Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Fir, Siberian
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:34 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Another conifer? Yes, I thought the same thing. Our Aromatic Medicine instructor, Mark Webb teaches this oil, and when I suggested substituting one of the other Fir oils we stock he said, “I like this one because it is so high in esters.” (Esters, as I hope you remember, are the RELAXING component of the most relaxing essential oils.) So I looked at the GC of one a trusted friend was offering, and what leaped out at me was the extraordinarily high level of one ester, borneol acetate…the major component of this oil. SO…we bought some, sight unseen. And I fell in love. Now, I love conifers. I’m a pushover for a new tree oil. Distillers know this, so I buy far too many, our clients get confused about all of them, and end up not buying ANY. So I wasn’t going to stock this. But… I love the conifers. And I love to diffuse them. But some of them can keep me awake at night. A *relaxing* conifer? Yes indeedy! With the new safety warnings cautioning restricted use of the Eucalypts and other oils high in cineole with toddlers and babies, mothers are always seeking oils they can safely diffuse to help with stuffy noses and congestion. Robert Tisserand has recommended the conifers, across the board, as safe and gentle decongestants. Now, I’m a grandma, no littles currently in my care. But I remember the nights my babies were fussy and cranky and couldn’t sleep because they were all stuffed up and couldn’t breath. And I realized that a conifer that might help with a stuffy nose and might also help a wee one (or an adult!) relax into sleep could well become a mother’s best friend. Aromatically, most conifers are top notes, high and free. To my nose this Siberian Fir oil is deeper, perhaps a high heart note and sweeter than most of our “needle oils.” Michelle was pouring it this afternoon and mentioned that she really dislikes working with the conifers, they just leave her too scattered. But this new Siberian Fir felt warm and comforting. It tends to last longer on a scent strip as well, it will contribute to the “staying power” of your blend. Safety: No contraindications with normal aromatherapy usage. As with all conifers, avoid oxidation. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. AU-76402 Batch No. AU-764023 Batch No. AU-764024 Batch No. AU-764025 Batch No. RU-58881 Batch No. RU-59041 Batch No. RU-59220 Batch No. RU-59517 (Current Batch, Final Analysis In Process) Blends With: Other Conifers, Citrus oils, Oakmoss, Rosemary, Juniper, Labdanum, Patchouli, and Lavandin. Abies sibirica, wild harvested in Russia. (Commercially called Siberian Pine, but it is a true fir.) • Very relaxing • Useful for children with congestion • Warm and comforting
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 641c10517c6295981814c848e789ee82 | USD 12.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. AU-76402Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-764023Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-764024Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-764025Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. RU-58881Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. RU-59041Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. RU-59220Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
3 reports connected; 3 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
3 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, extraction method. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bornyl acetateCAS 76-49-3 | 32.95% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 19.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 11.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-3-CareneCAS 13466-78-9 | 10.84% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 8.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Santene Normonoterpene | 2.63% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TricycleneCAS 508-32-7 | 2.47% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 2.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BorneolCAS 507-70-0 | 1.65% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CaryophylleneCAS 87-44-5 | 1.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TerpinoleneCAS 586-62-9 | 1.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-HumuleneCAS 6753-98-6 | 0.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MyrceneCAS 123-35-3 | 0.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 0.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| epi-alpha-BisabololCAS 78148-59-1 | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DodecanalCAS 112-54-9 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-4 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CamphorCAS 76-22-2 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-CymeneCAS 99-87-6 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Camphene hydrateCAS 465-31-6 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-olCAS 562-74-3 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LongifoleneCAS 475-20-7 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-gamma-Bisabolene | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-UndecanoneCAS 112-12-9 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Dodecanol | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Isoterpinolene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymen-8-olCAS 1197-01-9 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-HimachaleneCAS 3853-83-6 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Longipinanol | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| GlobulolCAS 489-41-8 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DecanalCAS 112-31-2 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Methyl thymol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Menthyl acetateCAS 16409-45-3 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-yl acetate | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neryl acetateCAS 141-12-8 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sibirene | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ChamigreneCAS 19912-83-5 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-HimachaleneCAS 1461-03-6 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-CymeneneCAS 1195-32-0 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Mentha-1,5-dien-8-olCAS 1686-20-0 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Cryptone | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Carvyl acetate | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-SelineneCAS 17066-67-0 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-NerolidolCAS 40716-66-3 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3338-55-4 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Fenchol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Campholene aldehyde | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinocarveol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Fenchyl acetate | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NerolCAS 106-25-2 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Phellandral | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Perilla aldehydeCAS 2111-75-3 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Dihydrocarvyl acetateCAS 20777-49-5 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-YlangeneCAS 14912-44-8 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Humulene epoxide IICAS 19888-34-7 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Manool oxide | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Manool | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Toluene Simple Phenolic | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Undecane Alkane | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Longipinene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellyl acetateCAS 150-84-5 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-TridecanoneCAS 593-08-8 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Dodecyl acetate | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| PogostolCAS 21698-41-9 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Fir, Siberian
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Fir, Siberian
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.