Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Cape Chamomile

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:46 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Just arrived. Our description from years ago: For years we’ve had requests to bring in this rare South African oil, and I’ve resisted. We seldom jump on the bandwagon for newly available essential oils, but we finally gave in to the pleading of some of our professional clients. And when the shipment arrived…I fell in love! Although its common name is Cape Chamomile, this translucent light blue oil is not related to the more common Roman and German Chamomiles. One distiller calls it “Cape Snow Bush” but other authorities say that is a different species. Cape Chamomile does contain traces of azulene, which gives it its stunning light blue color, but that is the only commonality with German Chamomile. Although I have seen it recommended for skin care and pain relief as an anti-inflammatory, I would not use it in this manner. It has other, perhaps more valuable uses. Cape Chamomile Essential Oil may be the *ultimate* stress reliever! It is extraordinarily high in esters, over 50%, which account for its sweet fruity aroma. Many of the esters seem to be unique to this delightful oil. It is also high in linalyl acetate. Aromatically it is sweet, light and fruity. Reminiscent of Blue Tansy (Tanecetuum anuum) and some Chamomile specimens. Bodyworker Pam Ritzau writes: I think it is a wonderful oil for modern life and nerves…for those times when you wake up at 4 a.m. thinking of all the things you need to do, or that you wish were different in life etcetera. I use just a few drops as an anointing, particularly third eye, thyroid, back of neck (back of third eye?) heart and inhalation, and it almost instantly calms and puts things back in perspective. My very gifted cranial sacral therapist says a couple of inhalations and a few drops on forehead and heart saves her about 30 minutes of work with a client, allowing her to get past tension almost immediately and begin deeper work. Send me 15 ml as soon as you can, please. If I could only have one oil in this hurly burly world of cell phones, faxes, demands for immediate performance, and modern civilization in general, this would be my choice. Thank you. Pam Pam’s description is why we imported it. My experience with it has been wonderful. First, I love the aroma, so I was eager to experiment with it. And the other night I had one of those nights when I was just feeling PRESSURED. The to-do list kept running through my head, and I felt as though the weight of the world was on my shoulders. Normally speaking, our SleepEase Synergy will banish anything disturbing my sleep…but not that night. Finally, at about 2:00 a.m. I added a few drops of the Cape Chamomile sample I had brought home to my Aromastone. That, literally, is all that I remember until morning. And I awoke with no feelings of stress or urgency. Just wish I had thought to add a few drops to a bath before trying to sleep! When I finally make time for a massage, this is the essential oil that I am bringing with me! Safety: No known contraindications, b

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier sited6eb9aa5aa0421ae97d6ffb682ad288cUSD 25.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

5 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, origin, analysis method, exact analysis date, extraction method, batch. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 138.47%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
SA-58999
Report botanical identity
Cape Chamomile
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Steam Dist., flowers
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Nov 2, 12:00 AM UTC
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
2-Methylbutyl isobutyrateCAS 2445-69-426.28%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isobutyl isobutyrateCAS 97-85-88.55%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Methylbutyl 2-methylbutyrateCAS 2445-78-55.92%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
3-Methylpentyl angelateCAS 53082-58-94.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoamyl tiglateCAS 41519-18-03.80%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoamyl isobutyrateCAS 2050-01-33.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinen-4-olCAS 562-74-32.62%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isobutyl angelateCAS 7779-81-91.92%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isopentyl 2-methylbutyrate1.90%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isobutyl 2-methylbutyrate1.84%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
BorneolCAS 507-70-01.75%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Artedouglasia oxide CCAS 115403-98-01.60%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Laciniatafuranone H1.43%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Methyl Butyl Isovalerate1.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CamphorCAS 76-22-21.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-CymeneCAS 99-87-61.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isobutyl tiglate1.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-50.96%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-40.78%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
30.47 Laciniata furanone E0.57%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
31.22 Artedouglasia oxide D0.57%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SpathulenolCAS 6750-60-30.53%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Pentyl propionate?0.50%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Dehydroxylinalool oxide0.49%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Dehydroxy linalool oxide0.46%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-50.42%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoamyl methacrylate0.40%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Methylbutyl acetate0.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-50.31%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-60.30%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoamyl angelateCAS 10482-55-00.29%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1,8-CineoleCAS 470-82-60.27%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-30.26%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
29.96 Laciniata furanone isomer?0.26%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-80.24%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol0.20%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-CaryophylleneCAS 118-65-00.20%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Ledol0.20%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
9.19 Heptyl acetate <2->0.19%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CampheneCAS 79-92-50.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LimoneneCAS 138-86-30.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Neryl acetateCAS 141-12-80.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isobutyl methacrylate0.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
TerpinoleneCAS 586-62-90.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
29.96 Laciniata furanone G?0.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol0.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Carveol0.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Bornyl acetateCAS 76-49-30.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
T-CadinolCAS 5937-11-10.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
BicyclogermacreneCAS 24703-35-30.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Butyl angelate0.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoamyl isovalerate0.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
IsopulegolCAS 89-79-20.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-SelineneCAS 17066-67-00.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
ViridiflorolCAS 552-02-30.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Hexanone0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PineneCAS 127-91-30.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-90.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Humulene epoxide IICAS 19888-34-70.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
PinocarvoneCAS 30460-92-50.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Methyl eugenolCAS 93-15-20.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Copaen-4-alpha-ol0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Longicyclene0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoamyl acetate0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoamyl propionate0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
GlobulolCAS 489-41-80.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Propyl isobutyrate0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
UK CompoundNot quantifiedNo comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
71 measurements in this report · 68 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Cape Chamomile

    Analytical document archived for published batch SA-58999; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Cape Chamomile

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.