Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Lime Rind, Kaffir
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
We have offered Combava Petitgrain, the oil distilled from the leaf of the Cistrus hystrix, the Kaffir Lime, also called Makrut Lime. Now we are able to offer the oil from the zest, as well. This is an unusual Citrus oil, far lower in d-limonene than most citrus oils, it is a deeper note, for perfumery, rather than the light top note we expect from a citrus oil. Buried amid its complexities is a slim strand of light, sunny true lime. An interesting oil indeed. I first read about this extremely rare citrus oil in Robert Tisserand’s skincare course. (Also where I learned about our rare Rosemary ch A-pinene.) In teaching about treatments for acne vulgaris, Robert referenced studies showing the effectiveness of both these oils against Proprionibacterium Acne. Of the more “benign” essential oils these were the most effective, and definitely worth trying in anti-acne products. In addition, Jennifer Rhind cited research indicating that Kaffir Lime oil may also have anti-inflammatory properties when used in skincare. Rhind also indicates that Kaffir Lime’s high level of terpines and monoterpenols might make it an effective addition to a pain relieving blend based on traditional Thai herbal medicine, combining with Plai, and just a hint of Lemongrass. She also stresses the mood elevating effect of Kaffir Lime, a bit stimulating and, like most other Citrus oils, a smile bringer. I would not want to use it in a bedtime blend, it is a bit too stimulating, but when facing a lot of challenges in the day ahead, it is definitely a “yes I can” oil. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Safety: According to Essential Oil Safety, 2nd Edition, there are no contraindications or hazards. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. TH-58529 Batch No. TH-58676 Batch No. TH-59143 BLENDS WELL WITH: Plai, and Lemongrass and camphorous oils like Rosemary Camphor for pain relief. Kaffir Lime, (Combava) or Makrut Lime, Citrus hystrix, grown organically, steam-distilled rind, Thailand. – Anti-acne – Effective pain relief – Mood elevating
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | c249c1891229853a3d7e95e1da0fb660 | USD 16.00 | out of stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. TH-58529Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TH-58676Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TH-59143Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
2 reports connected; 2 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
2 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 195.81%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 25.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 18.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 10.77% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 8.83% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 5.85% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 4.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene | 4.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 3.29% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 2.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 2.00% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid) | 1.67% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| IsopulegolCAS 89-79-2 | 1.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| neo-IsopulegolCAS 7786-67-6 | 1.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 0.95% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.93% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,4-CineoleCAS 470-67-7 | 0.64% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-5 | 0.64% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 0.48% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Fenchol | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 0.42% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellol | 0.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BorneolCAS 507-70-0 | 0.38% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellyl acetateCAS 150-84-5 | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 0.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene | 0.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Terpineol | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CitronellalCAS 106-23-0 | 0.22% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Terpineol | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-1-ol | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-EudesmolCAS 1209-71-8 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-FencheneCAS 471-84-1 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CubebeneCAS 13744-15-5 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CadinolCAS 481-34-5 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Cadina-1(6),4-dieneCAS 20085-11-4 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-epi-CubenolCAS 19912-67-5 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-9 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Muurolene | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| GeraniolCAS 106-24-1 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonanal | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Viridiflorene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DecanalCAS 112-31-2 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Cadina-1,4-dieneCAS 38758-02-0 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,10-di-epi-Cubenol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-0 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Elemol | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TricycleneCAS 508-32-7 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-SelineneCAS 17066-67-0 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-alpha-Farnesene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| JunenolCAS 472-07-1 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornylene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Isoborneol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-MuurololCAS 104245-48-9 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Lime Rind, Kaffir
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Lime Rind, Kaffir
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.