Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Mandarine, Green

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

I hadn’t planned on offering two Mandarine oils. But then I sampled this wonderfully tart green oil and fell in love. Clear green in color, and deliciously tart in fragrance, this Green Mandarine is like no citrus oil I’ve experience. Perhaps a blend of lime, lemon, orange, and key lime? It is tart and uplifting. Kristen Leigh Bell says it is the most relaxing of the citrus oils, and it forms a key component of our new SleepEase Synergy. One of the few “sun-safe” Citrus essential oils. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. GC/MS Analysis: 2013 IT-B592001 BR-B590017 BR-B590019 BR-58746 BR-59076 BR-59327 IT-59444 (Current Batch) Citrus reticulata blanco (Citrus deliciosa / Citrus nobilis), organically produced, cold-pressed rind, Italy – Tart and uplifting – Most relaxing citrus oil – Sun-safe

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site9d4bdde9e64074130e3abbd1c7a355f0USD 22.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

2 reports connected; 2 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Supplier report information is available
Documented

2 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Citrus nobilis
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: May 30, 12:00 AM UTC
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
LimoneneCAS 138-86-357.46%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-423.58%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-83.16%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrcene2.59%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PineneCAS 127-91-32.51%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isoterpinolene1.45%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Methyl N-methyl anthranilate Phenolic1.34%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-21.30%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymene1.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-50.73%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-SinensalCAS 17909-77-20.55%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E,E)-alpha-Farnesene0.54%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SabineneCAS 3387-41-50.42%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-50.38%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LinaloolCAS 78-70-60.37%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Caryophyllene0.28%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
ThymolCAS 89-83-80.21%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Octanal0.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
DecanalCAS 112-31-20.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-SelineneCAS 473-13-20.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-20.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinen-4-ol0.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-50.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Perilla aldehydeCAS 2111-75-30.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Ascaridole0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-Ocimene0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
DodecanalCAS 112-54-90.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Nonanal0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
MentholCAS 89-78-10.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CitronellalCAS 106-23-00.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CampheneCAS 79-92-50.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Humulene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
32 measurements in this report · 32 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Mandarine, Green

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Mandarine, Green

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.