Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Lime
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:06 AM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
Lime Oil has many of the same uses as Lemon Oil, but with a lighter, sweeter buoyant scent. The two, blended together, are delightful. This steam-distilled version avoids all risk of photosensitivity so is wonderful for skin care. Try it in an aftershave, or a lotion for oily skin. SAFETY: We offer only DISTILLED Lime Essential Oil because cold-pressed lime is one of the most powerful photosensitizers and should never be used topically. For your safety, we limit our offerings to the much safer distilled oil. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 1 to 2 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. ME-P140807 Batch No. ME-15926 Batch No. TH-58847 Batch No. ME-59108 Batch No. MX-59312 Batch No. MX-59439 (Current Batch) BLENDS WELL WITH: Neroli, Lavender and Lavendin, Rosemary, Clary Sage, and all other citrus oils. Citrus aurantifolia, grown chemical free and steam-distilled from the rind in Mexico, – not phototoxic (steam-distilled) – wonderful for skin care – lighter and sweeter than Lemon
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | fc1cebf02dc2ee68655f3e7bf1b84230 | USD 20.00 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- Batch No. ME-P140807Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ME-15926Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. TH-58847Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. ME-59108Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MX-59312Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
- Batch No. MX-59439 (Current Batch)Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
6 reports connected; 6 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
6 source documents archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, botanical name. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Source extraction has review notes
The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. A source date requires review against the original document. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 221.75%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| LimoneneCAS 138-86-3 | 44.34% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-TerpineneCAS 99-85-4 | 12.59% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinolene | 9.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineolCAS 98-55-5 | 8.42% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymene | 3.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-TerpineneCAS 99-86-5 | 2.63% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,4-CineoleCAS 470-67-7 | 2.62% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-PineneCAS 127-91-3 | 2.55% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcene | 1.31% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PineneCAS 80-56-8 | 1.20% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Terpineol | 1.18% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BisaboleneCAS 495-61-4 | 1.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Terpineol | 0.61% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E,E)-alpha-Farnesene | 0.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-1-ol | 0.58% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-4 | 0.58% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| CampheneCAS 79-92-5 | 0.51% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Fenchol | 0.48% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Ocimene | 0.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-PhellandreneCAS 99-83-2 | 0.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 0.44% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Caryophyllene | 0.37% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| BorneolCAS 507-70-0 | 0.30% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymenene | 0.25% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-beta-Terpineol | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-SelineneCAS 28624-23-9 | 0.17% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-beta-Ocimene | 0.16% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-FencheneCAS 471-84-1 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LinaloolCAS 78-70-6 | 0.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Zonarene | 0.14% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Cymen-8-ol | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranial | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-Bisabolene | 0.10% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Linalool oxide (5) (furanoid) | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| DecanalCAS 112-31-2 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 18252-46-5 | 0.08% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neral | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Elemene | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Humulene | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-SelineneCAS 515-17-3 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-MuuroleneCAS 30021-74-0 | 0.07% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-ElemeneCAS 20307-84-0 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Neryl acetateCAS 141-12-8 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Geranyl acetateCAS 105-87-3 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-CurcumeneCAS 28976-68-3 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-SelineneCAS 473-13-2 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Alloocimene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-beta-Farnesene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Selina-3,7(11)-diene | 0.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonanal | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1,3,8-para-Menthatriene | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Myrcenol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-ElemeneCAS 515-13-9 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-SantaleneCAS 511-59-1 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-BisaboleneCAS 25532-79-0 | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Caryophyllenyl alcohol | 0.04% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-ThujeneCAS 2867-05-2 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 2-Carene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Menthatriene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Ascaridol glycol | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-CadineneCAS 39029-41-9 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-EudesmolCAS 1209-71-8 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Nonane Alkane | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| TricycleneCAS 508-32-7 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-Dehydroxy linalool oxide | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Pseudolimonene | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Isoborneol | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| GeraniolCAS 106-24-1 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Terpinen-4-yl acetate | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| LongifoleneCAS 475-20-7 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| AromadendreneCAS 489-39-4 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| delta-CadineneCAS 483-76-1 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-BisabololCAS 515-69-5 | 0.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Bornylene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| SabineneCAS 3387-41-5 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Octanol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Perillene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| para-Methylacetophenone Simple Phenolic | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 1-Decanol | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Tridecane Alkane | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| UndecanalCAS 112-44-7 | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Muurolene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-gamma-Bisabolene | 0.01% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Lime
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Lime
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.