Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Orange, Sweet
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
The essential oil of the Sweet Orange is delightfully bright and cheery, strongly antidepressant. Used in the aroma lamp, it brightens the atmosphere of a room. Blended with any of the spice or coniferous oils it makes a wonderful winter holiday blend. Orange is refreshing and relaxing. Sweet Orange oil (and its “kissing cousin” Blood Orange ) are not believed to be photosensitizers so are safe to use in skincare products. It is generally considered mild enough for use with small children. If you love orange, you owe it to yourself to try this oil. If you ever use orange essential oil internally, you must have this. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. ME-B698006 Batch No. ME-B698013 Batch No. ME-B698014 Batch No.ME-B698016 Batch No. ME-B698019 Batch No. ME-B698018 Batch No. ME-58900 Batch No. ME-59100 Batch No. MX-59287 Batch No. IT-59445 Batch No. IT-59498 (Current Batch) BLENDS WITH: : Geranium, Lavender, Neroli, Petitgrain, all woods and spices. Citrus sinensis, wild, natural, cold-pressed rind, Italy. – Strong anti-depressant – Non-phototoxic safe in skincare products – A favorite oil with children
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | d8e97fbf892f347846589495ab7a54a2 | USD 13.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. ME-B698006Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ME-B698013Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ME-B698014Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No.ME-B698016Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ME-B698019Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ME-B698018Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ME-58900Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ME-59100Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MX-59287Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IT-59445Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IT-59498 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
4 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, botanical name. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 92.91% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 2.84% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 0.86% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.58% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octanal | 0.55% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DecanalCAS 112-31-2 | 0.48% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-3-CareneCAS 13466-78-9 | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonanal | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CitronellalCAS 106-23-0 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| ValenceneCAS 4630-07-3 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octyl acetateCAS 112-14-1 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octanol | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neral | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CopaeneCAS 18252-44-3 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Orange, Sweet
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Orange, Sweet
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.