Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Fir, Douglas
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:34 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
First and foremost, YES it smells like Lord of the Rings…. dare I say Rivendell. One sniff, I closed my eyes, and I was there. Escaped to a daydream, walking through the forests with the harmony of the Elvin realm. I will not go too far deep into this fantasy world, but that is just how heavenly it is. When our shipment arrived, I immediately opened the canister, dipped in a scent strip and passed it around. Roberta’s eyes elated with sensory joy. Confused by its complexity, she described the citrusy notes that popped and softly faded into a fruity spice perched on a Christmas wreath. Douglas-Fir is not a true fir, but has it’s own botanical family, Pseudosuga menzesii, False Hemlock. We would have never known it was not a conifer in technicalities, but with our hearts it exudes the smell of an authentic fir the likes of Siberian Fir or Balsam Fir. I was introduced to this exquisite oil a year ago, and finally we have brought it to you. We are one of few suppliers in the U.S. offering it unadulterated straight from the distiller. We were holding out on introducing it until the holidays came around as a special treat, but recently was prodded by Lora Cantele of the International Journal of Professional Holistic Aromatherapy. She reminded me of an article she recently wrote about her same experience with this beautiful Douglas Fir. We hope you fall in love, as we did, with yet another environmentally friendly, guilt-free luxury essential oil to add to your repertoire. During the distillation process, the distillers biomass boilers produce an abundance of energy, so much so that they provide other local businesses with renewable energy. How cool is that. As well as the alpha and beta Pinenes found in most conifers, this Douglas Fir is very high in Limonene, which may be what gives it the zesty citrus we detect. A powerful respiratory aid, Douglas Fir oil is also said to be an effective anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and a great stress and anxiety reducer. One of my mentors said it is an important oil to support personal transformation. Dr. Bruce Berkowski suggests that Douglas Fir oil “vibrates to the key of paternal protection and nurturing”, and that the oil may be helpful for dealing with deep feelings of inferiority and of anxiety, especially anxiety fueled by a sense of powerlessness. Some find this specific oil mentally stimulating, so I would use it more frequently during the daytime and perhaps avoid it in the evening. It might be a wonderful ‘in the car’ oil, to help keep the driver alert, while lightening the spirits of all passengers. I guarantee it will be in my diffuser while I do my pre-holiday and possibly post-holiday cleaning. Blends with: Cedarwood, Frankincense, Juniper Berry, Clementine, and Sandalwood. I plan to try blending with Lemon oil for a concentration or mental focus blend. Safety: No contraindications or warnings. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | c76a7363b38f23c957581a61c7679f79 | USD 8.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. NZ-59499 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
1 report connected; 1 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
1 source document archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 19.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 14.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 11.77% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TerpinoleneCAS 586-62-9 | 11.52% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-3-CareneCAS 13466-78-9 | 10.74% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-olCAS 562-74-3 | 5.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 4.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 4.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 2.74% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Citronellyl acetateCAS 150-84-5 | 2.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| MyrceneCAS 123-35-3 | 2.33% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 1.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-CymeneCAS 99-87-6 | 1.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 1.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 0.76% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 0.76% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CitronellolCAS 106-22-9 | 0.71% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornyl acetateCAS 76-49-3 | 0.42% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3779-61-1 | 0.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-CymeneneCAS 1195-32-0 | 0.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymen-8-olCAS 1197-01-9 | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-HumuleneCAS 6753-98-6 | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-para-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LongifoleneCAS 475-20-7 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-OcimeneCAS 3338-55-4 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CitronellalCAS 106-23-0 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Ethyl decanoateCAS 110-38-3 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TricycleneCAS 508-32-7 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CaryophylleneCAS 87-44-5 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Ethyl octanoateCAS 106-32-1 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sibirene | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-PinocarveolCAS 1674-08-4 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| NeralCAS 106-26-3 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-9 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-GurjuneneCAS 22567-17-5 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Methylbutyric acid Aliphatic Acid | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BorneolCAS 507-70-0 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Longipinene | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,4-CineoleCAS 470-67-7 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-5 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-PiperitolCAS 16721-38-3 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-ElemeneCAS 20307-84-0 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 51.98 Abienol 0.00 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Hex-3-en-1-ol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Ethyl hexanoateCAS 123-66-0 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| IsopulegolCAS 89-79-2 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6,9-GuaiadieneCAS 36577-33-0 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-SelineneCAS 473-13-2 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Ledol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 44.68 Totarene 0.00 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Fenchol | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-4 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-CadineneCAS 39029-41-9 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BisaboleneCAS 25532-79-0 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-2-Hexenal | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-1-ol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Mentha-1,5-dien-8-olCAS 1686-20-0 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-YlangeneCAS 14912-44-8 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-MuuroleneCAS 10208-80-7 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Hexanal | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Hexanol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Thuja-2,4(10)-diene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,3,8-para-MenthatrieneCAS 18368-95-1 | Not quantified | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Fir, Douglas
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Fir, Douglas
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.