Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Lavender, Spike
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:07 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Antibacterial oil, please do not substitute for other lavenders or lavandins. Effective for respiratory infections. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. GC/MS Analysis: December 2014 Batch No. SP-B520027 Batch No. SP-B520034 Batch No. SP-B520035 Batch No. SP-B520036 Batch No. SP-58853 Batch No. ES-59319 (Current Batch) Lavandula latifolia, ethically farmed, steam-distilled flowering tops, Spain. – Anti-bacterial – Effective for respiratory infections.
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 421362ec114c6552383afcf212f4b8cc | USD 17.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- December 2014Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SP-B520027Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SP-B520034Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SP-B520035Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SP-B520036Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SP-58853Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ES-59319 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
3 reports connected; 3 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
3 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: exact analysis date, botanical name, plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| linalol | 40.72% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cineol - 1,8 | 28.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| camphre | 11.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| β pineneCAS 127-91-3 | 2.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| α bisaboleneCAS 17627-44-0 | 1.84% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| α pineneCAS 80-56-8 | 1.74% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| limoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 1.71% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| β caryophyllene | 1.43% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| α terpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 0.93% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| borneolCAS 507-70-0 | 0.85% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| sabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| γ terpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.59% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| campheneCAS 79-92-5 | 0.55% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| myrcene | 0.50% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| germacrene dCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.38% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis β ocimene | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para cymene | 0.35% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| terpinene 4 ol | 0.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| tricycleneCAS 508-32-7 | 0.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans β farnesene | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| terpinolene | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| α humulene | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| hexyl butyrate | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| δ cadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| α terpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| linalyl acetateCAS 115-95-7 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| octanone 3 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans β ocimene | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| nerolCAS 106-25-2 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| lavandulolCAS 498-16-8 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| caryophyllene oxyde | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Lavender, Spike
Analytical document archived for published batch SP-B520036; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Lavender, Spike
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.