Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Catnip
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:12 PM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
When I first sampled a scent strip of this new to us oil my thought was, now I know why cats roll around in catnip…because I simply wanted to roll in this. Mental image of a grassy meadow, with small wildflowers blooming in the grass, fresh rich loam between your toes… there your have this delightful new oil.. A bit earthy, a bit grassy, but a floral note buried in there somewhere. Somehow, it’s complexity draws you in, and makes you want more. In addition to be a mosquito repellant, this delightful oil is a relaxant. It can help lull you to sleep, ease a tension headache, and, when diffused, brighten and lighten the atmosphere of a room. Supposedly family friendly for all ages, but if I wanted a mosquito repellant for a baby or toddler I would first reach for our Lavandin Hydrosol, both effective and gentle, safest for wee ones. For topical use, dilute at from 1 to 3%. Not to be taken internally. Batch #SP-59166 Blends well with: Bergamot, Clary Sage, Lavender, Lemon, Rosalina, Sandalwood and Roman Chamomile Nepeta cataria L. Organically grown, steam distilled by an artisan distiller in Spain. *Delightful “floral meadow” aroma *Reputed to be a powerful mosquito repellant *Long lasting aroma
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | USD 14.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch #SP-59166Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
1 report connected; 1 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
1 source document archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nepetalactone<4a-alpha,7-alpha,7a-alpha-> | 78.79% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 6.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene | 1.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-6 | 1.38% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nepetalactone<4a-alpha,7-beta,7a-alpha-> | 0.93% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nepetalactone isomer | 0.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene | 0.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Cyclocitral | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Farnesene | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Sesquisabinene hydrate | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neral | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranial | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Alloocimene | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-CaryophylleneCAS 118-65-0 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Humulene epoxide IICAS 19888-34-7 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Ethyl 2-methylbutyrate | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| StyreneCAS 100-42-5 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl salicylate Phenolic | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-3-Hexenyl benzoate | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octan-3-oneCAS 106-68-3 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-alpha-Farnesene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octen-3-olCAS 3391-86-4 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DecanalCAS 112-31-2 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tridecane Alkane | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Thujone | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonanal | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Chrysanthemal | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-DihydrocarvoneCAS 5948-04-9 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| UK Catnip | Not quantified | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Catnip
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Catnip
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.