A BOTANICAL PROFILE

GET TO KNOW YOUR OILS

Angelica Root, England

Angelica archangelica

Chemotype: alpha-pinene / beta-phellandrene type

sweetvegetable-likemuskyweedyamberspicy
PLANT PART
root
EXTRACTION
steam distillation
AROMA NOTE
base

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

FOLLOW YOUR SENSES

Aroma & character

A closer look at this oil's scent, strength, and staying power.

sweetvegetable-likemuskyweedyamberspicy
Aroma intensity
70 / 100
Soft & subtleBold & expressive
Note layer
base
Approximate tenacity
31–31 hours

If you like this scent, explore

A LITTLE CARE GOES A LONG WAY

Using it thoughtfully

Read the full safety context before bringing this oil into your routine.

Cited dermal maximum · leave-on
0.8%
Phototoxicity
Phototoxic — use caution
Maximum for sun-exposed skin
0.8%
Oxidation risk
medium

A cited maximum is a limit, not a suggested dilution. Missing restrictions do not establish safety.

IFRA Amendment 49 sets a 0.80% maximum acceptable concentration for multiple leave-on categories when angelica root oil is used and the furocoumarin level is unknown.

Contraindications & cautions

  • moderateLeave-on dermal use on UV-exposed skin should not exceed 0.80%.
Read the complete safety guide
Explore measured chemistry from supplier batches

A supplier report describes a particular sample. Open this workspace to investigate measured constituents and their original documents.

THE SCIENCE BEHIND THE SCENT

Inside the oil

13 constituents

An oil's character comes from its natural chemical composition. Explore each constituent to understand the connections.

About this composition

Liberty Natural's England COA verifies the England origin, root plant part, steam-distilled extraction, and supplier odor description for this lot, but it does not publish a quantified GC constituent table. The constituent percentages below therefore combine the EMA Appendix 1 literature ranges for Angelica archangelica root oil with the published literature averages and representative GC profiles used as typical values here; the oil remains chemotype-sensitive and highly variable by geography and extraction conditions. For archive scoring, odor_intensity is normalized to 70 from live public aroma-band descriptors that place angelica root between medium and medium-strong strength rather than publishing a native 0-100 figure.

ConstituentTypical amountReported rangeChemical familySource
beta-phellandrene
13.2%
10–30%monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Final reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L.

EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: beta-phellandrene 10-30%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports beta-phellandrene 13.2%
alpha-phellandrene
5.7%
2–20%monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Final reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L.

EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: alpha-phellandrene 2-20%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports alpha-phellandrene 5.7%
alpha-pinene
29.7%
4.4–31%monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Final reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L.

EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: alpha-pinene 4.4-31%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports alpha-pinene 29.7%
limonene
5%
6–11.53%monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Final reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L.

EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: limonene 6-11.53%; MDPI 2022 table 1 reports a literature average limonene level of 5.0% across 20 accessions
p-cymene
3.8%
3.5–11.3%monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Final reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L.

EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: p-cymene 3.5-11.3%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports p-cymene 3.8%
myrcene
4.1%
1.4–5.5%monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Final reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L.

EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 15/22: myrcene 1.4-5.5%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports myrcene 4.1%
delta-3-carene
14.2%
4.5–13%monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Final reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L.

EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 16/22: delta-3-carene 4.5-13%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports delta-3-carene 14.2%
sabinene
6.1%
0.4–1.2%monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Final reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L.

EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 16/22: sabinene 0.4-1.2%; representative GC profile in MDPI 2022 table 1, sample 19 (Serbia) reports sabinene 6.1%
camphene
1.88%
0.2–1.43%monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Final reflection paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L.

