Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Lavandin Italian
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:07 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
We got a sample of this and had to have it, pure and simple. The grower says that it is Lavandin Grosso. We have offered organic Lavender Grosso for years, from a very trusted source, and aromatically it is nothing like this speciman. To my nose, this Lavandin smells like the Avice Hill Lavender that Chris Burder produces in Australia, flat out the other side of the world, and his is true Angustifolia. So I am very confused. I have printed out the GC of this, and of our French grown Lavandin Grosso, and can not find what is the specific constituent that give this the subtly spicy note that I love in the Avice Hill Lavender. This specimen of Lavandin is much much higher in relaxing Linalol acetate than the French oil, which would make it much more relaxing. Significantly lower in Linalol, so I would not expect much germ killing effect. Lower in 1.8 cineole (aka Eucalyptol) just very different from the French oil.. I trust the distiller implicitly. He offers a chain of transparency going all the way back to the farm the Lavandin was grown on, so I am, for now, going with his GC, listed below. It only gives the major components, and leaves me with more questions than answers. However… aromatically? I LOVE this Lavandin. We use a lot of Lavandin Super in our various relaxation blends, and some pain relief blends, because Dr. Jane Buckle taught us (and our experience has shown) that it can be even more effective than Lavandula angustifolia for relaxation. I plan to experiment with this new Italian Lavandin for the same uses, because of the high level of esters. (Our Lavandin Super has 36.50% Linalyl Acetate. This Hybrid Lavender has 38.37%.) It is, for us, a mystery oil. We do not understand its chemistry or its aroma, but we know that it is exactly what the distiller says it is and we know that it is a delightful addition to our collection. We hope you will love it as much as we do! SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Batch # IT-58744 Batch # IT-58940 Watch owner Marge Clark’s interview with Marco Valussi at the 2018 NAHA Conference here Lavandula x hybrid artisan grown organically in Northern Italy – Relaxation – Pain relief
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 5aaf317b2be88c52d816637aad31dd99 | USD 15.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch # IT-58744Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch # IT-58940Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
1 report connected; 1 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
1 source document archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
A source date requires review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34.138 Linalyl acetate | 35.69% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 23.789 Linalool | 29.63% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 27.029 Camphor | 5.64% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 19.147 Cineole<1,8-> | 4.72% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 29.336 Terpinen-4-ol | 3.71% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 28.751 Borneol | 3.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 36.316 Lavandulyl acetate | 2.89% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 45.327 Caryophyllene <trans-> | 1.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 47.344 Farnesene<(E)-beta-> | 1.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 18.931 Limonene | 0.72% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 49.164 Germacrene D | 0.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 19.310 Ocimene<(Z)-beta-> | 0.67% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 30.319 Terpineol<alpha-> | 0.64% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 50.381 Lavandulyl isovalerate <ent> | 0.52% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 16.346 Myrcene | 0.48% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 13.173 Pinene<alpha-> | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 28.087 Lavandulol | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 24.145 Octen-3-yl acetate<1-> | 0.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 15.742 Octen-3-ol<1-> | 0.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 30.018 Hexyl butanoate | 0.40% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 42.575 Geranyl acetate | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 61.070 Bisabolol<alpha-> | 0.36% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 14.117 Camphene | 0.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 21.657 Sabinene hydrate <cis> | 0.30% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 15.735 Pinene <beta> | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 22.675 Terpinolene | 0.26% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 51.112 Amorphene <delta> | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 51.740 Sesquiphellandrene<beta-> | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 17.742 Hexyl acetate | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.011 Ocimene<(E)-beta-> | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 50.771 Bisabolene <beta-> | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 33.499 Hexyl isovalerate | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 41.288 Neryl acetate | 0.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 39.395 Hexyl tiglate | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 46.133 Bergamotene<alpha-trans-> | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 58.651 Cadinol <epi-alpha> | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 47.662 Neryl-propanoate | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 20.835 Terpinene<gamma-> | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 42.696 Daucene | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 50.537 Farnesene<(E,E)-alpha-> | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 15.411 Sabinene | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 23.984 Hexyl propanoate | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 12.741 Thujene<alpha-> | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 43.233 Sesquithujene<7-epi-> | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 33.067 Hexyl 2-methyl butanoate | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 45.016 Lavandulyl isobutanoate | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 48.588 Dauca-5,8-diene | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 55.224 Caryophyllene oxide | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 18.625 Cymene<para-> | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 22.751 Linalool oxide <trans-(furanoid)> | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 44.184 Sesquithujene | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 17.609 Carene<delta-3-> | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 9.864 Hexanol<n-> | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 43.025 Bourbonene <beta> | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 28.607 Terpineol <delta> | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 46.604 Farnesene<(Z)-beta-> | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 18.129 Terpinene<alpha-> | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 25.587 Ocimene<allo-> | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 32.296 Nerol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 47.580 Humulene <alpha> | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 8.167 Hexane, 1-methoxy- | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Lavandin Italian
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Lavandin Italian
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.