Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Palma Rosa
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:51 PM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
A product of a sweet smelling tropical grass, Palma Rosa Oil smells like a blend of Rose and Geranium Oil. I have seen it offered as “Rose Geranium” so check the Latin name on any Rose Geranium you buy, it may well be Palma Rosa. Palma Rosa Essential Oil is very effective in blends for treating various skin conditions as it helps balance production of sebum, thus being useful for both extremely dry and oily skin. A strongly anti-infectious oil, as well as being antifungal, Palma Rosa may be useful in treating a range of skin infections. I like to add it to any anti-fungal blend. It blends beautifully with geranium, emphasizes the scent of rose in any blend, works well with lavender. Emotionally, it is said to aid in the release of anger and grief. I have occasionally found it useful in a PMS blend. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. GC/MS Analysis: Batch No. NE-48503 Batch No. NE-DOD915 Batch No. IN-58905 Batch No. IN-59045 Batch No. NP-59224 Batch No. IN-59388 Batch No. NP-59398 (Current Batch) BLENDS WITH: Fennel, Lavender, Lemon, Orange, Patchouli, and Sandalwood. Cymbopogon martini, wildcrafted, steam-distilled flowering grass, Nepal. – Effective for skin conditions balancing sebum – Anti-infectious, anti-fungal – Emotionally used for release of anger and grief
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 1c9a9b41f549a9b0b95d2032d5e4365e | USD 15.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. NE-48503Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. NE-DOD915Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-58905Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-59045Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. NP-59224Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IN-59388Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. NP-59398 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
5 reports connected; 5 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
5 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geraniol 1255.29 | 73.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetate 1379.20 | 14.69% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalool 1099.00 | 3.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene 1427.14 | 1.98% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene 1047.70 | 1.58% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,Z)-Farnesol 1725.00 | 0.91% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Farnesol 1723.00 | 0.74% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranial 1272.00 | 0.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene 1037.80 | 0.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene 989.20 | 0.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl butyrate 1558.00 | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxide 1594.86 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neral 1246.57 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-Nerolidol 1542.25 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl formate 1304.35 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Elemene 1389.20 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nerol 1230.67 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Limonene 1029.50 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene 1461.43 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-Farnesyl acetate 1839.67 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Selinene 1492.50 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene 1092.10 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Valencene 1504.00 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl isovalerate 1606.00 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one 982.00 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid) 1075.10 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpineol 1191.71 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Selinene 1487.57 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Alloocimene 1129.90 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Palma Rosa
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Palma Rosa
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.