Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Sandalwood, Australian, 10% Dilution
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:50 PM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
There has been much controversy about “Australian Sandalwood” for as long as I have been involved with essential oils. Some, mostly the Australian producers, say that it is a sustainable crop. Other experts say no, that the plantations are not successful and the trees are not growing well, that it is not a sustainable crop. Others say that solvent extraction, as well as distillation, is used in the process. And, frankly, it has never struck me as an acceptable aromatic substitute for true Indian Sandalwood. However, my Australian colleagues have long stressed the potent anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory effects of Santalum spicatum. For years I’ve ignored this evidence, but I’ve been reading the research studies showing that Australian Sandalwood Oil is effective against a broad range of gram positive and negative bacteria, including strep and staph, as well as being effective against candida. In fact, according to Mark Webb, Australian Sandalwood has proven more effective than Tea Tree against staph, and at least as effective as Tea Tree in battling candida. The oil’s high farnesol content has shown it to be useful against acne, as well as the fungi causing ringworm and athlete’s foot. I see it being a skin care oil for the men in your life; and am thinking how useful it would be added to our Organic Liquid Castile or Shower Gel. Couple the above information with a more aromatically pleasing specimen than we’ve received in the past, and voila! Available pure and undiluted, and in this 10% Dilution in Fractionated Coconut Oil. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. AU-HG-37 Batch No. AU-HG-50 Batch No. AU-59057 Image courtesy of The Paperbark Co. Santalum spicatum, ethically farmed, steam-distilled from heartwood, Australia. Diluted in Fractionated Coconut Oil. – anti-bacterial – effective against a broad range of gram positive and negative bacteria – skin care oil for men
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | a3ecd9994365cc5ef0f3d1262d45795b | USD 12.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. AU-HG-37Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-HG-50Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-59057Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
3 reports connected; 3 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
3 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, percentage basis. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 172.27%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| cis-alpha-Santalol | 30.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-Santalol 1668.00 | 30.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-beta-Santalol | 14.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-beta-Santalol 1713.75 | 14.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-SantaleneCAS 512-61-8 | 5.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Santalene 1426.50 | 5.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BisabololCAS 15352-77-9 | 5.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Bisabolol 1666.25 | 5.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-SantaleneCAS 511-59-1 | 4.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Santalene 1464.00 | 4.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Curcumene | 3.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Curcumene 1512.00 | 3.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-trans-alpha-Bergamotol | 3.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-trans-alpha-Bergamotol 1684.20 | 3.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| epi-beta-SantaleneCAS 25532-78-9 | 3.00% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| epi-beta-Santalene 1450.25 | 3.00% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Dendrolasin | 2.96% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Dendrolasin 1573.35 | 2.96% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Nerolidol | 2.87% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Nerolidol 1567.00 | 2.87% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-CurcumeneCAS 28976-68-3 | 1.95% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Curcumene 1476.00 | 1.95% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-4 | 1.90% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-Bergamotene 1435.00 | 1.90% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Acoradiene 1475.00 | 1.75% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Selinene 1492.50 | 1.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| epi-alpha-Bisabolol 1684.86 | 1.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Khusilal 1653.00 | 1.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-Bergamotene 1411.50 | 0.94% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Curcumen-12-ol 1754.00 | 0.79% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| ar-Curcumene 1480.50 | 0.56% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Lanceol 1765.00 | 0.52% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sesquicineole 1515.20 | 0.50% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Bisabolol 1684.43 | 0.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Selinene 1487.57 | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Santene 884.00 Normonoterpene | 0.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Humulene epoxide II 1606.43 | 0.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-Farnesol 1742.60 | 0.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Nuciferol 1755.00 | 0.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-epi-beta-Santalol 1697.23 | 0.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-Santalol 1695.00 | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Cedrene 1410.75 | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Santalal 1335.23 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Cedrene 1428.00 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Acoradiene 1463.00 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Himachalol 1648.50 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Elemene 1389.20 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Acorenol 1629.50 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-gamma-Bisabolene 1535.65 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Santalone 1177.25 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tricyclene 923.00 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellol 1229.25 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| UK Sandalwood | Not quantified | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Sandalwood, Australian, 10% Dilution
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Sandalwood, Australian, 10% Dilution
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.