Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Rosewood (Bois de Rose)

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:50 PM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

I did not believe that a CITES certified Rosewood existed, and we are just delighted to make this batch available to you. Rosewood, with its woody/floral aroma, can be an aphrodisiac, an antidepressant, and a general balancer to the emotions. In skin care, it is said to stimulate new cell growth, regenerate tissues and help minimize lines and wrinkles. It helps balance both dry and oily skin, and can prove helpful against acne. Rosewood is an integral part of our Rosacea Synergy. Some authorities say it has a hormonal effect, not unlike that claimed for Rose and for Geranium. It blends well with both of these oils. Certificate of Analysis: 2012 Batch No. BR-48526 Batch No: BR-28055 Batch No: BR-31354 Batch No: PE-59008 Batch No. PE-59177 Batch No. PE-59341 (Current Batch) Aniba rosaeodora, Steam Distilled, Peru CITES Certified Fully Sustainable Plantation grown Heartwood and branches. Guilt free!

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site2633f962459a5ca1fbd5f9fb47302396USD 23.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

6 reports connected; 6 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

6 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, percentage basis. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 294.07%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Aniba rosaeodora
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
LinaloolCAS 78-70-683.33%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-51.92%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-51.82%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid)1.76%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid)1.70%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1,8-Cineole1.41%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-SelineneCAS 17066-67-01.33%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-SelineneCAS 473-13-21.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LimoneneCAS 138-86-30.37%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-10.33%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-90.32%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-SelineneCAS 515-17-30.29%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
GeraniolCAS 106-24-10.27%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-GurjuneneCAS 489-40-70.23%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one0.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinen-4-ol0.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Benzyl benzoate Phenolic0.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Linalool oxide (6) (pyranoid)0.16%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Linalool oxide (6) (pyranoid)0.16%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-80.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Hotrienol0.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-CadineneCAS 39029-41-90.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-Nerolidol0.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-60.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PineneCAS 127-91-30.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Caryophyllene0.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Muurolene0.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
11-Selinenol-4,alpha0.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Benzaldehyde Simple Phenolic0.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
NerolCAS 106-25-20.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-90.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymene0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-CalameneneCAS 73209-42-40.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Humulene epoxide IICAS 19888-34-70.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-GuaieneCAS 3691-12-10.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Humulene0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Ledol0.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-3-Hexenyl butyrate0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
GlobulolCAS 489-41-80.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
T-Cadinol0.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrcene0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Neral0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geranial0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Longicyclene0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Viridiflorene0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SpathulenolCAS 6750-60-30.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-beta-Ocimene0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinen-1-ol0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-CubebeneCAS 17699-14-80.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Cadinene0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Calacorene0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1,10-di-epi-Cubenol0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-20.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CampheneCAS 79-92-50.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-ol0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-Ocimene0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-40.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Fenchol0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrcenol0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymen-8-ol0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-CaryophylleneCAS 118-65-00.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-40.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Gleenol0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-MuurololCAS 104245-48-90.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Nootkatol0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
65 measurements in this report · 65 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Rosewood (Bois de Rose)

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Rosewood (Bois de Rose)

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.