically, Juniper Berry Oil is a diuretic and is often included in anti-cellulite and detoxifying blends. It is an essential component of any detoxifying blend, said by many to help with recovery from too much rich food or drink. Rosemary Caddy recommends Juniper Oil for treating gout, since, she says, it expels uric acid from the body. (Perhaps blended in St. John’s Wort Oil for its anti-inflammatory effect?) Juniper is antimicrobial for a wide range of bacteria (airborne, staph, strep, etc.) and can be used for respiratory complaints (inhalation). Juniper Oil is said to help recover from hangovers. It may be helpful with arthritis and rheumatism. Skin Care Uses of Juniper Oil In skin care it is said to aid in balancing oily skin and hair (thinking it would make a lovely blend with Geranium, perhaps a man’s blend?). A facial steam with juniper oil is a wonderful aid to balancing oily skin or to soften blackheads. Energetic Uses of Juniper Essential Oil Energetically, Juniper is said to clean the atmosphere of a room, clearing negativity from rooms or from people. (Similar to the cleansing effects of white sage.) There are those who recommend its use meditation for centering and drawing loving energy. Blending with Juniper Oil Detox Scrub: to 1/2 cup of sea salt, add enough carrier oil of your choice ( Jojoba works well for all skin types) to blend to a “wet sand” consistency. Blend 4 drops Lemon essential oil, 4 drops Juniper essential oil, and 2 drops Fennel essential oil. Stir essential oil blend into scrub base. After showering, while still standing in the shower, scrub the body with this gently detoxifying scrub, paying special attentions to areas of cellulite. Rinse well and dry. Detox Bath: Blend one cup Dead Sea Salts with the same essential oil blend mentioned above. Stir into warm bath, soak as long as you have patience for. Energizer: Combine equal parts of Peppermint, Juniper, and Rosemary Cineole essential oils. Either use in aromalamp or diffuser, or, for an energizing shower, put four or five drops of the blend on the shower floor. The steam will diffuse the aromatics. WARNINGS:Robert Tisserand advises that Commission E Monographs indicates that it may cause kidney damage or irritation. Robert found no evidence to support this, nor the pregnancy/fetal dangers. Regulatory guidelines still say that it may cause damage to kidneys. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller,
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 35e17780cccc08f076a8cdd7ae05bb8a | USD 17.50 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- November 2013Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- October 2014, CA-14J09-A4Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. FR-B-JUCOFRA02PBatch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. CA-58537Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. CA-58588Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. BU-58674Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. BU-59121Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MK-59355Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. HU-59470 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
4 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 35.62% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MyrceneCAS 123-35-3 | 11.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 8.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 6.63% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-CymeneCAS 99-87-6 | 6.59% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 4.92% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CaryophylleneCAS 87-44-5 | 4.71% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-HumuleneCAS 6753-98-6 | 4.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-olCAS 562-74-3 | 3.89% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TerpinoleneCAS 586-62-9 | 2.82% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 2.79% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 2.49% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Pseudolimonene | 0.83% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 7.31 Mentha-2,8-diene<cis-meta-> 0.00 | 0.62% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 0.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Elemene | 0.30% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-9 | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Isolimonene | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-9 | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene D-4-ol | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-6 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hashishene | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TricycleneCAS 508-32-7 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 31.65 Undecalactone<gamma-> 0.00 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-3-CareneCAS 13466-78-9 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornyl acetateCAS 76-49-3 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LongifoleneCAS 475-20-7 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3338-55-4 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| allo-Aromadendrene epoxide | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 3-p-Menthene | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Humulene epoxide IICAS 19888-34-7 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-ElemeneCAS 20307-84-0 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-0 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-SelineneCAS 17066-67-0 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BicyclogermacreneCAS 24703-35-3 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3779-61-1 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-CymeneneCAS 1195-32-0 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Juniper Berry
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Juniper Berry
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.