Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Cajeput
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 2:46 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
This cousin of Tea Tree has an odor reminiscent of eucalyptus. The oil is steam-distilled from the leaves. March 2017. We were shocked at the color of this batch, and contacted our supplier, who said, “It is distilled in copper.” I have seen copper distilled oils turn green in the past, but never this bright lime Jello tone, so we sent it out for further testing. The chemist who tested it wrote, “I have scrutinized the tiniest peaks available on my MS analysis, but I did not find anything odd there. No trace of chamazulene, guaiazulene, or dehydrochamazulenes either, which could have explained the phenomenon.” (He also found no trace of contamination. We promptly ordered more, from the same batch, to cover our investment in the extra testing. It’s a relief to be able to make it available to you! As an inhalant, it is stimulating and I find it clears my mind. It’s one of the first oils I reach for at the start of a cold or virus. It also is useful for sore aching muscles, rheumatism, etc. I dilute it down and use as a “chest rub” for bronchial problems. It doesn’t irritate my daughter’s asthma and has an antispasmodic effect that can aid it. It is said to be good for oily skin or acne, but I think it’s a bit strong for skin care. Some authorities say it is an effective insect repellant. It is the BEST immediate first aid for fire ant bites, for those who live where those pests are prevalent. Pam Bryson wrote: And on another note…..Never thought I would need cajeput but had some on hand just in case. Stepped in a small hill of fire ants a couple of weeks ago and remembered I had the cajeput. I immediately applied it undiluted to the bites and the stinging ceased immediately. I thank God for the gifts of nature and people like you who educated others on how to use these gifts. Thanks for the feedback, Pam. I don’t like suggesting that ANY oil be used neat (undiluted) but sometimes you don’t have a choice! SAFETY: Robert Tisserand advises that Cajeput, like other oils high in 1,8-cineole, can cause breathing problems in young children. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 2 to 3 years after you open the bottle. Storing dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: 2013 Batch No. AU-140798 Batch No. AU-16046 Batch No. TH-58845 Batch No. IND-59141 (Current Batch) BLENDS WITH: Bergamot, Birch, Cardamom, Clove Bud, Geranium, Lavender, Myrtle, Nutmeg, Rose, Thyme. Melaleuca cajuputi (syn Melaleuca leucadendron) , Ethically cultivated, steam-distilled leaves, Indonesia. • Stimulating • Achy muscle pain • Respiratory • Useful in bug repellent/after insect bites
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | b7253b19b68944e43b64d25e1a84be29 | USD 16.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- 2013Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-140798Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. AU-16046Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TH-58845Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. IND-59141 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
4 reports connected; 4 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
4 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, percentage basis. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,8-Cineole 1031.80 | 65.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Pinene 936.10 | 5.41% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpineol 1191.71 | 4.97% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene 1427.14 | 4.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Terpinene 1054.00 | 3.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene 1461.43 | 1.87% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Selinene 1487.57 | 1.59% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Selinene 1492.50 | 1.54% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Pinene 974.00 | 1.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpinyl acetate 1353.00 | 0.86% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Aromadendrene 1449.80 | 0.75% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene 1092.10 | 0.71% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene 1024.30 | 0.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Viridiflorol 1596.00 | 0.64% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol 1180.57 | 0.57% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllene oxide 1594.86 | 0.52% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene 989.20 | 0.49% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Phellandrene 1002.00 | 0.46% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Terpinene 1014.00 | 0.39% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-alpha-Farnesene 1508.14 | 0.32% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Cadinene 1515.29 | 0.28% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Thujene 927.80 | 0.24% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Cadinol 1655 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| T-Cadinol 1640.43 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Gurjunene 1412.00 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Ylangene 1371.33 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Copaene 1379.00 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Calamenene 1529.50 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Eudesmol 1652.86 | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Linalool 1099.00 | 0.13% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Elemene 1389.20 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Terpineol 1166.00 | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Guaiol 1603.86 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-Cadinene 1524.14 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Camphene 950.30 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sabinene 973.00 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Cajeput
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Cajeput
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.