GET TO KNOW YOUR OILS
Angelica Root, England
Angelica archangelica
Chemotype: alpha-pinene / beta-phellandrene type
- PLANT PART
- root
- EXTRACTION
- steam distillation
- AROMA NOTE
- base
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
FOLLOW YOUR SENSES
Aroma & character
A closer look at this oil's scent, strength, and staying power.
- Aroma intensity
- 70 / 100
- Note layer
- base
- Approximate tenacity
- 31–31 hours
If you like this scent, explore
A LITTLE CARE GOES A LONG WAY
Using it thoughtfully
Read the full safety context before bringing this oil into your routine.
- Cited dermal maximum · leave-on
- 0.8%
- Phototoxicity
- Phototoxic — use caution
- Maximum for sun-exposed skin
- 0.8%
- Oxidation risk
- medium
A cited maximum is a limit, not a suggested dilution. Missing restrictions do not establish safety.
IFRA Amendment 49 sets a 0.80% maximum acceptable concentration for multiple leave-on categories when angelica root oil is used and the furocoumarin level is unknown.
Contraindications & cautions
- moderateLeave-on dermal use on UV-exposed skin should not exceed 0.80%.
Explore measured chemistry from supplier batches
A supplier report describes a particular sample. Open this workspace to investigate measured constituents and their original documents.
THE SCIENCE BEHIND THE SCENT
Inside the oil
An oil's character comes from its natural chemical composition. Explore each constituent to understand the connections.
About this composition
Liberty Natural's England COA verifies the England origin, root plant part, steam-distilled extraction, and supplier odor description for this lot, but it does not publish a quantified GC constituent table. The constituent percentages below therefore combine the EMA Appendix 1 literature ranges for Angelica archangelica root oil with the published literature averages and representative GC profiles used as typical values here; the oil remains chemotype-sensitive and highly variable by geography and extraction conditions. For archive scoring, odor_intensity is normalized to 70 from live public aroma-band descriptors that place angelica root between medium and medium-strong strength rather than publishing a native 0-100 figure.
| Constituent | Typical amount | Reported range | Chemical family | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| beta-phellandrene | 13.2% | 10–30% | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceFinal reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L. EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: beta-phellandrene 10-30%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports beta-phellandrene 13.2% |
| alpha-phellandrene | 5.7% | 2–20% | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceFinal reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L. EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: alpha-phellandrene 2-20%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports alpha-phellandrene 5.7% |
| alpha-pinene | 29.7% | 4.4–31% | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceFinal reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L. EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: alpha-pinene 4.4-31%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports alpha-pinene 29.7% |
| limonene | 5% | 6–11.53% | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceFinal reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L. EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: limonene 6-11.53%; MDPI 2022 table 1 reports a literature average limonene level of 5.0% across 20 accessions |
| p-cymene | 3.8% | 3.5–11.3% | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceFinal reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L. EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: p-cymene 3.5-11.3%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports p-cymene 3.8% |
| myrcene | 4.1% | 1.4–5.5% | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceFinal reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L. EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: myrcene 1.4-5.5%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports myrcene 4.1% |
| delta-3-carene | 14.2% | 4.5–13% | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceFinal reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L. EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 16/22: delta-3-carene 4.5-13%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports delta-3-carene 14.2% |
