Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Eucalyptus, Peppermint

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:35 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Sparkling and bright, smelling like a blend of your favorite Eucalyptus species with just a touch of sweet Peppermint, this new addition to our collection is recommended for pain relief, whether from sinus headaches, any other type of headache, arthritis pain, and respiratory problems. I have seen this delightful specimen described as “cooling, refreshing, and energizing.” Peppermint Eucalyptus Oil is said by some to have strong anti-asthmatic properties and to be a remedy against infections of the lower respiratory tract…bronchitis, pneumonia, asthma. Like Frankincense, Eucalyptus dives causes one to breathe deeply and forces the bronchioles to dilate. By diffusion, it is useful for general colds and chest infections. My Australian mentor states, “Eucalyptus dives ct piperitone is excellent as a bronchial dilator and for dealing with lower respiratory tract conditions like bronchitis.” It is also a powerful mucolytic, helpful for loosening up a dry, unproductive cough. SAFETY NOTE: Julia Lawless recommends this oil for all respiratory conditions, sore muscles, rheumatism, headaches, and exhaustion. As with all members of the eucalyptus family, it is highly toxic if taken orally. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: 2013 Batch No. AU-398016 Batch No. AU-398017 Batch No. SA-38515 Batch No. SA-B397001 Batch No. SA-B397002 Batch No. SA-58977 Batch No. ZA-59188 Batch No. ZA-59416 (Current Batch) Eucalyptus dives ct piperitone, organically produced, steam-distilled leaves, South Africa. • Respiratory • Pain relief • Minty aroma. • Safer for Children.

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier sitec14e49b83f736867c8142263f3034f8eUSD 12.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Supplier report information is available
Documented

4 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, exact analysis date, botanical name, batch, percentage basis. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
SA-38515
Report botanical identity
Eucalyptus dives
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
36.351 Piperitone39.54%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
19.050 Phellandrene <alpha->27.50%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
20.201 Cymene <para->5.92%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
31.107 Terpinen-4-ol4.70%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
14.081 Thujene <alpha->3.88%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
24.355 Terpinolene2.69%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
20.640 Phellandrene <beta>2.56%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
17.811 Myrcene1.87%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
19.686 Terpinene <alpha->1.82%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
22.461 Terpinene <gamma>1.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
32.093 Terpineol <alpha->1.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
25.284 Linalool0.89%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
52.028 Bicyclogermacrene0.73%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
20.735 1,8-Cineole0.70%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
51.735 Viridiflorene0.55%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
47.284 Caryophyllene0.53%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
21.589 Ocimene <E-beta>0.51%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
14.538 Pinene <alpha>0.50%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
20.509 Limonene0.47%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
49.825 Alloaromadendrene0.33%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
57.443 Viridiflorol0.22%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
24.674 Dehydro-p-cymene0.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
48.465 Copaene <beta>0.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
27.108 Menth-2-en-1-ol <cis-p>0.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
32.664 Phellandrene epoxide <alpha>0.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
35.855 Carvotanacetone0.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
57.964 Isomer of alloaromanderene0.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
60.095 Eudesmol <10-epi-gamma->0.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
16.866 Sabinene0.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
28.364 Menth-2-en-1-ol <trans-p>0.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
31.486 Cymen-8-ol <para->0.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
46.494 Gurjunene <alpha>0.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
58.089 Guaiol0.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
61.418 Eudesmol <alpha>0.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
20.868 Ocimene <Z-beta>0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
45.284 Elemene <beta>0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
39.105 Carvacrol0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
56.890 Spathulenol0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
58.696 Eudesm-5-en-11-ol0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
17.215 Pinene <beta->0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
33.054 Piperitol <cis>0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
41.505 Elemene <delta>0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
51.480 Cadina-1(6),4-diene <trans>0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
59.671 Eudesmol <5-epi-7-epi-alpha>0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
44 measurements in this report · 44 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Eucalyptus, Peppermint

    Analytical document archived for published batch SA-38515; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Eucalyptus, Peppermint

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.