EMA Appendix 1, root oil table, PDF page 16/22: camphene 0.2-1.43%; TGSC typical GC analysis reports camphene 1.88%
beta-Pinene
1.5%
—monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Record = Acimovic et al., Nat Prod Commun 2017, 12(2):205-206 (Mt. Ozren Serbia root: a-pinene 29.7, d-3-carene 14.2, b-phellandrene+limonene 13.2 - exact match). Added minors from A. archangelica root GC-MS profiles: b-pinene 1.28-1.8%, terpinolene 0.28-1.25%, a-copaene 0.93-1.29%, 15-pentadecanolide 0.87%. Nivinskiene et al. J Essent Oil Res 2005, 17(4):373 (via review PMC5620520): roots = 67-80% monoterpenes, 9.6-19.4% sesquiterpenes, 3.9-6.3% macrocyclic lactones.

alpha-Copaene
1.1%
—sesquiterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Record = Acimovic et al., Nat Prod Commun 2017, 12(2):205-206 (Mt. Ozren Serbia root: a-pinene 29.7, d-3-carene 14.2, b-phellandrene+limonene 13.2 - exact match). Added minors from A. archangelica root GC-MS profiles: b-pinene 1.28-1.8%, terpinolene 0.28-1.25%, a-copaene 0.93-1.29%, 15-pentadecanolide 0.87%. Nivinskiene et al. J Essent Oil Res 2005, 17(4):373 (via review PMC5620520): roots = 67-80% monoterpenes, 9.6-19.4% sesquiterpenes, 3.9-6.3% macrocyclic lactones.

Terpinolene
0.9%
—monoterpene hydrocarbon
View source

Record = Acimovic et al., Nat Prod Commun 2017, 12(2):205-206 (Mt. Ozren Serbia root: a-pinene 29.7, d-3-carene 14.2, b-phellandrene+limonene 13.2 - exact match). Added minors from A. archangelica root GC-MS profiles: b-pinene 1.28-1.8%, terpinolene 0.28-1.25%, a-copaene 0.93-1.29%, 15-pentadecanolide 0.87%. Nivinskiene et al. J Essent Oil Res 2005, 17(4):373 (via review PMC5620520): roots = 67-80% monoterpenes, 9.6-19.4% sesquiterpenes, 3.9-6.3% macrocyclic lactones.

15-Pentadecanolide
0.87%
—macrocyclic lactone
View source

Record = Acimovic et al., Nat Prod Commun 2017, 12(2):205-206 (Mt. Ozren Serbia root: a-pinene 29.7, d-3-carene 14.2, b-phellandrene+limonene 13.2 - exact match). Added minors from A. archangelica root GC-MS profiles: b-pinene 1.28-1.8%, terpinolene 0.28-1.25%, a-copaene 0.93-1.29%, 15-pentadecanolide 0.87%. Nivinskiene et al. J Essent Oil Res 2005, 17(4):373 (via review PMC5620520): roots = 67-80% monoterpenes, 9.6-19.4% sesquiterpenes, 3.9-6.3% macrocyclic lactones.

Profile source: Liberty Natural Certificate of Analysis - Angelica Root Essential Oil England; IFRA Standard - Angelica root oil; Perflavory angelica root oil · https://www.libertynatural.com/coa/775.htm ; https://ifrafragrance.org/standards/IFRA_STD_086.pdf ; https://www.perflavory.com/docs/doc1022792.html

A TRADITION OF BOTANICAL CURIOSITY

Traditional & reported uses

These uses reflect the profile's reported traditions and literature. They are not established treatment recommendations.

  • traditionally used to flavor liquors and vermouth-style preparations
  • historically reported in folk medicine as a calming remedy

For aromatherapy and wellness use only — not medical advice. Effect statements are traditional/reported associations, not treatment claims. The Synergy Rating scores blend craft, harmony and safety, not medical efficacy. Read the safety framework.

What we're still learning · 4 data gaps

Good decisions start with knowing what is — and isn't — in the evidence.

  • No England-lot-specific quantitative constituent assay was published on the accessible Liberty Natural England COA.
  • No public source reviewed in this pass expressed angelica root odor intensity on the dataset's required 0-100 numeric scale; the stored value 70 is an archive normalization of live public descriptors ('Odor Strength: medium' from Perflavory and 'Strength of Initial Aroma: Medium - Strong' from AromaWeb), not a published laboratory number.
  • No source-backed volatility_rate value was verified in this pass.
  • The accessible literature averages and representative GC profile cover only the major volatile compounds, so the summed pct_typical values remain below a full 70-105% GC coverage target.