Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Celery Seed CO2
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:46 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Oh my goodness! Jim brought me a scent strip of this new Celery Seed Extract and I wanted to eat it! Crisp, green, crunchy… it smells like the ultimate stalk of fresh Celery. Not what I had expected! Very yummy. But we didn’t bring it in because it smells yummy. Celery Seed CO2 is a powerful diuretic, a detoxifier, and a tonic for the urinary system. Madeleine Kerkhof recommends it for treating gout, for pain stemming from inflammation, for edema, in a sitz bath for treating cystitis, for cleansing and detox. If fluid retention is contributing to high blood pressure it could be helpful for that, as well. Recent research suggests celery seed CO2 extract may also be an effective antifungal. This powerful aromatic extract will probably be most useful by inhalation, either just from a tissue, or from a personal inhaler. For topical use, normally used in 1 or 2%, although you could go as high as 4% for a small area. Madeleine says to avoid use with small children, and avoid topical use while pregnant. Batch # GE-861424 Batch #GE-58863 Batch #GE-59206 Batch # DE-59331 (Current Batch) Apium graveolens, seed oil, CO2 total, contains both essential oil and lipid components. Seeds grown in India, CO2 extracted in Germany •Avoid use during pregnancy •Do not use with small children •Diuretic and Detoxifier •Inflammation, Edema
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 11ac0738e7e2f88925f74093c3bd5764 | USD 12.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch # GE-861424Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch #GE-58863Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch #GE-59206Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch # DE-59331 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
3 reports connected; 3 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
3 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, analysis method, percentage basis, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentages describe an extract fraction, not the whole product. The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentages describe an extract fraction, not the whole product. The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. A source date requires review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The percentages describe an extract fraction, not the whole product. The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sedanolide | 55.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 22.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Butyl PhthalideCAS 6066-49-5 | 7.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta Selinene / alpha Selinene | 1.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Butyl-1,4-cycloheptadiene | 0.67% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta CaryophylleneCAS 87-44-5 | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta MyrceneCAS 123-35-3 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Celery Seed CO2
Analytical document archived for published batch GE-59206; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Celery Seed CO2
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.