Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Pink Grapefruit

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:12 PM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

We have been out of stock of this amazing energizer for at least three years, perhaps longer. All of my sources said “no one is producing the organic oil” and for a long time this seemed true. We certainly couldn’t locate any. I finally found a bit, sent it for testing, and we are so happy to have it back. I never particularly liked Grapefruit Essential Oil until I discovered Pink Grapefruit. It fairly sparkles, it’s so bright and crisp, both energizing and uplifting. Grapefruit is recommended by some authorities for treating eating disorders, both anorexia and overeating, when they stem from lack of self esteem. It seems to create a feeling of internal buoyancy. Of all the citrus oils, Pink Grapefruit is by far the most energizing. I find it impossible to sit still when we are diffusing or pouring Pink Grapefruit. It makes us all want to get up and move! Physically, Pink Grapefruit Essential Oil is also helpful in treating oily skin and hair. Pink Grapefruit, applied topically, is recommended as part of anti-cellulite blends because of its toning and astringent effects. I am a bit skeptical about this effect, when used topically, but many authorities state it. It is also said to stimulate the lymphatic system, and thus help the body remove toxins. Recent research has also shown that inhaling Grapefruit Essential Oil may help reduce the craving for sweets. Couple this with its energizing effect, and it’s clear to see Pink Grapefruit essential oil is truly the dieter’s friend. Safety: Robert Tisserand advises: phototoxicity (low risk), avoid use before exposing to sunlight or tanning bed, maximum dermal use 4%. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. GC/MS Analysis: Batch No. IS-132355 Batch No. US-59195 Batch No. US-59365 Batch No. MX-59443 (Current Batch) Citrus paradisii Organically produced, cold-pressed rind, Mexico

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier siteUSD 12.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

3 reports connected; 3 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Supplier report information is available
Documented

3 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, botanical name, extraction method. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Rind
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Cold Pressed
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
LimoneneCAS 138-86-388.19%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrcene2.81%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Auraptene Coumarin1.25%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-80.85%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Octanal0.64%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SabineneCAS 3387-41-50.59%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
DecanalCAS 112-31-20.48%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Caryophyllene0.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CarvoneCAS 99-49-00.34%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Limonene oxide0.23%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PineneCAS 127-91-30.22%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-50.21%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Limonene oxideCAS 4959-35-70.19%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-CubebeneCAS 13744-15-50.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-CadineneCAS 523-47-70.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Citrusal Coumarin0.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymene0.16%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LinaloolCAS 78-70-60.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-50.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Osthole Coumarin0.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Nonanal0.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geranial0.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-40.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CitronellalCAS 106-23-00.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-Ocimene0.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Octyl acetateCAS 112-14-10.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-50.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-60.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-Terpineol0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Carveol0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Perillyl alcohol0.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-30.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-para-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-90.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Humulene0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CitralCAS 5392-40-50.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Linalyl acetateCAS 115-95-70.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Elemol0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Citronellyl acetateCAS 150-84-50.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
DodecanalCAS 112-54-90.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-Farnesene0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SpathulenolCAS 6750-60-30.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
6,7-Dihydrogeraniol0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Perilla aldehydeCAS 2111-75-30.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Terpinyl acetateCAS 80-26-20.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Sinensal0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1-Octanol0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinen-4-ol0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
NootkatoneCAS 4674-50-40.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-50.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinolene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
6,7-Epoxymyrcene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-para-Mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
UndecanalCAS 112-44-70.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Muurolene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-40.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CubebolCAS 23445-02-50.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
57 measurements in this report · 57 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Pink Grapefruit

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Pink Grapefruit

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.