Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Bergamot Mint

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:46 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

Hard to believe this delightful oil is a mint! Soft, gently floral in aroma, it reminds me of a blend of our Bulgarian Lavender, with just touches of citrus added. I love it in the aromalamp…not energizing and stimulating like the other mint oils we carry, but gently de-stressing. My research doesn’t find very many therapeutic benefits for this lovely oil, it is mostly used by perfumers for a soft heart note. It’s high in linalol and linalyl acetate (like the lavenders) and is much safer on the skin than other mint oils. Bergamot mint’s lighthearted floral notes make it perfect for use in the bath, or in a relaxing massage blend. It makes a wonderful perfume, either alone, or with a touch of Vetiver to anchor it. Unlike many of the middle notes, it is complex enough to wear alone, but will need frequent reapplying. When musing on its potential the phrase that comes to mind is “blythe spirit”… if you are looking for an non-citrus essential oil to brighten the spirits this is the one! I’ve recently had feedback from clients who have used this delightful EO to deodorize musty closets, cellars, etc. I’ve not tried this application yet, but it certainly is worth keeping in mind. SAFETY: From a safety standpoint, used in proper dilutions, it is neither irritating, sensitizing, nor photosensitizing, so much safer to use than either of the oils whose name it bears. However, Robert Tisserand advises that maximum dermal use 5.7%. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. US-B7380026 Batch No. US-48503 Batch No. US-48601 Batch No. US-10611 Batch No. US-58852 Batch No. US-59022 Batch No. US-59309 Batch No. US-59464 (Current Batch) BLENDS WITH: Citrus, Juniper, Sandalwood, Spearmint, Vetiver. Mentha citrata, sustainably farmed, steam-distilled leaves, USA. • Gently fruity/floral. • De-stressing. • Perfumery. • Deodorizing.

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site5b889b2302dc5dec821c601ca120db0dUSD 17.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

6 reports connected; 6 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

6 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 195.29%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
US-59309
Report botanical identity
Mentha citrata
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Feb 15, 12:00 AM UTC
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
Linalyl acetateCAS 115-95-767.98%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LinaloolCAS 78-70-618.87%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
IsocaryophylleneCAS 118-65-02.15%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-31.51%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
MyrceneCAS 123-35-31.20%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-51.12%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-50.92%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Neryl acetateCAS 141-12-80.77%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3779-61-10.65%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Octan-3-yl acetate0.60%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1,8-CineoleCAS 470-82-60.50%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1-Octenyl-3 acetate0.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3338-55-40.35%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
LimoneneCAS 138-86-30.31%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
ViridiflorolCAS 552-02-30.30%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid)0.24%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
NerolCAS 106-25-20.23%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Methylbutyl 2-methylbutyrateCAS 2445-78-50.22%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
TerpinoleneCAS 586-62-90.09%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-90.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-JasmoneCAS 488-10-80.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-HumuleneCAS 6753-98-60.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CubebolCAS 23445-02-50.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Alloocimene0.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Linalool formate 0.000.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Caryophyllene oxideCAS 1139-30-60.06%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-40.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
IsopinocamphoneCAS 473-62-10.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
SabineneCAS 3387-41-50.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-PineneCAS 127-91-30.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-CopaeneCAS 18252-44-30.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2,5-Diethyltetrahydrofuran0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Methylbutyl isobutyrateCAS 2445-69-40.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid)0.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Terpinen-4-olCAS 562-74-30.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
3-OctanolCAS 589-98-00.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Dehydroxylinalool oxide0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-CymeneCAS 99-87-60.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-Terpineol0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
15.67 Octenol acetate<2Z-> 0.000.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Octanol acetate0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-3-Hexenyl isovalerate0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
CarvoneCAS 99-49-00.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
19.64 Linalool oxide acetate<trans->(pyranoid) 0.000.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Nonyl acetate0.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Citronellyl acetateCAS 150-84-50.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-CopaeneCAS 3856-25-50.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-00.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-2-Hexenal0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
2-Methylbutyl acetate0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-80.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1-Octen-3-olCAS 3391-86-40.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Edulan II, dihydro- Edulan0.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Geranyl formateCAS 105-86-20.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Myrtenyl acetateCAS 1079-01-20.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-FarneseneCAS 18794-84-80.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
allo-AromadendreneCAS 25246-27-90.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
BicyclogermacreneCAS 24703-35-30.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-MuuroleneCAS 10208-80-70.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-CadineneCAS 39029-41-90.01%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
60 measurements in this report · 60 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Bergamot Mint

    Analytical document archived for published batch US-59309; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Bergamot Mint

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.