| sabinene | 6.1% | 0.4–1.2% | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceFinal reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L. EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 16/22: sabinene 0.4-1.2%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports sabinene 6.1% |
| camphene | 1.88% | 0.2–1.43% | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceFinal reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L. EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 16/22: camphene 0.2-1.43%; TGSC typical GC analysis reports camphene 1.88% |
| beta-Pinene | 1.5% | — | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceRecord = Acimovic et al., Nat Prod Commun 2017, 12(2):205-206 (Mt. Ozren Serbia root: a-pinene 29.7, d-3-carene 14.2, b-phellandrene+limonene 13.2 - exact match). Added minors from A. archangelica root GC-MS profiles: b-pinene 1.28-1.8%, terpinolene 0.28-1.25%, a-copaene 0.93-1.29%, 15-pentadecanolide 0.87%. Nivinskiene et al. J Essent Oil Res 2005, 17(4):373 (via review PMC5620520): roots = 67-80% monoterpenes, 9.6-19.4% sesquiterpenes, 3.9-6.3% macrocyclic lactones. |
| alpha-Copaene | 1.1% | — | sesquiterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceRecord = Acimovic et al., Nat Prod Commun 2017, 12(2):205-206 (Mt. Ozren Serbia root: a-pinene 29.7, d-3-carene 14.2, b-phellandrene+limonene 13.2 - exact match). Added minors from A. archangelica root GC-MS profiles: b-pinene 1.28-1.8%, terpinolene 0.28-1.25%, a-copaene 0.93-1.29%, 15-pentadecanolide 0.87%. Nivinskiene et al. J Essent Oil Res 2005, 17(4):373 (via review PMC5620520): roots = 67-80% monoterpenes, 9.6-19.4% sesquiterpenes, 3.9-6.3% macrocyclic lactones. |
| Terpinolene | 0.9% | — | monoterpene hydrocarbon | View sourceRecord = Acimovic et al., Nat Prod Commun 2017, 12(2):205-206 (Mt. Ozren Serbia root: a-pinene 29.7, d-3-carene 14.2, b-phellandrene+limonene 13.2 - exact match). Added minors from A. archangelica root GC-MS profiles: b-pinene 1.28-1.8%, terpinolene 0.28-1.25%, a-copaene 0.93-1.29%, 15-pentadecanolide 0.87%. Nivinskiene et al. J Essent Oil Res 2005, 17(4):373 (via review PMC5620520): roots = 67-80% monoterpenes, 9.6-19.4% sesquiterpenes, 3.9-6.3% macrocyclic lactones. |
| 15-Pentadecanolide | 0.87% | — | macrocyclic lactone | View sourceRecord = Acimovic et al., Nat Prod Commun 2017, 12(2):205-206 (Mt. Ozren Serbia root: a-pinene 29.7, d-3-carene 14.2, b-phellandrene+limonene 13.2 - exact match). Added minors from A. archangelica root GC-MS profiles: b-pinene 1.28-1.8%, terpinolene 0.28-1.25%, a-copaene 0.93-1.29%, 15-pentadecanolide 0.87%. Nivinskiene et al. J Essent Oil Res 2005, 17(4):373 (via review PMC5620520): roots = 67-80% monoterpenes, 9.6-19.4% sesquiterpenes, 3.9-6.3% macrocyclic lactones. |
Profile source: Liberty Natural Certificate of Analysis - Angelica Root Essential Oil England; IFRA Standard - Angelica root oil; Perflavory angelica root oil · https://www.libertynatural.com/coa/775.htm ; https://ifrafragrance.org/standards/IFRA_STD_086.pdf ; https://www.perflavory.com/docs/doc1022792.html
A TRADITION OF BOTANICAL CURIOSITY
Traditional & reported uses
These uses reflect the profile's reported traditions and literature. They are not established treatment recommendations.
- traditionally used to flavor liquors and vermouth-style preparations
- historically reported in folk medicine as a calming remedy
For aromatherapy and wellness use only — not medical advice. Effect statements are traditional/reported associations, not treatment claims. The Synergy Rating scores blend craft, harmony and safety, not medical efficacy. Read the safety framework.
What we're still learning · 4 data gaps
Good decisions start with knowing what is — and isn't — in the evidence.
- No England-lot-specific quantitative constituent assay was published on the accessible Liberty Natural England COA.
- No public source reviewed in this pass expressed angelica root odor intensity on the dataset's required 0-100 numeric scale; the stored value 70 is an archive normalization of live public descriptors ('Odor Strength: medium' from Perflavory and 'Strength of Initial Aroma: Medium - Strong' from AromaWeb), not a published laboratory number.
- No source-backed volatility_rate value was verified in this pass.
- The accessible literature averages and representative GC profile cover only the major volatile compounds, so the summed pct_typical values remain below a full 70-105% GC coverage target.