Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Eucalyptus, Peppermint
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:35 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Sparkling and bright, smelling like a blend of your favorite Eucalyptus species with just a touch of sweet Peppermint, this new addition to our collection is recommended for pain relief, whether from sinus headaches, any other type of headache, arthritis pain, and respiratory problems. I have seen this delightful specimen described as “cooling, refreshing, and energizing.” Peppermint Eucalyptus Oil is said by some to have strong anti-asthmatic properties and to be a remedy against infections of the lower respiratory tract…bronchitis, pneumonia, asthma. Like Frankincense, Eucalyptus dives causes one to breathe deeply and forces the bronchioles to dilate. By diffusion, it is useful for general colds and chest infections. My Australian mentor states, “Eucalyptus dives ct piperitone is excellent as a bronchial dilator and for dealing with lower respiratory tract conditions like bronchitis.” It is also a powerful mucolytic, helpful for loosening up a dry, unproductive cough. SAFETY NOTE: Julia Lawless recommends this oil for all respiratory conditions, sore muscles, rheumatism, headaches, and exhaustion. As with all members of the eucalyptus family, it is highly toxic if taken orally. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: 2013 Batch No. AU-398016 Batch No. AU-398017 Batch No. SA-38515 Batch No. SA-B397001 Batch No. SA-B397002 Batch No. SA-58977 Batch No. ZA-59188 Batch No. ZA-59416 (Current Batch) Eucalyptus dives ct piperitone, organically produced, steam-distilled leaves, South Africa. • Respiratory • Pain relief • Minty aroma. • Safer for Children.
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | c14e49b83f736867c8142263f3034f8e | USD 12.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- 2013Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-398016Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SA-38515Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SA-B397001Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SA-B397002Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. SA-58977Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ZA-59188Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ZA-59416 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
4 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, exact analysis date, botanical name, batch, percentage basis. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36.351 Piperitone | 39.54% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 19.050 Phellandrene <alpha-> | 27.50% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.201 Cymene <para-> | 5.92% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 31.107 Terpinen-4-ol | 4.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 14.081 Thujene <alpha-> | 3.88% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 24.355 Terpinolene | 2.69% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.640 Phellandrene <beta> | 2.56% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 17.811 Myrcene | 1.87% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 19.686 Terpinene <alpha-> | 1.82% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 22.461 Terpinene <gamma> | 1.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 32.093 Terpineol <alpha-> | 1.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 25.284 Linalool | 0.89% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 52.028 Bicyclogermacrene | 0.73% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.735 1,8-Cineole | 0.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 51.735 Viridiflorene | 0.55% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 47.284 Caryophyllene | 0.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 21.589 Ocimene <E-beta> | 0.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 14.538 Pinene <alpha> | 0.50% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.509 Limonene | 0.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 49.825 Alloaromadendrene | 0.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 57.443 Viridiflorol | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 24.674 Dehydro-p-cymene | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 48.465 Copaene <beta> | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 27.108 Menth-2-en-1-ol <cis-p> | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 32.664 Phellandrene epoxide <alpha> | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 35.855 Carvotanacetone | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 57.964 Isomer of alloaromanderene | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 60.095 Eudesmol <10-epi-gamma-> | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 16.866 Sabinene | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 28.364 Menth-2-en-1-ol <trans-p> | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 31.486 Cymen-8-ol <para-> | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 46.494 Gurjunene <alpha> | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 58.089 Guaiol | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 61.418 Eudesmol <alpha> | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.868 Ocimene <Z-beta> | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 45.284 Elemene <beta> | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 39.105 Carvacrol | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 56.890 Spathulenol | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 58.696 Eudesm-5-en-11-ol | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 17.215 Pinene <beta-> | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 33.054 Piperitol <cis> | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 41.505 Elemene <delta> | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 51.480 Cadina-1(6),4-diene <trans> | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 59.671 Eudesmol <5-epi-7-epi-alpha> | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Eucalyptus, Peppermint
Analytical document archived for published batch SA-38515; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Eucalyptus, Peppermint
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.