Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Lemongrass
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Lemongrass is an effective as an antibacterial, effective against both gram- and gram+ pathogens.The citral in lemongrass makes it a skin irritant. Recent research indicates that Lemongrass vapors, by diffusion, are more effective against MRSA than those of any other essential oil tested. This indicates that diffusing Lemongrass to cleanse an area, or inhaling from a personal inhaler could be an effective part of an anti-staph or anti-MRSA routine. Historically, the herbal form of Lemongrass has been used in traditional Indian medicine for infectious illnesses and fever. The essential oil is stimulating and invigorating. It is helpful for treating symptoms of jet lag, clearing the head, and relieving fatigue. Lemongrass essential oil is considered an excellent physical tonic. It is said to boost the parasympathetic nervous system which hastens recovery from illness. Battaglia states that Lemongrass stimulates glandular secretions and muscles to aid in digestion. Thus it could be useful for colitis, indigestion, and gastroenteritis. Lemongrass is an effective skin toner, said to be effective for tightening open pores. There are those who recommend it for treating acne and oily skin. I do not recommend using it on troubled skin since it can be a skin irritant. Maximum safe dermal dilution is 0.7%. WARNING: Contains citral, a strong sensitizer. Avoid use on broken skin. Avoid use during pregnancy (see this blog post on High Citral Oils vs Pregancy. Maximum dilution for topical use: 0.7% (4 drops per fluid ounce). Please also see our blog post on the benefits of inhalation vs. ingesting essential oils. Caution: it may affect diabetes. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. GC/MS Analysis: April 2013 Batch No. HA-48600 Batch No. GU-58908 Batch No. GU-59038 Batch No. NP-59223 Batch No. NP-59397 Batch No. NP 59481 (Current Batch) Lemongrass blends well with Bergamot, Cedarwood (all types), Geranium, Lemon, Niaouli, Palma Rosa, Petitgrain, Rosemary, and Tea Tree. Blended with Rosemary it makes a wonderfully invigorating morning shower blend. Some people substitute the scent for Lemon EO in blends since Lemongrass is a middle, not a top note. Cymbopogon flexuosus, ethically farmed, steam-distilled grass, Nepal. Delightful, sparkling-clean scented.
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | a8a680953a70d659a49bb9c47b688a97 | USD 15.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- April 2013Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. HA-48600Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. GU-58908Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. GU-59038Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. NP-59223Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. NP-59397Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. NP 59481 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
6 reports connected; 6 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
6 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, extraction method. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geranial 1272.00 | 37.72% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neral 1246.57 | 30.83% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geraniol 1255.29 | 7.93% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetate 1379.20 | 5.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Limonene 1029.50 | 2.65% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene 1427.14 | 1.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Isocitral 1183.57 | 1.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Cadinene 1515.29 | 1.30% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalool 1099.00 | 1.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one 982.00 | 1.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 4-Nonanone 1073.00 | 1.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Camphene 950.30 | 0.87% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-Isocitral 1163.50 | 0.77% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Isoeugenol 1460.00 | 0.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxide 1594.86 | 0.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Chrysanthemal 1152.00 | 0.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Cadinene 1524.14 | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellol 1229.25 | 0.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellal 1154.50 | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene 1037.80 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-gamma-Bisabolene 1535.65 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpineol 1191.71 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Borneol 1168.71 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Elemene 1389.20 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene D 1484.71 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Decanal 1206.57 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinene 936.10 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Ylangene 1371.33 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene 1461.43 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene 1047.70 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Rose furan epoxide 1174.25 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Cadinene 1537.86 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Alloocimene 1129.90 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| exo-Isocitral 1143.00 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene 989.20 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinene epoxide 1107.10 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| epi-Cubebol 1493.67 | 0.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tricyclene 923.00 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octanal 998.00 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene 1092.10 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sabinene 973.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Lemongrass
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Lemongrass
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.