Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Clementine
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:12 PM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Close to two decades ago I fell in love with Clementine Essential Oil. As complex and multi-layered as a good Red Mandarine, but sweeter. The sweetness of Sweet Orange Rind or Tangerine, but more subtle. Almost a touch of floral to it. I love this deep reddish orange oil, but…the Spanish producer of that first, organic Clementine Oil stopped producing it. And I won’t use, or offer, non-organic cold-pressed citrus oils. So we have been without this delight for years. It is a species of mandarine, for those who have never experienced it, gentle and safe enough to use with toddlers. Relaxing, not energizing, it fills the room with calm, quiet, and peace. Finally a friend who has produced some rare Italian oils for us sent us his newest product sheet, and there it was! We are so glad to be able to enjoy it ourselves, and offer it to you. Safety: the issue with most citrus oils is photosensitization, so of course I reached for my copy of Essential Oil Safety to research it. “Clementine Oil has not been tested for phototoxicity. Limited availability” It is a relative of Mandarine, which is not a photosensitizer, but we do not know for certain. Shelf Life: 1 to 2 years after opening. Refrigerate to extend life. GC/MS Analysis: Batch No. IT-59262 (Current Batch) Citrus clementina, syn Citrus reticulata Blanco var clementina cold-pressed, organically produced Rind, Italy Gentle enough for toddlers Relaxing and Calming Phototoxicity is doubtful but uncertain
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 11002 | USD 12.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. IT-59262 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
1 report connected; 1 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
1 source document archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 90.86% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 2.68% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.87% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 0.81% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 0.70% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 0.67% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DecanalCAS 112-31-2 | 0.52% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octanal | 0.35% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-Farnesol | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DodecanalCAS 112-54-9 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CitronellalCAS 106-23-0 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neryl acetateCAS 141-12-8 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-4 | 0.09% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-CubebeneCAS 17699-14-8 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CubebeneCAS 13744-15-5 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Germacrene DCAS 23986-74-5 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-CadineneCAS 523-47-7 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-3-CareneCAS 13466-78-9 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-4 | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CitralCAS 5392-40-5 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Sibirene | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Carene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neral | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Perilla aldehydeCAS 2111-75-3 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-9 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 29.03 Farnesene<(E,E)-alpha-> 0.00 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Sinensal | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonanal | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Undecanol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Farnesene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Hexanone | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Sabinene hydrateCAS 7712-82-5 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Limonene oxide | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Octyl acetateCAS 112-14-1 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CarvoneCAS 99-49-0 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-GurjuneneCAS 22567-17-5 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tricosane Alkane | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Auraptene Coumarin | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Clementine
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Clementine
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.